Sermon
# found: 0
Toggle:
Show Page #s Themes (0) Notes (4)

Notes:

Sermon 7: The Way to the Kingdom

   https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon007

217

An Introductory Comment

This sermon has a double text. The second one (Rom. 14:17) is invoked informally in I.1, and reminds us of Wesley’s first ‘tombstone sermon’ at Epworth, June 6, 1742, which was never published but probably has its residues here (cf. JWJ):

“After [the rector’s] sermon [against ‘enthusiasm’] John Taylor stood in the churchyard, and gave notice as the people were coming out, ‘Mr. Wesley, not being permitted to preach in the church, designs to preach here at six o’clock.’” “Accordingly at six I came, and found such a congregation as I believe Epworth never saw before. I stood near the east end of the church, upon my father’s tombstone, and cried, ‘The Kingdom of heaven is not meats and drinks, but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.’”

Wesley records having preached from Rom. 14:17 seventeen times in the half-decade of 1739-43, and only twelve times thereafter (the last in 1791).

The formal text here is Mark 1:15, a favourite of Wesley’s in his oral preaching (he records having used it one hundred and ninety times in the forty-eight-year span, 1742-90). The result, however, is a single sermon with an integrated, cumulative argument that progresses from a negative comment on what true religion is not (viz., correct praxis and doctrine) to a positive definition of it (viz., love of God and neighbour, both as empowered by grace). These lead into an exhortation to repentance and belief which includes another summary statement about repentance as true self-knowledge and authentic contrition (as in No. 6, ‘The Righteousness of Faith’, II.6). Belief is never ‘bare assent’ but rather an assenting trust whose first-fruits are reconciliation and peace. All this points to the conclusion: a celebration of Christian joy ‘in the Holy Ghost’.

It is worth comparing this sermon with Wesley’s later published sermon on the same text (No. 14, The Repentance of Believers). The latter makes the rather different point that becomes important once the sola fide has been accepted (especially if also misconstrued), viz., that the Christian’s progress in sanctification does not preclude repentance. Indeed, since repentance means self-knowledge, the farther Christians are along their way to sanctification, the more sensitive they are to their shortfalls in faith, hope, and love.

218

The Way to the Kingdom

Mark 1:15

The kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.

These words naturally lead us to consider, first, the nature of true religion, here termed by our Lord ‘the kingdom of God’, which, saith he, ‘is at hand’; and secondly, the way thereto, which he points out in those words, ‘Repent ye, and believe the gospel.’

1I. 1. We are, first, to consider the nature of true religion, here termed by our Lord ‘the kingdom of God’. The same expression the great Apostle uses in his Epistle to the Romans, where he likewise explains his Lord’s words, saying, ‘The kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.’

Rom. 14:17 [cf. 2 Tim. 2:22; Heb. 12:11].

22. ‘The kingdom of God’, or true religion, ‘is not meat and drink.’ It is well known that not only the unconverted Jews, but great numbers of those who had received the faith of Christ, were notwithstanding ‘zealous of the law’,

Acts 21:20.

even the ceremonial law of Moses. Whatsoever therefore they found written therein, either concerning meat and drink offerings, or the distinction between clean and unclean meats, they not only observed themselves, but vehemently pressed the same even on those ‘among the Gentiles’ (or heathens) ‘who were turned to God’.
1

Cf. Acts 15:19.

Yea, to such a degree that some of them taught, wheresoever they came among them, ‘Except ye be circumcised, and keep the law’ (the whole ritual law), ‘ye cannot be saved.’

Acts 15:1, 24.

33. In opposition to these the Apostle declares, both here and in many other places, that true religion does not consist in meat and drink, or in any ritual observances; nor indeed in any outward thing whatever, in anything exterior to the heart; the whole 219substance thereof lying in ‘righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost’.

44. Not in any outward thing, such as forms or ceremonies, even of the most excellent kind. Supposing these to be ever so decent and significant, ever so expressive of inward things; supposing them ever so helpful, not only to the vulgar, whose thought reaches little farther than their sight, but even to men of understanding, men of strong capacities, as doubtless they may sometimes be; yea, supposing them, as in the case of the Jews, to be appointed by God himself; yet even during the period of time wherein that appointment remains in force, true religion does not principally consist therein—nay, strictly speaking, not at all. How much more must this hold concerning such rites and forms as are only of human appointment! The religion of Christ rises infinitely higher and lies immensely deeper than all these. These are good in their place; just so far as they are in fact subservient to true religion.

2

That Wesley himself did not dispense with symbols and ceremonials would appear from his insistence on wearing his gown and cassock both for his field preaching and in his meetings with the societies; see JWJ, Sept. 9, 1743. His exhortations to ‘use all the means of grace’ were turned into the third of his General Rules for all Methodists. This is a reflection of his firm distinction between vestments and ceremonies being used, and their being relied on; cf. George Whitefield, A Short Account of God’s Dealings with the Reverend Mr. Whitefield (London, Strahan, 1740), p. 44. It was also a sign of Wesley’s quiet negation of the famous Puritan rejection of vestments, prelacy, and the BCP as ‘popish remnants’. Thus, he could deny all intrinsic value to any external sign and still avoid any radical iconoclasm.

And it were superstition to object against them while they are applied only as occasional helps to human weakness. But let no man carry them farther. Let no man dream that they have any intrinsic worth; or that religion cannot subsist without them. This were to make them an abomination to the Lord.
3

Deut. 7:25, etc.

55. The nature of religion is so far from consisting in these, in forms of worship, or rites and ceremonies, that it does not properly consist in any outward actions of what kind so ever.

4

A parallel rejection of moralism, on the one hand, and of antinomianism, on the other.

It is true a man cannot have any religion who is guilty of vicious, immoral actions; or who does to others what he would not they should do to him if he were in the same circumstance. And it is also true that he can have no real religion who ‘knows to do good, and doth it not’.
5

Cf. Jas. 4:17.

Yet may a man both abstain from outward evil, and do good, and still have no religion. Yea, two persons may do 220the same outward work—suppose, feeding the hungry, or clothing the naked—and in the meantime one of these may be truly religious and the other have no religion at all; for the one may act from the love of God, and the other from the love of praise. So manifest it is that although true religion naturally leads to every good word and work, yet the real nature thereof lies deeper still, even in ‘the hidden man of the heart’.
6

1 Pet. 3:4.

66. I say of the heart. For neither does religion consist in orthodoxy or right opinions;

7

Wesley’s attitudes toward ‘orthodoxy’ and ‘heresy’ were complex. Here, his thesis is that orthodoxy—like ceremonialism and moralism—is not of the essence of true religion, and he belabours the point that the devil is more orthodox than the soundest Christian theologian. This is a favourite point with him, as in Nos. 33, ‘Sermon on the Mount, XIII’, III.1; 62, ‘The End of Christ’s Coming’, III.5; 120, ‘The Unity of the Divine Being’, §15; 127, ‘On the Wedding Garment’, §15. Cf. also Wesley’s Plain Account of the People called Methodists, I.2; and his letters to James Clark, July 3 and Sept. 18, 1756; Bishop Warburton, Nov. 26, 1762; and John Erskine, Apr. 24, 1765. Cf. also Some Remarks on a Defence of…Aspasio Vindicated (Bibliog, No. 296, Vol. 13 of this edn.) See also Glanvill, Defence of Preaching, p. 83; and Norris, Miscellanies, pp. 173-202.

To these may be added his slogan for theological pluralism (‘to think and let think’): cf. Nos. 20, The Lord Our Righteousness, II.20; 37, ‘The Nature of Enthusiasm’, §36; 38, ‘A Caution against Bigotry’, II.3; 39, ‘Catholic Spirit’ (entire); 53, On the Death of George Whitefield, III.1; 55, On the Trinity, §2; 74, ‘Of the Church’, §19; 127, ‘On the Wedding Garment’, §14; 130, ‘On Living without God’, §15. See also JWJ, May 29, 1745; Dec. 3, 1776; Oct. 3, 1783; and Wesley’s letters to Miss March, Mar. 29, 1760; Dr. Warburton, Nov. 26, 1762; Henry Venn, June 22, 1763; John Newton, Apr. 9,1765; Philothea Briggs, June 20, 1772; Thomas Wride, Mar. 9, 1780; Joseph Benson, May 21, 1781; Mr. Howton, Oct. 3, 1783; Dr. Tomline, Mar. 1790. See also The Character of a Methodist, §1; and Some Observations on Liberty, §1 (Bibliog, No. 360, Vol. 15 of this edn.).

To conclude from all this, however, that Wesley was indifferent to the issues involved in sound doctrine is to misunderstand him. He had a clear view of heresy as deviation from the core of ‘standing revelation’; and had no hesitation in denouncing views that threatened this core. See his Doctrine of Original Sin, III.i, vii; IV. iv (‘First Essay’). If Methodism may rightly be charged with theological indifferentism, this has no valid grounds in Wesley himself.

which, although they are not properly outward things, are not in the heart, but the understanding. A man may be orthodox in every point; he may not only espouse right opinions, but zealously defend them against all opposers; he may think justly concerning the incarnation of our Lord, concerning the ever blessed Trinity, and every other doctrine contained in the oracles of God.
8

Cf. No. 5, ‘Justification by Faith’, §2 and n.

He may assent to all the three creeds—that called the Apostles’, the Nicene, and the Athanasian—and yet ’tis possible he may have no religion at all, no more than a Jew, Turk, or pagan. He may be almost as orthodox as the devil (though indeed not altogether; for every man errs in 221something, whereas we can’t well conceive him
9

I.e., the devil.

to hold any erroneous opinion) and may all the while be as great a stranger as he to the religion of the heart.

77. This alone is religion, truly so called: this alone is in the sight of God of great price. The Apostle sums it all up in three particulars—‘righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost’.

10

Cf. Rom. 14:17.

And first, righteousness.
11

Cf. No. 29, ‘Sermon on the Mount, IX’, §20.

We cannot be at a loss concerning this if we remember the words of our Lord describing the two grand branches thereof, on which ‘hang all the law and the prophets’:
12

Matt. 22:40.

‘Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy mind, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength. This is the first and great commandment,’

Mark 12:30 [actually Matt. 22:37-38].

the first and great branch of Christian righteousness. Thou shalt delight thyself in the Lord thy God; thou shalt seek and find all happiness in him. He shall be ‘thy shield, and thy exceeding great reward’,
13

Gen. 15:1.

in time and in eternity. All thy bones shall say, ‘Whom have I in heaven but thee? And there is none upon earth that I desire beside thee!’
14

Ps. 73:25.

Thou shalt hear and fulfil his word who saith, ‘My son, give me thy heart.’
15

Cf. Prov. 23:26.

And having given him thy heart, thy inmost soul, to reign there without a rival, thou mayest well cry out in the fullness of thy heart, ‘I will love thee, O Lord, my strength. The Lord is my strong rock and my defence: my Saviour, my God, and my might, in whom I will trust; my buckler, the horn also of my salvation, and my refuge.’
16

Cf. Ps. 18:1 (BCP), where the text reads ‘stony rock’, and Ps. 31:3 (BCP), ‘And be thou my strong rock, and house of defence….’

88. And the second commandment is like unto this; the second great branch of Christian righteousness is closely and inseparably connected therewith, even ‘Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.’

17

Matt. 22:39, etc.

‘Thou shalt love’—thou shalt embrace with the most tender goodwill, the most earnest and cordial affection, the most inflamed desires of preventing or removing all evil and procuring for him every possible good—‘thy neighbour’; that is, not only thy friend, thy kinsman, or thy acquaintance; not only the 222virtuous, the friendly, him that loves thee, that prevents
18

Note in this one paragraph the use of ‘preventing’ in the sense of hinder and of ‘prevent’ in its more literal sense of precede.

or returns thy kindness; but every child of man, every human creature,
19

Wesley’s standard definition of neighbour, as appears from Nos. 2, The Almost Christian, II.2; 18, ‘The Marks of the New Birth’, III.3; 52, The Reformation of Manners, III.8; 65, ‘The Duty of Reproving our Neighbour’, II.2; 84, The Important Question, III.2; 100, ‘On Pleasing All Men’, §1; 107, ‘On God’s Vineyard’, I.9; 112, On Laying the Foundation of the New Chapel, II.1; 114, On the Death of John Fletcher, I.3.

No such definition appears in the OED. But Wesley could have found it in Thomas Sprat, Sermons Preached on Several Occasions (1722), p. 101; in Poole’s Annotations (on Ps. 15:3); in Law’s Serious Call (Works, IV.188, 216-25); and in Fleury, The Manners…of the Christians, p. 19.

every soul which God hath made: not excepting him whom thou never hast seen in the flesh, whom thou knowest not either by face or name; not excepting him whom thou knowest to be evil and unthankful, him that still despitefully uses and persecutes thee.
20

Matt. 5:44.

Him thou shalt ‘love as thyself’; with the same invariable thirst after his happiness in every kind,
21

Note here the ‘socialization’ of eudaemonism: the subjective ‘thirst for happiness’ is understood as interdependent with the Christian’s readiness to seek and serve his neighbour’s ‘happiness in every kind’ … ‘procuring for him every possible good’. Cf. No. 5, ‘Justification by Faith’, I.4 and n. This premise of Wesley’s social ethic was revolutionary in both its intention and partial effect; cf. Semmel, Methodist Revolution, chs. 1 and 3.

the same unwearied care to screen him from whatever might grieve or hurt either his soul or body.

99. Now is not this love ‘the fulfilling of the law’?

22

Rom. 13:10.

The sum of all Christian righteousness? Of all inward righteousness; for it necessarily implies ‘bowels of mercies, humbleness of mind’
23

Col. 3:12.

(seeing ‘love is not puffed up’),
24

1 Cor. 13:4; note Wesley’s preference for ‘love’ instead of the AV’s ‘charity’; cf. No. 17, ‘The Circumcision of the Heart’, I.2 and n.

‘gentleness, meekness, long-suffering’
25

Col. 3:12.

(for love ‘is not provoked’, but ‘believeth, hopeth, endureth all things’):
26

1 Cor. 13:5, 7.

and of all outward righteousness, for ‘love worketh no evil to his neighbour’,
27

Rom. 13:10.

either by word or deed. It cannot willingly either hurt or grieve anyone. And it is zealous of good works.
28

Titus 2:14.

Every lover of mankind, as he hath opportunity, ‘doth good unto all men’,
29

Cf. Gal. 6:10.

being (‘without partiality and without hypocrisy’) ‘full of mercy and good fruits’.
30

Jas. 3:17.

10 2xx10. But true religion, or a heart right toward God and man, implies happiness as well as holiness.

31

‘Holiness’, here and everywhere in Wesley, denotes active love—to God (‘inward holiness’) and to neighbour (‘outward holiness’). Such love yields happiness less as an end product than as a by-product; see below, I.11-12. Cf. Nos. 6, ‘The Righteousness of Faith’, II.9 and n.; 18, ‘The Marks of the New Birth’, III.3; 24, ‘Sermon on the Mount, IV’, III.1; 45, ‘The New Birth’, III.1; 83, ‘On Patience’, §§9, 10; 84, The Important Question, III.2; 85, ‘On Working Out Our Own Salvation’, I.2; 107, ‘On God’s Vineyard’, I.9; and 112, On Laying the Foundation of the New Chapel, II.1.

For it is not only righteousness, but also ‘peace and joy in the Holy Ghost’.
32

Rom. 14:17.

What peace? ‘The peace of God’, which God only can give, and the world cannot take away; the peace ‘which passeth all understanding’,
33

Phil. 4:7.

all (barely) rational conception; being a supernatural sensation, a divine taste of ‘the powers of the world to come’;
34

Heb. 6:5.

such as the natural man knoweth not, how wise soever in the things of this world; nor, indeed, can he know it in his present state, ‘because it is spiritually discerned’.
35

Cf. 1 Cor. 2:14.

It is a peace that banishes all doubt, all painful uncertainty, the Spirit of God ‘bearing witness with the spirit’ of a Christian that he is ‘a child of God’.
36

Cf. Rom. 8:16.

And it banishes fear, all such fear as hath torment;
37

See 1 John 4:18.

the fear of the wrath of God, the fear of hell, the fear of the devil, and, in particular, the fear of death: he that hath the peace of God ‘desiring’ (if it were the will of God) ‘to depart and to be with Christ’.
38

Cf. Phil. 1:23.

1111. With this peace of God, wherever it is fixed in the soul, there is also ‘joy in the Holy Ghost’;

39

Rom. 14:17.

joy wrought in the heart by the Holy Ghost, by the ever-blessed Spirit of God. He it is that worketh in us that calm, humble rejoicing in God, through Christ Jesus, ‘by whom we have now received the atonement’,
40

Rom. 5:11.

καταλλαγήν, the reconciliation with God; and that enables us boldly to confirm the truth of the royal Psalmist’s declaration, ‘Blessed is the man’ (or rather, happy, אשדי היש) ‘whose unrighteousness is forgiven, and whose sin is covered.’
41

Cf. Ps. 32:1 (BCP). Wesley would appear to be quoting here from memory or else ‘back-translating’, since the Hebrew text omits היש (‘the one’), presumably as understood; cf. Rudolf Kittel, ed., Biblia Hebraica (New York, American Bible Society, 1937), and his apparatus technicus. In the pamphlet editions of this sermon, in Works, and in Benson, Jackson, and Sugden, the Hebrew phrase is omitted altogether. For further comments on Wesley’s use of Hebrew, cf. A Farther Appeal, Pt. I, I.6, III.5 (11:108, 125 of this edn.).

He it is 224that inspires the Christian soul with that even, solid joy which arises from the testimony of the Spirit that he is a child of God; and that gives him to ‘rejoice with joy unspeakable’,
42

1 Pet. 1:8.

‘in hope of the glory of God’
43

Rom. 5:2.

—hope both of the glorious image of God, which is in part and shall be fully ‘revealed in him’,
44

Cf. Rom. 8:18.

and of that crown of glory which fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for him.
45

1 Pet. 1:4; 5:4.

1212. This holiness and happiness, joined in one, are sometimes styled in the inspired writings, ‘the kingdom of God’ (as by our Lord in the text), and sometimes, ‘the kingdom of heaven’. It is termed ‘the kingdom of God’ because it is the immediate fruit of God’s reigning in the soul. So soon as ever he takes unto himself his mighty power, and sets up his throne in our hearts, they are instantly filled with this ‘righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost’.

46

Rom. 14:17.

It is called ‘the kingdom of heaven’ because it is (in a degree) heaven opened in the soul.
47

Cf. above, No. 4, Scriptural Christianity, III.5 and n.

For whosoever they are that experience this, they can aver before angels and men,

Everlasting life is won:
Glory is on earth begun
;
48

Charles Wesley, ‘Hymn After the Sacrament,’ st. 6, ll. 3-4, in Hymns and Sacred Poems, 1739, p. 191 (Poet. Wks., I.170).

according to the constant tenor of Scripture, which everywhere bears record, ‘God hath given unto us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. He that hath the Son’ (reigning in his heart) ‘hath life,’ even life everlasting.

1 John 5:11-12.

For ‘this is life eternal, to know thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent….’

John 17:3.

And they to whom this is given may confidently address God, though they were in the midst of a fiery furnace,
49

See Dan. 3:8-30.

Thee…, Lord, safe-shielded by thy power,
Thee, Son of God, Jehovah, we adore,
In form of man descending to appear:
To thee be ceaseless hallelujahs given.
Praise, as in heaven thy throne, we offer here;
For where thy presence is displayed, is heaven.
50

Mark Le Pla (1650-1715), vicar of Finchingfield (Essex), A Paraphrase on the Song of the Three Children (1724), concluding stanza. John Wesley included it in A Collection of Moral and Sacred Poems, II.101-34. This quotation appears in ‘O Ananias, Azarias, and Misael…’, st. xliv, ll. 14-19, p. 134.

22813. And this ‘kingdom of God’, or of heaven, ‘is at hand’. As these words were originally spoken they implied that ‘the time’ was then ‘fulfilled’,

51

Mark 1:15.

God being made ‘manifest in the flesh’,
52

1 Tim. 3:16.

when he would set up his kingdom among men, and reign in the hearts of his people. And is not the time now fulfilled? For ‘Lo (saith he), I am with you always’, you who preach remission of sins in my name, ‘even unto the end of the world.’

Matt. 28:20.

Wheresoever therefore the gospel of Christ is preached, this his ‘kingdom is nigh at hand’.
53

Luke 21:31.

It is not far from every one of you. Ye may this hour enter thereinto, if so be ye hearken to his voice, ‘Repent ye, and believe the gospel.’

2

1II. 1. This is the way: walk ye in it.

54

Isa. 30:21.

And first, repent, that is, know yourselves.
55

Wesley’s distinctive view of repentance as that self-knowledge which leads to contrition and to casting oneself on God’s pardoning mercy in Christ (‘trust’ rather than ‘assent’). Variations on this basic theme may be seen in Nos. 3, ‘Awake, Thou That Sleepest’, II.1; 6, ‘The Righteousness of Faith’, II.6; 14, The Repentance of Believers, III.2; 17, ‘The Circumcision of the Heart’, I.2; 21, ‘Sermon on the Mount, I’, I.4; 30, ‘Sermon on the Mount, X’, §7; 33, ‘Sermon on the Mount, XIII’, III.6; 78, ‘Spiritual Idolatry’, II.4; see also, below, II.6-7; and Wesley’s Notes on Matt. 5:3. In No. 79, ‘On Dissipation’, §19, Wesley comments on William Law’s inversion of faith and repentance in the ordo salutis in Law’s Spirit of Prayer (Works, VII.3-143). For Wesley’s denunciation of Bishop Bull’s doctrine of repentance, see Nos. 150 and 151, ‘Hypocrisy in Oxford’ (Eng. text, I.7; Lat. text, I.6).

This is the first repentance, previous to faith, even conviction, or self-knowledge. Awake, then, thou that sleepest.
56

Eph. 5:14.

Know thyself to be a sinner, and what manner of sinner thou art. Know that corruption of thy inmost nature, whereby thou art very far gone from original righteousness, whereby ‘the flesh lusteth’ always ‘contrary to the Spirit’,
57

Cf. Gal. 5:17.

through that ‘carnal mind which is enmity against God’, which ‘is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be’.
58

Cf. Rom. 8:7.

Know that thou art corrupted in every power, in every faculty of thy soul, that thou art totally corrupted in every one of these, all the foundations being out of course. The eyes of thine understanding are darkened, so that they cannot discern God or the things of God.
59

See Eph. 1:18; 4:18.

The clouds 226of ignorance and error rest upon thee, and cover thee with the shadow of death. Thou knowest nothing yet as thou oughtest to know, neither God, nor the world, nor thyself. Thy will is no longer the will of God, but is utterly perverse and distorted, averse from all good, from all which God loves, and prone to all evil, to every abomination which God hateth. Thy affections are alienated from God, and scattered abroad over all the earth. All thy passions, both thy desires and aversions, thy joys and sorrows, thy hopes and fears, are out of frame, are either undue in their degree, or placed on undue objects. So that there is no soundness in thy soul, but ‘from the crown of the head to the sole of the foot’ (to use the strong expression of the prophet) there are only ‘wounds, and bruises, and putrefying sores’.
60

Cf. Isa. 1:6.

22. Such is the inbred corruption of thy heart, of thy very inmost nature. And what manner of branches canst thou expect to grow from such an evil root? Hence springs unbelief, ever departing from the living God; saying, ‘Who is the Lord that I should serve him?’

61

Cf. Judg. 9:28, 38; Job 21:15.

‘Tush! Thou, God, carest not for it.’
62

Ps. 10:14 (BCP).

Hence independence, affecting to be like the Most High; hence pride, in all its forms, teaching thee to say, ‘I am rich, and increased in goods, and have need of nothing.’
63

Rev. 3:17.

From this evil fountain flow forth the bitter streams of vanity, thirst of praise, ambition, covetousness, the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eye, and the pride of life.
64

1 John 2:16. Wesley’s favourite blanket reference to what St. Augustine had already identified as the triplex concupiscentia which, as he and Wesley agreed, ‘includes all sin’ (cf. St. Augustine, Confessions, X. xxx. 41, et seq., and Expositions on the Psalms, VIII. 13; see also the letter, CCXX, to Boniface [427], §§5-9; and On Patience, 14-16, ‘the concupiscence of the bad’). Wesley repeats the text tirelessly, and its suggestion to him that sin is overreach of what in themselves are innocent appetites (as in the animals) reinforced his notion of our human responsibility in all sin. For this text related especially to the greed for money, cf. John Cardinal Bona, Precepts and Practical Rules for a Truly Christian Life, p. 38. See also Law, Serious Call, (Works, IV, 18, 178).

Cf. also Nos. 2, The Almost Christian, II. (i.) 1; 4, Scriptural Christianity, I.6; 9, ‘The Spirit of Bondage and of Adoption’, I.5, III.7; 14, The Repentance of Believers, I.5; 17, ‘The Circumcision of the Heart’, I.13, II.9; 28, ‘Sermon on the Mount, VIII’, §14; 41, Wandering Thoughts, III.4; 44, Original Sin, II.9, 10; 50, ‘The Use of Money’, II.1-2; 68, ‘The Wisdom of God’s Counsels’, §16; 78, ‘Spiritual Idolatry’, I.5-15; 80, ‘On Friendship with the World’, §16; 81, ‘In What Sense we are to Leave the World’, §11; 83, ‘On Patience’, §9; 84, The Important Question, I.3, III.10; 86, A Call to Backsliders, §4; 87, ‘The Danger of Riches’, I.12-16; 90, ‘An Israelite Indeed’, I.1; 95, ‘On the Education of Children’, §§8, 19; 107, ‘On God’s Vineyard’, V.3; 108, ‘On Riches’, II.2-3; 109, The Trouble and Rest of Good Men, I.3; 119, ‘Walking by Sight and Walking by Faith’, §17; 120, ‘The Unity of the Divine Being’, §12; 122, ‘Causes of the Inefficacy of Christianity’, §8; 125, ‘On a Single Eye’, II.1; 128, ‘The Deceitfulness of the Human Heart’, I.4; 131, ‘The Danger of Increasing Riches’, I.9, 10, 12, 15; 143, ‘Public Diversions Denounced’, III.2.

See also Wesley’s Notes on 1 John 2:16, and his letters to Mrs. Pendarves, Feb. 11, 1731; to Dr. Burton, Oct. 10, 1735; to his brother Samuel, Oct. 15, 1735; and to James Hutton, Apr. 30, 1739.

227From this arise anger, hatred, malice, revenge, envy, jealousy, evil surmisings;
65

1 Tim. 6:4.

from this, all the foolish and hurtful lusts that now ‘pierce thee through with many sorrows’, and if not timely prevented will at length ‘drown thy soul in everlasting perdition’.
66

Cf. 1 Tim. 6:9, 10.

33. And what fruits can grow on such branches as these? Only such as are bitter and evil continually. Of pride cometh contention,

67

Prov. 13:10.

vain boasting, seeking and receiving praise of men, and so robbing God of that glory which he cannot give unto another. Of the lust of the flesh come gluttony or drunkenness, luxury or sensuality, fornication, uncleanness, variously defiling that body which was designed for a temple of the Holy Ghost:
68

1 Cor. 6:19.

of unbelief, every evil word and work. But the time would fail, shouldst thou reckon up all; all the idle words thou hast spoken, provoking the Most High, grieving the Holy One of Israel; all the evil works thou hast done, either wholly evil in themselves, or at least not done to the glory of God. For thy actual sins are more than thou art able to express, more than the hairs of thy head. Who can number the sands of the sea, or the drops of rain, or thy iniquities?

44. And knowest thou not that ‘the wages of sin is death’?

69

Rom. 6:23.

—death not only temporal, but eternal. ‘The soul that sinneth, it shall die;’
70

Ezek. 18:4, 20.

for the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it.
71

Isa. 1:20, etc.

It shall die the second death.
72

See Rev. 2:11; 20:6, 14; 21:8.

This is the sentence, to ‘be punished’ with never-ending death, ‘with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power’.
73

2 Thess. 1:9.

Knowest thou not that every sinner ἔνοχος ἔστι τῃ γέεννῃν τοῦ πυρός, not properly is ‘in danger of hell-fire’
74

See Matt 5:22; another quotation from memory since Wesley’s own Greek text (TR) read ἔνοχος ἔσται εἰς τὴν γέενναν τοῦ πυρός. It would seem that ἐστι for ἔσται and τῃ γεέννῃ for τὴν γέενναν are typographical errors left reverently uncorrected by subsequent printers and editors. But translating ἔνοχος as ‘under the sentence of hell-fire’—‘doomed already’—ignores the future tense of ἔσται. For Wesley’s more typical translation or exegeses of ἔνοχος (i.e., ‘obnoxious’ or ‘liable to’, ‘subject to’), see Nos. 9, ‘The Spirit of Bondage and of Adoption’, II.2; 22, ‘Sermon on the Mount, II’, I.7, 9, 10; 62, ‘The End of Christ’s Coming’, I.10; 92, ‘On Zeal’, III.1-4. The same usage may be found in Robert Gell’s Remaines: Or Several Select Scriptures of the New Testament Opened and Explained (1676), I.44; and Offspring Blackall, Works, I.221. See also St. Thomas, Summa Theologica, II. ii, Q. 158. A.5, obj. 3, ‘Of Anger’; and Macarius, Homily XXVIII, in Homilies (1721), p. 362. Cf. OED for the diversity of meanings for ‘obnoxious’.

—that expression 228is far too weak—but rather, ‘is under the sentence of hell-fire’; doomed already, just dragging to execution? Thou art guilty of everlasting death. It is the just reward of thy inward and outward wickedness. It is just that the sentence should now take place. Dost thou see, dost thou feel this? Art thou throughly convinced that thou deservest God’s wrath and everlasting damnation? Would God do thee any wrong if he now commanded the earth to open and swallow thee up? If thou wert now to go down quick into the pit,
75

See Num. 16:30.

into the fire that never shall be quenched?
76

Mark 9:43, 45.

If God hath given thee truly to repent, thou hast a deep sense that these things are so; and that it is of his mere mercy thou art not consumed, swept away from the face of the earth.

55. And what wilt thou do to appease the wrath of God, to atone for all thy sins, and to escape the punishment thou hast so justly deserved? Alas, thou canst do nothing; nothing that will in any wise make amends to God for one evil work or word or thought. If thou couldst now do all things well, if from this very hour, till thy soul should return to God, thou couldst perform perfect, uninterrupted obedience, even this would not atone for what is past. The not increasing thy debt would not discharge it. It would still remain as great as ever. Yea, the present and future obedience of all the men upon earth, and all the angels in heaven, would never make satisfaction to the justice of God for one single sin. How vain then was the thought of atoning for thy own sins by anything thou couldst do! It costeth far more to redeem one soul than all mankind is able to pay. So that were there no other help for a guilty sinner, without doubt he must have perished everlastingly.

77

Echoes here from Anselm, Cur Deus Homo?, Bk. I, chs. xix-xxv; note there, and elsewhere in Anselm, a similar equation of holiness and happiness, as later in Wesley.

66. But suppose perfect obedience for the time to come could atone for the sins that are past, this would profit thee nothing; for thou art not able to perform it; no, not in any one point. Begin now. Make the trial. Shake off that outward sin that so easily besetteth thee.

78

See Heb. 12:1.

Thou canst not. How then wilt thou change thy life from all evil to all good? Indeed, it is impossible to be done, 229unless first thy heart be changed. For so long as the tree remains evil, it cannot bring forth good fruit.
79

See Matt. 7:18; Luke 6:43.

But art thou able to change thy own heart from all sin to all holiness? To quicken a soul that is dead in sin?
80

See Eph. 2:1, 5.

Dead to God and alive only to the world? No more than thou art able to quicken a dead body, to raise to life him that lieth in the grave. Yea, thou art not able to quicken thy soul in any degree, no more than to give any degree of life to the dead body. Thou canst do nothing, more or less, in this matter; thou art utterly without strength. To be deeply sensible of this, how helpless thou art, as well as how guilty and how sinful, this is that ‘repentance not to be repented of’
81

2 Cor. 7:10. Cf. above, II.1 and n.

which is the forerunner of the kingdom of God.

77. If to this lively conviction of thy inward and outward sins, of thy utter guiltiness and helplessness, there be added suitable affections—sorrow of heart for having despised thy own mercies; remorse and self-condemnation, having the mouth stopped, shame to lift up thine eyes to heaven;

82

See Luke 18:13.

fear of the wrath of God abiding on thee, of his curse hanging over thy head, and of the fiery indignation ready to devour those who forget God and obey not our Lord Jesus Christ; earnest desire to escape from that indignation, to cease from evil and learn to do well
83

See Isa. 1:16, 17.

—then I say unto thee, in the name of the Lord, ‘Thou art not far from the kingdom of God.’
84

Mark 12:34.

One step more and thou shalt enter in. Thou dost ‘repent’. Now, ‘believe the gospel’.

88. ‘The gospel’ (that is, good tidings, good news for guilty, helpless sinners) in the largest sense of the word means the whole revelation made to men by Jesus Christ; and sometimes the whole account of what our Lord did and suffered while he tabernacled among men.

85

A literal rendering of the ἐσκήνωσεν of John 1:14 (from σκῆνος, ‘tent’ or ‘tabernacle’).

The substance of all is, ‘Jesus Christ came into the world to save sinners;’
86

Cf. 1 Tim. 1:15.

or, ‘God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, to the end we might not perish, but have everlasting life;’
87

Cf. John 3:16.

or, ‘He was bruised for our transgressions, he was wounded for our iniquities; the chastisement of our peace was upon him, and with his stripes we are healed.’
88

Cf. Isa. 53:5.

9 2309. Believe this, and the kingdom of God is thine. By faith thou attainest the promise: ‘He pardoneth and absolveth all that truly repent and unfeignedly believe his holy gospel.’

89

BCP, Morning Prayer, Absolution (4).

As soon as ever God hath spoken to thy heart, ‘Be of good cheer, thy sins are forgiven thee,’
90

Cf. Matt. 9:2.

his kingdom comes; thou hast righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.
91

Rom. 14:17.

1010. Only beware thou do not deceive thy own soul with regard to the nature of this faith. It is not (as some have fondly conceived) a bare assent to the truth of the Bible, of the articles of our creed, or of all that is contained in the Old and New Testament.

92

Cf. here the doctrines of John Glas (1695-1773) and Robert Sandeman (1718-71), Scottish independents who had rejected both the Calvinist doctrine of ‘final perseverance’ and the Methodist doctrine of ‘conversion’. Faith, they taught, was the clear-headed intellectual acceptance of ‘the Gospel history’ as recorded in the New Testament, and this in itself was saving. Wesley knew of them from Glas’s A Plea for Pure and Undefiled Religion (1741) and A Treatise on the Lord’s Supper (1743). Wesley’s diary of Mar. 8, 1741, records that he had ‘read Glas’. Later, Sandeman (under the pseudonym of ‘Palaemon’) would expound his soteriology in Letters on Theron and Aspasio. Addressed to the Author [James Hervey] (1757), which drew an extended reply from Wesley in a letter dated Nov. 1, 1757, in which the notion of faith as bare assent is sharply denounced as ‘stark, staring nonsense’ (see Bibliog, No. 221, Vol. 13 of this edn.).

The devils believe
93

See Jas. 2:19.

this, as well as I or thou; and yet they are devils still. But it is, over and above this, a sure trust in the mercy of God through Christ Jesus.
94

Cf. Homily, ‘Of Faith’, and I.6-7, above.

It is a confidence in a pardoning God. It is a divine evidence or conviction that ‘God was in Christ, reconciling the world to himself, not imputing to them their former trespasses;’
95

Cf. 2 Cor. 5:19.

and in particular that the Son of God hath loved me and given himself for me;
96

See Gal. 2:20.

and that I, even I, am now reconciled to God by the blood of the cross.
97

A conflation of Rom. 5:10 and Col. 1:20.

1111. Dost thou thus believe? Then the peace of God is in thy heart, and sorrow and sighing flee away.

98

Isa. 35:10.

Thou art no longer in doubt of the love of God; it is clear as the noonday sun. Thou criest out, ‘My song shall be always of the loving-kindness of the Lord: with my mouth will I ever be telling of thy truth, from one generation to another.’
99

Ps. 89:1 (BCP).

Thou art no longer afraid of hell, or death, or him that had once the power of death, the devil: no, nor painfully afraid of God himself; only thou hast a tender, filial fear of offending him. Dost thou believe? Then thy ‘soul doth magnify 231the Lord, and thy spirit rejoiceth in God thy Saviour’.
100

Cf. Luke 1:46-47.

Thou rejoicest in that thou hast ‘redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins’.
101

Col. 1:14.

Thou rejoicest in that ‘Spirit of adoption which crieth in thy heart, Abba, Father!’
102

Cf. Rom. 8:15.

Thou rejoicest in a ‘hope full of immortality’;
103

Wisd. 3:4.

in reaching forth unto the ‘mark of the prize of thy high calling’;
104

Cf. Phil. 3:14.

in an earnest expectation of all the good things which God hath prepared for them that love him.
105

1 Cor. 2:9.

1212. Dost thou now believe? Then ‘the love of God is’ now ‘shed abroad in thy heart.’

106

Cf. Rom. 5:5.

Thou lovest him, because he first loved us.
107

See 1 John 4:19.

And because thou lovest God, thou lovest thy brother also.
108

See 1 John 4:21.

And being filled with ‘love, peace, joy’, thou art also filled with ‘long-suffering, gentleness, fidelity, goodness, meekness, temperance’,
109

Gal. 5:22-23.

and all the other fruits of the same Spirit—in a word, with whatever dispositions are holy, are heavenly or divine. For while thou ‘beholdest with open (uncovered) face’ (the veil now being taken away) ‘the glory of the Lord’, his glorious love, and the glorious image wherein thou wast created, thou art ‘changed into the same image, from glory to glory, by the Spirit of the Lord’.
110

2 Cor. 3:18.

1313. This repentance, this faith, this peace, joy, love; this change from glory to glory, is what the wisdom of the world has voted to be madness, mere enthusiasm, utter distraction.

111

An echo of charges, chiefly against Whitefield, by various critics like The Weekly Advertiser (June 13, 1741), Joseph Trapp, The Nature, Folly, Sin, and Danger of Being Righteous Overmuch (1739), Richard Smalbroke (Bishop of Lichfield), and others. Cf. Green, Anti-Methodist Publications, for 1739-45. See also No. 10, ‘The Witness of the Spirit, I’, §1 and n.

But thou, O man of God, regard them not: be thou moved by none of these things. Thou knowest in whom thou hast believed.
112

See 2 Tim. 1:12.

See that no man take thy crown.
113

Rev. 3:11.

Whereunto thou hast already attained, hold fast, and follow, till thou attain all the great and precious promises. And thou who hast not yet known him, let not vain men make thee ashamed of the gospel of Christ. Be thou in nothing terrified by those who speak evil of the things which they know not. God will soon turn thy heaviness into joy. O let not thy hands 232hang down. Yet a little longer, and he will take away thy fears, and give thee the spirit of a sound mind. ‘He is nigh that justifieth:’
114

Cf. Isa. 50:8.

‘Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died; yea, rather, that rose again; who is even now at the right hand of God, making intercession for thee.’
115

Cf. Rom. 8:34.

Now cast thyself on the Lamb of God, with all thy sins, how many soever they be; and ‘an entrance shall now be ministered unto thee into the kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ’!
116

Cf. 2 Pet. 1:11.


How to Cite This Entry

, “” in , last modified February 24, 2024, https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon007.

Bibliography:

, “.” In , edited by . , 2024. Entry published February 24, 2024. https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon007.

About this Entry

Entry Title: Sermon 7: The Way to the Kingdom

Copyright and License for Reuse

Except otherwise noted, this page is © 2024.
Show full citation information...