Notes:
Sermon 7: The Way to the Kingdom
217
An Introductory CommentThis sermon has a double text. The second one (Rom. 14:17) is invoked informally in I.1, and reminds us of Wesley’s first ‘tombstone sermon’ at Epworth, June 6, 1742, which was never published but probably has its residues here (cf. JWJ):
“After [the rector’s] sermon [against ‘enthusiasm’] John Taylor stood in the churchyard, and gave notice as the people were coming out, ‘Mr. Wesley, not being permitted to preach in the church, designs to preach here at six o’clock.’” “Accordingly at six I came, and found such a congregation as I believe Epworth never saw before. I stood near the east end of the church, upon my father’s tombstone, and cried, ‘The Kingdom of heaven is not meats and drinks, but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.’”Wesley records having preached from Rom. 14:17 seventeen times in the half-decade of 1739-43, and only twelve times thereafter (the last in 1791).
The formal text here is Mark 1:15, a favourite of Wesley’s in his oral preaching (he records having used it one hundred and ninety times in the forty-eight-year span, 1742-90). The result, however, is a single sermon with an integrated, cumulative argument that progresses from a negative comment on what true religion is not (viz., correct praxis and doctrine) to a positive definition of it (viz., love of God and neighbour, both as empowered by grace). These lead into an exhortation to repentance and belief which includes another summary statement about repentance as true self-knowledge and authentic contrition (as in No. 6, ‘The Righteousness of Faith’, II.6). Belief is never ‘bare assent’ but rather an assenting trust whose first-fruits are reconciliation and peace. All this points to the conclusion: a celebration of Christian joy ‘in the Holy Ghost’.
It is worth comparing this sermon with Wesley’s later published sermon on the same text (No. 14, The Repentance of Believers). The latter makes the rather different point that becomes important once the sola fide has been accepted (especially if also misconstrued), viz., that the Christian’s progress in sanctification does not preclude repentance. Indeed, since repentance means self-knowledge, the farther Christians are along their way to sanctification, the more sensitive they are to their shortfalls in faith, hope, and love.
218
The Way to the KingdomMark 1:15
The kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
These words naturally lead us to consider, first, the nature of true religion, here termed by our Lord ‘the kingdom of God’, which, saith he, ‘is at hand’; and secondly, the way thereto, which he points out in those words, ‘Repent ye, and believe the gospel.’
1I. 1. We are, first, to consider the nature of true religion, here termed
by our Lord ‘the kingdom of God’. The same expression the great Apostle uses in
his Epistle to the Romans, where he likewise explains his Lord’s words, saying,
‘The kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy
in the Holy Ghost.’
Rom. 14:17 [cf. 2 Tim. 2:22; Heb.
12:11].
22. ‘The kingdom of God’, or true religion, ‘is not meat and drink.’ It is
well known that not only the unconverted Jews, but great numbers of those who
had received the faith of Christ, were notwithstanding ‘zealous of the law’,
Acts
21:20.
Cf. Acts 15:19.
Acts 15:1, 24.
33. In opposition to these the Apostle declares, both here and in many other places, that true religion does not consist in meat and drink, or in any ritual observances; nor indeed in any outward thing whatever, in anything exterior to the heart; the whole 219substance thereof lying in ‘righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost’.
44. Not in any outward thing, such as forms or ceremonies, even of the most excellent kind. Supposing these to be ever so decent and significant, ever so expressive of inward things; supposing them ever so helpful, not only to the vulgar, whose thought reaches little farther than their sight, but even to men of understanding, men of strong capacities, as doubtless they may sometimes be; yea, supposing them, as in the case of the Jews, to be appointed by God himself; yet even during the period of time wherein that appointment remains in force, true religion does not principally consist therein—nay, strictly speaking, not at all. How much more must this hold concerning such rites and forms as are only of human appointment! The religion of Christ rises infinitely higher and lies immensely deeper than all these. These are good in their place; just so far as they are in fact subservient to true religion.
That Wesley himself did not dispense with symbols and ceremonials would appear from his insistence on wearing his gown and cassock both for his field preaching and in his meetings with the societies; see JWJ, Sept. 9, 1743. His exhortations to ‘use all the means of grace’ were turned into the third of his General Rules for all Methodists. This is a reflection of his firm distinction between vestments and ceremonies being used, and their being relied on; cf. George Whitefield, A Short Account of God’s Dealings with the Reverend Mr. Whitefield (London, Strahan, 1740), p. 44. It was also a sign of Wesley’s quiet negation of the famous Puritan rejection of vestments, prelacy, and the BCP as ‘popish remnants’. Thus, he could deny all intrinsic value to any external sign and still avoid any radical iconoclasm.
Deut. 7:25, etc.
55. The nature of religion is so far from consisting in these, in forms of worship, or rites and ceremonies, that it does not properly consist in any outward actions of what kind so ever.
A parallel rejection of moralism, on the one hand, and of antinomianism, on the other.
Cf. Jas. 4:17.
1 Pet. 3:4.
66. I say of the heart. For neither does religion consist in orthodoxy or right opinions;
Wesley’s attitudes toward ‘orthodoxy’ and ‘heresy’ were complex. Here, his thesis is that orthodoxy—like ceremonialism and moralism—is not of the essence of true religion, and he belabours the point that the devil is more orthodox than the soundest Christian theologian. This is a favourite point with him, as in Nos. 33, ‘Sermon on the Mount, XIII’, III.1; 62, ‘The End of Christ’s Coming’, III.5; 120, ‘The Unity of the Divine Being’, §15; 127, ‘On the Wedding Garment’, §15. Cf. also Wesley’s Plain Account of the People called Methodists, I.2; and his letters to James Clark, July 3 and Sept. 18, 1756; Bishop Warburton, Nov. 26, 1762; and John Erskine, Apr. 24, 1765. Cf. also Some Remarks on a Defence of…Aspasio Vindicated (Bibliog, No. 296, Vol. 13 of this edn.) See also Glanvill, Defence of Preaching, p. 83; and Norris, Miscellanies, pp. 173-202.
To these may be added his slogan for theological pluralism (‘to think and let think’): cf. Nos. 20, The Lord Our Righteousness, II.20; 37, ‘The Nature of Enthusiasm’, §36; 38, ‘A Caution against Bigotry’, II.3; 39, ‘Catholic Spirit’ (entire); 53, On the Death of George Whitefield, III.1; 55, On the Trinity, §2; 74, ‘Of the Church’, §19; 127, ‘On the Wedding Garment’, §14; 130, ‘On Living without God’, §15. See also JWJ, May 29, 1745; Dec. 3, 1776; Oct. 3, 1783; and Wesley’s letters to Miss March, Mar. 29, 1760; Dr. Warburton, Nov. 26, 1762; Henry Venn, June 22, 1763; John Newton, Apr. 9,1765; Philothea Briggs, June 20, 1772; Thomas Wride, Mar. 9, 1780; Joseph Benson, May 21, 1781; Mr. Howton, Oct. 3, 1783; Dr. Tomline, Mar. 1790. See also The Character of a Methodist, §1; and Some Observations on Liberty, §1 (Bibliog, No. 360, Vol. 15 of this edn.).
To conclude from all this, however, that Wesley was indifferent to the issues involved in sound doctrine is to misunderstand him. He had a clear view of heresy as deviation from the core of ‘standing revelation’; and had no hesitation in denouncing views that threatened this core. See his Doctrine of Original Sin, III.i, vii; IV. iv (‘First Essay’). If Methodism may rightly be charged with theological indifferentism, this has no valid grounds in Wesley himself.
Cf. No. 5, ‘Justification by Faith’, §2 and n.
I.e., the devil.
77. This alone is religion, truly so called: this alone is in the sight of God of great price. The Apostle sums it all up in three particulars—‘righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost’.
Cf. Rom. 14:17.
Cf. No. 29, ‘Sermon on the Mount, IX’, §20.
Matt. 22:40.
Mark 12:30 [actually Matt. 22:37-38].
Gen. 15:1.
Ps. 73:25.
Cf. Prov. 23:26.
Cf. Ps. 18:1 (BCP), where the text reads ‘stony rock’, and Ps. 31:3 (BCP), ‘And be thou my strong rock, and house of defence….’
88. And the second commandment is like unto this; the second great branch of Christian righteousness is closely and inseparably connected therewith, even ‘Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.’
Matt. 22:39, etc.
Note in this one paragraph the use of ‘preventing’ in the sense of hinder and of ‘prevent’ in its more literal sense of precede.
Wesley’s standard definition of neighbour, as appears from Nos. 2, The Almost Christian, II.2; 18, ‘The Marks of the New Birth’, III.3; 52, The Reformation of Manners, III.8; 65, ‘The Duty of Reproving our Neighbour’, II.2; 84, The Important Question, III.2; 100, ‘On Pleasing All Men’, §1; 107, ‘On God’s Vineyard’, I.9; 112, On Laying the Foundation of the New Chapel, II.1; 114, On the Death of John Fletcher, I.3.
No such definition appears in the OED. But Wesley could have found it in Thomas Sprat, Sermons Preached on Several Occasions (1722), p. 101; in Poole’s Annotations (on Ps. 15:3); in Law’s Serious Call (Works, IV.188, 216-25); and in Fleury, The Manners…of the Christians, p. 19.
Matt. 5:44.
Note here the ‘socialization’ of eudaemonism: the subjective ‘thirst for happiness’ is understood as interdependent with the Christian’s readiness to seek and serve his neighbour’s ‘happiness in every kind’ … ‘procuring for him every possible good’. Cf. No. 5, ‘Justification by Faith’, I.4 and n. This premise of Wesley’s social ethic was revolutionary in both its intention and partial effect; cf. Semmel, Methodist Revolution, chs. 1 and 3.
99. Now is not this love ‘the fulfilling of the law’?
Rom. 13:10.
Col. 3:12.
1 Cor. 13:4; note Wesley’s preference for ‘love’ instead of the AV’s ‘charity’; cf. No. 17, ‘The Circumcision of the Heart’, I.2 and n.
Col. 3:12.
1 Cor. 13:5, 7.
Rom. 13:10.
Titus 2:14.
Cf. Gal. 6:10.
Jas. 3:17.
10 2xx10. But true religion, or a heart right toward God and man, implies happiness as well as holiness.
‘Holiness’, here and everywhere in Wesley, denotes active love—to God (‘inward holiness’) and to neighbour (‘outward holiness’). Such love yields happiness less as an end product than as a by-product; see below, I.11-12. Cf. Nos. 6, ‘The Righteousness of Faith’, II.9 and n.; 18, ‘The Marks of the New Birth’, III.3; 24, ‘Sermon on the Mount, IV’, III.1; 45, ‘The New Birth’, III.1; 83, ‘On Patience’, §§9, 10; 84, The Important Question, III.2; 85, ‘On Working Out Our Own Salvation’, I.2; 107, ‘On God’s Vineyard’, I.9; and 112, On Laying the Foundation of the New Chapel, II.1.
Rom. 14:17.
Phil. 4:7.
Heb. 6:5.
Cf. 1 Cor. 2:14.
Cf. Rom. 8:16.
See 1 John 4:18.
Cf. Phil. 1:23.
1111. With this peace of God, wherever it is fixed in the soul, there is also ‘joy in the Holy Ghost’;
Rom. 14:17.
Rom. 5:11.
Cf. Ps. 32:1 (BCP). Wesley would appear to be quoting here from memory or else ‘back-translating’, since the Hebrew text omits היש (‘the one’), presumably as understood; cf. Rudolf Kittel, ed., Biblia Hebraica (New York, American Bible Society, 1937), and his apparatus technicus. In the pamphlet editions of this sermon, in Works, and in Benson, Jackson, and Sugden, the Hebrew phrase is omitted altogether. For further comments on Wesley’s use of Hebrew, cf. A Farther Appeal, Pt. I, I.6, III.5 (11:108, 125 of this edn.).
1 Pet. 1:8.
Rom. 5:2.
Cf. Rom. 8:18.
1 Pet. 1:4; 5:4.
1212. This holiness and happiness, joined in one, are sometimes styled in the inspired writings, ‘the kingdom of God’ (as by our Lord in the text), and sometimes, ‘the kingdom of heaven’. It is termed ‘the kingdom of God’ because it is the immediate fruit of God’s reigning in the soul. So soon as ever he takes unto himself his mighty power, and sets up his throne in our hearts, they are instantly filled with this ‘righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost’.
Rom. 14:17.
Cf. above, No. 4, Scriptural Christianity, III.5 and n.
Charles Wesley, ‘Hymn After the Sacrament,’ st. 6, ll. 3-4, in Hymns and Sacred Poems, 1739, p. 191 (Poet. Wks., I.170).
according to the constant tenor of Scripture, which everywhere bears record, ‘God
hath given unto us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. He that hath the
Son’ (reigning in his heart) ‘hath life,’ even life everlasting.
1 John
5:11-12. John
17:3.
See Dan. 3:8-30.
Mark Le Pla (1650-1715), vicar of Finchingfield (Essex), A Paraphrase on the Song of the Three Children (1724), concluding stanza. John Wesley included it in A Collection of Moral and Sacred Poems, II.101-34. This quotation appears in ‘O Ananias, Azarias, and Misael…’, st. xliv, ll. 14-19, p. 134.
22813. And this ‘kingdom of God’, or of heaven, ‘is at hand’. As these words were originally spoken they implied that ‘the time’ was then ‘fulfilled’,
Mark 1:15.
1 Tim. 3:16.
Matt. 28:20.
Luke 21:31.
1II. 1. This is the way: walk ye in it.
Isa. 30:21.
Wesley’s distinctive view of repentance as that self-knowledge which leads to contrition and to casting oneself on God’s pardoning mercy in Christ (‘trust’ rather than ‘assent’). Variations on this basic theme may be seen in Nos. 3, ‘Awake, Thou That Sleepest’, II.1; 6, ‘The Righteousness of Faith’, II.6; 14, The Repentance of Believers, III.2; 17, ‘The Circumcision of the Heart’, I.2; 21, ‘Sermon on the Mount, I’, I.4; 30, ‘Sermon on the Mount, X’, §7; 33, ‘Sermon on the Mount, XIII’, III.6; 78, ‘Spiritual Idolatry’, II.4; see also, below, II.6-7; and Wesley’s Notes on Matt. 5:3. In No. 79, ‘On Dissipation’, §19, Wesley comments on William Law’s inversion of faith and repentance in the ordo salutis in Law’s Spirit of Prayer (Works, VII.3-143). For Wesley’s denunciation of Bishop Bull’s doctrine of repentance, see Nos. 150 and 151, ‘Hypocrisy in Oxford’ (Eng. text, I.7; Lat. text, I.6).
Eph. 5:14.
Cf. Gal. 5:17.
Cf. Rom. 8:7.
See Eph. 1:18; 4:18.
Cf. Isa. 1:6.
22. Such is the inbred corruption of thy heart, of thy very inmost nature. And what manner of branches canst thou expect to grow from such an evil root? Hence springs unbelief, ever departing from the living God; saying, ‘Who is the Lord that I should serve him?’
Cf. Judg. 9:28, 38; Job 21:15.
Ps. 10:14 (BCP).
Rev. 3:17.
1 John 2:16. Wesley’s favourite blanket reference to what St. Augustine had already identified as the triplex concupiscentia which, as he and Wesley agreed, ‘includes all sin’ (cf. St. Augustine, Confessions, X. xxx. 41, et seq., and Expositions on the Psalms, VIII. 13; see also the letter, CCXX, to Boniface [427], §§5-9; and On Patience, 14-16, ‘the concupiscence of the bad’). Wesley repeats the text tirelessly, and its suggestion to him that sin is overreach of what in themselves are innocent appetites (as in the animals) reinforced his notion of our human responsibility in all sin. For this text related especially to the greed for money, cf. John Cardinal Bona, Precepts and Practical Rules for a Truly Christian Life, p. 38. See also Law, Serious Call, (Works, IV, 18, 178).
Cf. also Nos. 2, The Almost Christian, II. (i.) 1; 4, Scriptural Christianity, I.6; 9, ‘The Spirit of Bondage and of Adoption’, I.5, III.7; 14, The Repentance of Believers, I.5; 17, ‘The Circumcision of the Heart’, I.13, II.9; 28, ‘Sermon on the Mount, VIII’, §14; 41, Wandering Thoughts, III.4; 44, Original Sin, II.9, 10; 50, ‘The Use of Money’, II.1-2; 68, ‘The Wisdom of God’s Counsels’, §16; 78, ‘Spiritual Idolatry’, I.5-15; 80, ‘On Friendship with the World’, §16; 81, ‘In What Sense we are to Leave the World’, §11; 83, ‘On Patience’, §9; 84, The Important Question, I.3, III.10; 86, A Call to Backsliders, §4; 87, ‘The Danger of Riches’, I.12-16; 90, ‘An Israelite Indeed’, I.1; 95, ‘On the Education of Children’, §§8, 19; 107, ‘On God’s Vineyard’, V.3; 108, ‘On Riches’, II.2-3; 109, The Trouble and Rest of Good Men, I.3; 119, ‘Walking by Sight and Walking by Faith’, §17; 120, ‘The Unity of the Divine Being’, §12; 122, ‘Causes of the Inefficacy of Christianity’, §8; 125, ‘On a Single Eye’, II.1; 128, ‘The Deceitfulness of the Human Heart’, I.4; 131, ‘The Danger of Increasing Riches’, I.9, 10, 12, 15; 143, ‘Public Diversions Denounced’, III.2.
See also Wesley’s Notes on 1 John 2:16, and his letters to Mrs. Pendarves, Feb. 11, 1731; to Dr. Burton, Oct. 10, 1735; to his brother Samuel, Oct. 15, 1735; and to James Hutton, Apr. 30, 1739.
1 Tim. 6:4.
Cf. 1 Tim. 6:9, 10.
33. And what fruits can grow on such branches as these? Only such as are bitter and evil continually. Of pride cometh contention,
Prov. 13:10.
1 Cor. 6:19.
44. And knowest thou not that ‘the wages of sin is death’?
Rom. 6:23.
Ezek. 18:4, 20.
Isa. 1:20, etc.
See Rev. 2:11; 20:6, 14; 21:8.
2 Thess. 1:9.
See Matt 5:22; another quotation from memory since Wesley’s own Greek text (TR) read ἔνοχος ἔσται εἰς τὴν γέενναν τοῦ πυρός. It would seem that ἐστι for ἔσται and τῃ γεέννῃ for τὴν γέενναν are typographical errors left reverently uncorrected by subsequent printers and editors. But translating ἔνοχος as ‘under the sentence of hell-fire’—‘doomed already’—ignores the future tense of ἔσται. For Wesley’s more typical translation or exegeses of ἔνοχος (i.e., ‘obnoxious’ or ‘liable to’, ‘subject to’), see Nos. 9, ‘The Spirit of Bondage and of Adoption’, II.2; 22, ‘Sermon on the Mount, II’, I.7, 9, 10; 62, ‘The End of Christ’s Coming’, I.10; 92, ‘On Zeal’, III.1-4. The same usage may be found in Robert Gell’s Remaines: Or Several Select Scriptures of the New Testament Opened and Explained (1676), I.44; and Offspring Blackall, Works, I.221. See also St. Thomas, Summa Theologica, II. ii, Q. 158. A.5, obj. 3, ‘Of Anger’; and Macarius, Homily XXVIII, in Homilies (1721), p. 362. Cf. OED for the diversity of meanings for ‘obnoxious’.
See Num. 16:30.
Mark 9:43, 45.
55. And what wilt thou do to appease the wrath of God, to atone for all thy sins, and to escape the punishment thou hast so justly deserved? Alas, thou canst do nothing; nothing that will in any wise make amends to God for one evil work or word or thought. If thou couldst now do all things well, if from this very hour, till thy soul should return to God, thou couldst perform perfect, uninterrupted obedience, even this would not atone for what is past. The not increasing thy debt would not discharge it. It would still remain as great as ever. Yea, the present and future obedience of all the men upon earth, and all the angels in heaven, would never make satisfaction to the justice of God for one single sin. How vain then was the thought of atoning for thy own sins by anything thou couldst do! It costeth far more to redeem one soul than all mankind is able to pay. So that were there no other help for a guilty sinner, without doubt he must have perished everlastingly.
Echoes here from Anselm, Cur Deus Homo?, Bk. I, chs. xix-xxv; note there, and elsewhere in Anselm, a similar equation of holiness and happiness, as later in Wesley.
66. But suppose perfect obedience for the time to come could atone for the sins that are past, this would profit thee nothing; for thou art not able to perform it; no, not in any one point. Begin now. Make the trial. Shake off that outward sin that so easily besetteth thee.
See Heb. 12:1.
See Matt. 7:18; Luke 6:43.
See Eph. 2:1, 5.
2 Cor. 7:10. Cf. above, II.1 and n.
77. If to this lively conviction of thy inward and outward sins, of thy utter guiltiness and helplessness, there be added suitable affections—sorrow of heart for having despised thy own mercies; remorse and self-condemnation, having the mouth stopped, shame to lift up thine eyes to heaven;
See Luke 18:13.
See Isa. 1:16, 17.
Mark 12:34.
88. ‘The gospel’ (that is, good tidings, good news for guilty, helpless sinners) in the largest sense of the word means the whole revelation made to men by Jesus Christ; and sometimes the whole account of what our Lord did and suffered while he tabernacled among men.
A literal rendering of the ἐσκήνωσεν of John 1:14 (from σκῆνος, ‘tent’ or ‘tabernacle’).
Cf. 1 Tim. 1:15.
Cf. John 3:16.
Cf. Isa. 53:5.
9 2309. Believe this, and the kingdom of God is thine. By faith thou attainest the promise: ‘He pardoneth and absolveth all that truly repent and unfeignedly believe his holy gospel.’
BCP, Morning Prayer, Absolution (4).
Cf. Matt. 9:2.
Rom. 14:17.
1010. Only beware thou do not deceive thy own soul with regard to the nature of this faith. It is not (as some have fondly conceived) a bare assent to the truth of the Bible, of the articles of our creed, or of all that is contained in the Old and New Testament.
Cf. here the doctrines of John Glas (1695-1773) and Robert Sandeman (1718-71), Scottish independents who had rejected both the Calvinist doctrine of ‘final perseverance’ and the Methodist doctrine of ‘conversion’. Faith, they taught, was the clear-headed intellectual acceptance of ‘the Gospel history’ as recorded in the New Testament, and this in itself was saving. Wesley knew of them from Glas’s A Plea for Pure and Undefiled Religion (1741) and A Treatise on the Lord’s Supper (1743). Wesley’s diary of Mar. 8, 1741, records that he had ‘read Glas’. Later, Sandeman (under the pseudonym of ‘Palaemon’) would expound his soteriology in Letters on Theron and Aspasio. Addressed to the Author [James Hervey] (1757), which drew an extended reply from Wesley in a letter dated Nov. 1, 1757, in which the notion of faith as bare assent is sharply denounced as ‘stark, staring nonsense’ (see Bibliog, No. 221, Vol. 13 of this edn.).
See Jas. 2:19.
Cf. Homily, ‘Of Faith’, and I.6-7, above.
Cf. 2 Cor. 5:19.
See Gal. 2:20.
A conflation of Rom. 5:10 and Col. 1:20.
1111. Dost thou thus believe? Then the peace of God is in thy heart, and sorrow and sighing flee away.
Isa. 35:10.
Ps. 89:1 (BCP).
Cf. Luke 1:46-47.
Col. 1:14.
Cf. Rom. 8:15.
Wisd. 3:4.
Cf. Phil. 3:14.
1 Cor. 2:9.
1212. Dost thou now believe? Then ‘the love of God is’ now ‘shed abroad in thy heart.’
Cf. Rom. 5:5.
See 1 John 4:19.
See 1 John 4:21.
Gal. 5:22-23.
2 Cor. 3:18.
1313. This repentance, this faith, this peace, joy, love; this change from glory to glory, is what the wisdom of the world has voted to be madness, mere enthusiasm, utter distraction.
An echo of charges, chiefly against Whitefield, by various critics like The Weekly Advertiser (June 13, 1741), Joseph Trapp, The Nature, Folly, Sin, and Danger of Being Righteous Overmuch (1739), Richard Smalbroke (Bishop of Lichfield), and others. Cf. Green, Anti-Methodist Publications, for 1739-45. See also No. 10, ‘The Witness of the Spirit, I’, §1 and n.
See 2 Tim. 1:12.
Rev. 3:11.
Cf. Isa. 50:8.
Cf. Rom. 8:34.
Cf. 2 Pet. 1:11.
How to Cite This Entry
Bibliography:
, “.” In , edited by . , 2024. Entry published February 24, 2024. https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon007.About this Entry
Entry Title: Sermon 7: The Way to the Kingdom