Notes:
1Rom. 5:1.
2Cf. Rom. 3:24.
1 Cor. 2:12.
3Cf. Rom. 8:16.
2 Cor. 1:12.
4Cf. 2 Pet. 3:16.
5Titus 1:1.
6Cf. 2 Pet. 3:16.
7Cf. Rom. 8:1.
8Cf. Phil. 3:9.
9Eph. 1:7; Col. 1:14.
10Cf.1 John 4:13.
111 Cor. 6:17.
12See John 15:4-5.
13See 1 Cor. 12:12-27; John 15:1-8.
141 John 3:6.
Gal. 5:19.
Ver. 16.
15Cf. Gal. 5:17, as in TR: Wesley’s printers introduced a medley of variant breathings and accents (e.g., Pine [1771] ἴνα μὴ ἅ ἁν θέλητε). Modern critical edns. read ἐὰν instead of the contraction, ἄν, and most modern translators take the whole phrase as a negative subjunctive, meaning ‘so that what you will to do you cannot do’ (NEB); cf. Goodspeed, Knox, etc. Wesley will not have it so: our moral disabilities are not part of God’s original design for mankind; always, a remnant of freedom (and, therefore, of responsibility) remains. Cf. Nos. 13, On Sin in Believers, I.3, IV.7; and 43, The Scripture Way of Salvation, III.6.
16Cf. Gal. 5:24.
171 John 2:27, 28.
18Cf. Gal. 5:24.
19Gal. 5:19-21.
20Heb. 12:15.
21Cf. ibid.
22Cf. 1 Cor. 15:57.
23John 4:14.
24See Zech. 14:20-21; Jer. 2:3.
25Cf. Col. 4:6.
26Cf. Eph. 4:29.
27Cf. 1 Pet. 2:21.
28Cf. 1 Cor. 10:31.
29Gal. 5:22-23.
30See Phil. 4:8.
31Cf. Titus 2:10.
32Cf. Rom. 8:11.
33Cf. Mic. 7:19.
34Cf. Rom. 3:25.
35See Acts 7:60; Rom. 8:33.
36Ps. 9:6.
37Cf. 1 John 5:10.
38See Heb. 12:24.
39Cf. Rom. 8:15.
40Cf. Rom. 5:1.
411 Pet. 3:21.
42See Heb. 11:27.
43Cf. 2 Cor. 1:9.
44Note the ‘third alternative’ here to the polarities of over-anxious consciences, on the one hand, and to the ‘perseverance of the saints’, on the other. Assurance (‘the light of faith’) is a gift; it may be lost and yet also recovered. It is interesting to see how tenaciously Wesley argued against ‘final perseverance’, as in Predestination Calmly Considered, 72-86, and Nos. 13, On Sin in Believers; 41, Wandering Thoughts; 46, ‘The Wilderness State’; and 47, ‘Heaviness through Manifold Temptations’. See also how skilfully he edits his Puritan authors in A Christian Library, quietly omitting their arguments for it, as in Manton (1620-77), Sermons on Several Subjects, in Vol. 12.
45Cf. 1 John 5:3 and Notes.
461 John 3:9.
471 John 5:18.
Gal. 5:18.
48Exod. 20:15.
49Exod. 20:8.
Ver. 23.
1 Tim. 1:8-9, 11. [κεῖται, from κεῖμαι, means ‘to lie’ or ‘to lean’, as Wesley has it here (pace Sugden, I.169 and n.). Its figurative meaning is ‘to be valid’ or ‘relevant’. The clause may thus be translated, ‘The Law has no valid bearing on behaviour at this level…’ (which is Wesley’s point). Cf. Arndt and Gingrich, Greek-English Lexicon, p. 428; see also Wesley’s Notes on this ver.]
1 Cor. 1:2.
Ver. 9.
1 Cor. 3:1.
50Rom. 8:7.
51Jer. 17:9.
52A reference to Wesley’s crucial distinction between wilful or deliberate sin (viz., ‘a voluntary transgression of a known law of God’ as in Nos. 19, ‘The Great Privilege of those that are Born of God’, II.2-3; and 76, ‘On Perfection’, III.9) and a faithful Christian’s ‘sincere but imperfect obedience’. See below, No. 13, On Sin in Believers, intro., III.1-9 and n.
1 John 3:[21], 24.
53Cf. No. 41, Wandering Thoughts.
54Heb. 12:24.
551 John 2:1.
56Heb. 7:25.
57Cf. Col. 2:6.
58Cf. Thomas Westfield, ‘Sermon at St. Bartholomew the Great, on 2 Sam. 5:3’ (1628); Richard Kidder (Bishop of Bath and Wells), ‘A Discourse Concerning Sins of Infirmity and Wilful Sins’ (1704), pp. 3-33; and Lucas, Enquiry After Happiness, II.178; III.23 , 296. Reformed theologians, generally, rejected the Catholic distinction between ‘mortal’ (wilful) sins and ‘venial’ (involuntary) sins. But see the list of sins in Johannes Heidegger, Corpus Theologiae (1700), V.61-71 (§§26-27), where No. 8 pertains to ‘sins of weakness’ (i.e., ‘ignorance’, etc. ). See also J. A. Quendstedt, Theologia Didactico-Polemica (1685), II.70: ‘Sins of infirmity, which overtake the regenerate without any certain purpose of sinning. Such are sinful emotions of the mind, which have suddenly arisen without their will, and whatever unlawful words or deeds are the result of inadvertence or precipitancy, and contrary to the purposes of one’s will.’
59See Rom. 12:1, 2.
602 Cor. 8:12.
61Cf. Ps. 42:1-2 (BCP).
62Matt. 26:39, etc.
63Ps. 42:4 (BCP).
64Cf. Ps. 42:6-7 (BCP).
65Cf. Law, Serious Call, (p. 21), where Law is sure that God ‘will be merciful to our unavoidable weaknesses and infirmities’, including those surprising discoveries of residual sins of which we have not yet repented. His aim is ‘to excite [Christians] to an earnest examination of their lives…, etc.’. Wesley stresses, more stringently than Law, the dangers of such ‘sudden assaults’ (see below, II.13) and, consequently, the importance of constant alertness to their disclosures. But here, again, the crucial issue is the vexed question of the borderline between involuntary shortfallings and wilful sins.
66Lev. 19:18, etc.
67Cf. Prov. 6:10; 24:33.
68See Phil. 2:5.
69Ps. 103:13 (BCP).
70Isa. 12:2.
71Cf. Matt. 8:26.
72Ps. 139:18.
73Rom. 8:33-34.
74Eph. 1:6.
75See Hos. 13:3.
76John 3:6, 8.
772 Tim. 1:7.
78Eph. 1:7; Col.1:14.
79Job 42:6.
80Job 19:25.
81Cf. Gal. 2:20.
82Cf. Gal. 5:1.
83Ibid.
841 John 3:20.
85Ibid.
861 John 3 :8. A sharp denial of the notion popularly associated with Calvinism: ‘once in grace, always in grace.’ Here, again, is Wesley’s insistence that only wilful sin forfeits grace. But even wilful sins may be repented and forgiven.
87See Jer. 6:14; 8:11.
88See Ps. 130:1 (BCP).
89Cf. Jer. 3:22.
90Cf. Gal. 5:6; cf. also, No. 2, The Almost Christian, II.6 and n.
91Notice Wesley’s version here of Luther’s simul justus et peccator and his different nuancing of it. See above, II.6; and No. 13, On Sin in Believers, intro., III.1-9 and n.
92See 1 Cor. 13:12.
93See Rom. 12:3.
94Charles Wesley, ‘Waiting for Christ the Prophet’, st. 5, in Hymns and Sacred Poems (1742), p. 209 (Poet. Wks., II.263).
95Cf. Isa. 40:17.
96Cf. John 14:27.
971 John 2:1.
98Cf. Ps. 103:11.
99See Luke 18:13.
100Matt. 7:11.
101Cf. 2 Cor. 7:1.
102Mark 12:30; Luke 10:27.
103Cf. Heb. 10:23.
104Cf. Isa. 9:7; note this whole paragraph as a comment on the meaning of a believer’s assurance, despite the remains of sin in believers (for which, see No. 13). It is equally an exhortation to the constant repentance of believers (for which, see No. 14).
105Cf. 2 Cor. 2:11.
106An echo of Law’s stress on God’s mercifulness toward all Christians who hold to their trust in Christ’s sufficient merit and grace: ‘Weak and imperfect men shall, notwithstanding their frailties and defects, be received as having pleased God, if they have done their utmost to please him…. We cannot offer to God the service of angels [or of] man in a state of perfection; but fallen men can do their best, and this is the perfection that is required of us’ (Serious Call, Works, IV.23-24).
107See Isa. 14:12.
108Cf. Heb. 12:1.
109See Ps. 62:8.
110Cf. Heb.4:15.
111See 1 Pet. 5:10.
112Cf. 1 John 4:18.
113Cf. Jas. 1:4.
1141 Thess. 5:23.
Sermon 8: The First-Fruits of the Spirit
233
An Introductory CommentWesley’s accent on salvation by faith as salvation from sin had already raised the question of ‘sin in believers’ and had involved him in the tortured debates about the residues of sin in the believer (fomes peccati) after justification and reconciliation. The classical Protestant doctrine of invincible concupiscence had supported Luther’s characterization of the Christian as simul justus et peccator (see No. 13, On Sin in Believers). But this collided with Wesley’s holy living tradition, and it deferred entire sanctification until in statu gloriae (‘in the state of glory only’). It also fed the flames of scrupulosity, so that one of the marks of Puritan examinations of conscience had come to be self-accusation and self-reproach.
In this sermon (one of only five recorded uses of Rom. 8:1; another in 1741, two in 1745, and one in 1760) Wesley is wrestling with the problem of Christian self-accusation. It is a problem for those who already profess faith in Christ but who retain their guilty memories and are still aware of continued shortfallings.
Here, then, is an early statement of Wesley’s ‘third alternative’ to two extremes: of Christians, on the one hand, who might continue in sin and still plead Christ’s atoning mercies, and Christians, on the other, who sag toward despair under the weight of their guilt-ridden consciences. The crucial distinction is between wilful sins—lapses for which guilt and repentance are the sinner’s only hope—and the residue of sin in believers for which ‘there is therefore now no condemnation in Christ Jesus’. It is this sort of surcease from guilt and anxiety that Wesley here identifies as ‘the first-fruits of the Spirit’. This, then, is a preparatory essay on the paradox of a Christian’s sensitivity (in repentance) and serenity (in grace). Thus it belongs with Christian Perfection and its qualifiers (Wandering Thoughts, On Sin in Believers, and The Repentance of Believers) as part of Wesley’s composite doctrine of salvation as pardon and of its fruits as a deliverance of the Christian conscience from anxiety and guilt.
Yet another angle of the same, ancient controversy may be seen in Wesley’s rejection of the Calvinist contention for ‘the perseverance of the 234saints’. For Wesley, the way from the threshold to the plerophory of faith is a risky one, chiefly because the residues of sin are forever capable of thrusting themselves up to the level of direct temptation or even something like unconscious control. Christians walk in the certainties of grace with the assurance that sins repented are always forgivable, but they must always be alert lest the ‘remains of sin’ turn into wilful sins (which, unrepented, lead to backsliding). Here then, is an early sample of Wesley’s lifelong endeavour to hold both ‘faith alone’ and ‘holy living’ in the same integrated vision of Christian existence.
The First-fruits of the SpiritRomans 8:1
There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
11. By ‘them which are in Christ Jesus’ St. Paul evidently means those who truly believe in him; those who ‘being justified by faith, have peace with God, through our Lord Jesus Christ’.
They who thus believe do no longer ‘walk after the flesh’, no longer follow the motions of corrupt nature, but ‘after the Spirit’. Both their thoughts, words, and works are under the direction of the blessed Spirit of God.22. ‘There is therefore now no condemnation to’ these. There is no condemnation to them from God, for he hath ‘justified them freely by his grace, through the redemption that is in Jesus’.
He hath forgiven all their iniquities, and blotted out all their sins. And there is no condemnation to them from within, for they ‘have received, not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit which is of God, that they might know the things which are freely given to them of God’:1 Cor. 2:12.
2 Cor. 1:12.
33. But because this Scripture has been so frequently misunderstood, and that in so dangerous a manner; because such multitudes of ‘unlearned and unstable men’ (οἱ ἀμαθεῖς καὶ ἀστήρικτοι,
men untaught of God, and consequently unestablished in ‘the truth which is after godliness’) have ‘wrested it to their own destruction’; I propose to show as clearly as I can, first, who those are ‘which are in Christ Jesus, and walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit’; and secondly, how ‘there is no condemnation to’ these. I shall conclude with some practical inferences. 11I. 1. First, I am to show who those are that ‘are in Christ Jesus’. And are they not those who believe in his name? Those who are ‘found in him, not having their own righteousness, but the righteousness which is of God by faith’?
These, who ‘have redemption through his blood’, are properly said to be ‘in him’, for they ‘dwell in Christ and Christ in them’. They are ‘joined unto the Lord in one Spirit’. They are engrafted into him as branches into the vine. They are united, as members to their head, in a manner which words cannot express, nor could it before enter into their hearts to conceive.22. Now ‘whosoever abideth in him sinneth not,’
‘walketh not after the flesh’. The flesh, in the usual language of St. Paul, signifies corrupt nature. In this sense he uses the word, writing to the Galatians, ‘The works of the flesh are manifest;’Gal. 5:19.
Ver. 16.
33. ‘They who are of Christ’,
who ‘abide in him’, ‘have crucified the flesh with its affections and lusts.’ They abstain from all those works of the flesh: from ‘adultery and fornication’; from ‘uncleanness and lasciviousness’; from ‘idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance’; from ‘emulations, wrath, strife, sedition, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings’—from every design, and word, and work to which the corruption of nature leads. Although they feel the root of bitterness in themselves, yet are they endued with power from on high to trample it continually under foot, so that it cannot ‘spring up to trouble them’: insomuch that every fresh assault which they undergo only gives them fresh occasion of praise, of crying out, ‘Thanks be unto God, who giveth us the victory, through Jesus Christ our Lord.’44. They now ‘walk after the Spirit’ both in their hearts and lives. They are taught of him to love God and their neighbour with a love which is as ‘a well of water, springing up into everlasting life’.
And by him they are led into every holy desire, into every divine and heavenly temper, till every thought which arises in their heart is holiness unto the Lord.55. They who ‘walk after the Spirit’ are also led by him into all holiness of conversation. Their speech is ‘always in grace, seasoned with salt’,
with the love and fear of God. ‘No corrupt communication comes out of their mouth, but (only) that which is good;’ that which is ‘to the use of edifying’, which is ‘meet to 237minister grace to the hearers’. And herein likewise do they exercise themselves day and night to do only the things which please God; in all their outward behaviour to follow him who ‘left us an example that we might tread in his steps’; in all their intercourse with their neighbour to walk in justice, mercy, and truth; and ‘whatsoever they do’, in every circumstance of life, to ‘do all to the glory of God.’66. These are they who indeed ‘walk after the Spirit’. Being filled with faith and with the Holy Ghost, they possess in their hearts, and show forth in their lives, in the whole course of their words and actions, the genuine fruits of the Spirit of God, namely, ‘love, joy, peace, long-suffering, gentleness, goodness, fidelity, meekness, temperance’,
and whatsoever else is lovely or praiseworthy. They ‘adorn in all things the gospel of God our Saviour’; and give full proof to all mankind that they are indeed actuated by the same Spirit ‘which raised up Jesus from the dead’. 21II. 1. I proposed to show, in the second place, how ‘there is no condemnation to them which are’ thus ‘in Christ Jesus’, and thus ‘walk, not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.’
And, first, to believers in Christ walking thus ‘there is no condemnation’ on account of their past sins. God condemneth them not for any of these; they are as though they had never been; they are ‘cast as a stone into the depth of the sea’,
and he remembereth them no more. God having ‘set forth his Son to be a propitiation for them, through faith in his blood, hath declared unto them his righteousness, for the remission of the sins that are past’. He layeth therefore none of these to their charge; their memorial is perished with them.22. And there is no condemnation in their own breast, no sense of guilt, or dread of the wrath of God. They ‘have the witness in themselves’;
they are conscious of their interest in the blood of sprinkling. They ‘have not received again the spirit of bondage unto fear’, unto doubt and racking uncertainty; but they ‘have 238received the Spirit of adoption, crying in their hearts, Abba, Father’. Thus ‘being justified by faith, they have the peace’ of God ruling in their hearts, flowing from a continual sense of his pardoning mercy, and ‘the answer of a good conscience toward God’.33. If it be said, ‘But sometimes a believer in Christ may lose his sight of the mercy of God; sometimes such darkness may fall upon him that he no longer sees him that is invisible,
no longer feels that witness in himself of his part in the atoning blood; and then he is inwardly condemned, he hath again “the sentence of death in himself”.’ I answer, supposing it so to be, supposing him not to see the mercy of God, then he is not a believer; for faith implies light, the light of God shining upon the soul. So far therefore as anyone loses this light, he for the time loses his faith. And no doubt a true believer in Christ may lose the light of faith. And so far as this is lost he may for a time fall again into condemnation. But this is not the case of them who now ‘are in Christ Jesus’, who now believe in his name. For so long as they believe and walk after the Spirit neither God condemns them nor their own heart.44. They are not condemned, secondly, for any present sins, for now transgressing the commandments of God. For they do not transgress them; they do not ‘walk after the flesh, but after the Spirit’. This is the continual proof of their ‘love of God, that they keep his commandments’:
even as St. John bears witness, ‘Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin. For his seed remaineth in him, and he cannot sin, because he is born of God;’ he cannot so long as that seed of God, that loving, holy faith, remaineth in him. So long as ‘he keepeth himself’ herein ‘that wicked one toucheth him not.’ Now it is evident he is not condemned for the sins which he doth not commit at all. They 239therefore who are thus ‘led by the Spirit are not under the law’:Gal. 5:18.
Ver. 23.
1 Tim. 1:8-9, 11. [κεῖται, from κεῖμαι, means ‘to lie’ or ‘to lean’, as Wesley has it here (pace Sugden, I.169 and n.). Its figurative meaning is ‘to be valid’ or ‘relevant’. The clause may thus be translated, ‘The Law has no valid bearing on behaviour at this level…’ (which is Wesley’s point). Cf. Arndt and Gingrich, Greek-English Lexicon, p. 428; see also Wesley’s Notes on this ver.]
55. They are not condemned, thirdly, for inward sin, even though it does now remain. That the corruption of nature does still remain, even in those who are the children of God by faith; that they have in them the seeds of pride and vanity, of anger, lust and evil desire, yea, sin of every kind, is too plain to be denied, being matter of daily experience. And on this account it is that St. Paul, speaking to those whom he had just before witnessed to be ‘in Christ Jesus’,
1 Cor. 1:2.
Ver. 9.
1 Cor. 3:1.
Rom. 8:7.
6 2406. And yet for all this they are not condemned. Although they feel the flesh, the evil nature in them; although they are more sensible day by day that their ‘heart is deceitful, and desperately wicked’;
Jer. 17:9.
A reference to Wesley’s crucial distinction between wilful or deliberate sin (viz., ‘a voluntary transgression of a known law of God’ as in Nos. 19, ‘The Great Privilege of those that are Born of God’, II.2-3; and 76, ‘On Perfection’, III.9) and a faithful Christian’s ‘sincere but imperfect obedience’. See below, No. 13, On Sin in Believers, intro., III.1-9 and n.
1 John 3:[21], 24.
77. Nay, fourthly, although they are continually convinced of sin cleaving to all they do; although they are conscious of not fulfilling the perfect law, either in their thoughts, or words, or works; although they know they do not love the Lord their God with all their heart, and mind, and soul, and strength; although they feel more or less of pride or self-will stealing in and mixing with their best duties; although even in their more immediate intercourse with God, when they assemble themselves with the great congregation, and when they pour out their souls in secret to him who seeth all the thoughts and intents of the heart, they are continually ashamed of their wandering thoughts,
Cf. No. 41, Wandering Thoughts.
Heb. 12:24.
1 John 2:1.
Heb. 7:25.
Cf. Col. 2:6.
88. They are not condemned, fifthly, for ‘sins of infirmity’, as they are usually called.
Cf. Thomas Westfield, ‘Sermon at St. Bartholomew the Great, on 2 Sam. 5:3’ (1628); Richard Kidder (Bishop of Bath and Wells), ‘A Discourse Concerning Sins of Infirmity and Wilful Sins’ (1704), pp. 3-33; and Lucas, Enquiry After Happiness, II.178; III.23 , 296. Reformed theologians, generally, rejected the Catholic distinction between ‘mortal’ (wilful) sins and ‘venial’ (involuntary) sins. But see the list of sins in Johannes Heidegger, Corpus Theologiae (1700), V.61-71 (§§26-27), where No. 8 pertains to ‘sins of weakness’ (i.e., ‘ignorance’, etc. ). See also J. A. Quendstedt, Theologia Didactico-Polemica (1685), II.70: ‘Sins of infirmity, which overtake the regenerate without any certain purpose of sinning. Such are sinful emotions of the mind, which have suddenly arisen without their will, and whatever unlawful words or deeds are the result of inadvertence or precipitancy, and contrary to the purposes of one’s will.’
See Rom. 12:1, 2.
99. Lastly, ‘there is no condemnation’ to them for anything whatever which it is not in their power to help; whether it be of an inward or outward nature, and whether it be doing something or leaving something undone. For instance, the Lord’s Supper is to be administered, but you do not partake thereof. Why do you not? You are confined by sickness; therefore you cannot help omitting it—and for the same reason you are not condemned. There is no guilt, because there is no choice. As there is ‘a willing mind, it is accepted, according to that a man hath, not according to that he hath not’.
2 Cor. 8:12.
10 24210. A believer indeed may sometimes be grieved because he cannot do what his soul longs for. He may cry out, when he is detained from worshipping God in the great congregation, ‘Like as the hart panteth after the water brooks, so panteth my soul after thee, O God. My soul is athirst for God, yea even for the living God. When shall I come to appear in the presence of God?’
Cf. Ps. 42:1-2 (BCP).
Matt. 26:39, etc.
Ps. 42:4 (BCP).
Cf. Ps. 42:6-7 (BCP).
1111. It is more difficult to determine concerning those which are usually styled ‘sins of surprise’:
Cf. Law, Serious Call, (p. 21), where Law is sure that God ‘will be merciful to our unavoidable weaknesses and infirmities’, including those surprising discoveries of residual sins of which we have not yet repented. His aim is ‘to excite [Christians] to an earnest examination of their lives…, etc.’. Wesley stresses, more stringently than Law, the dangers of such ‘sudden assaults’ (see below, II.13) and, consequently, the importance of constant alertness to their disclosures. But here, again, the crucial issue is the vexed question of the borderline between involuntary shortfallings and wilful sins.
Lev. 19:18, etc.
1212. But if so, then there may be some sins of surprise which bring much guilt and condemnation. For in some instances our being surprised is owing to some wilful and culpable neglect; or to a sleepiness of soul which might have been prevented, or shaken off before the temptation came. A man may be previously warned, either of God or man, that trials and danger are at hand, and yet may say in his heart, ‘A little more slumber, a little more 243folding of the hands to rest.’
Cf. Prov. 6:10; 24:33.
1313. On the other hand, there may be sudden assaults either from the world, or the god of this world, and frequently from our own evil hearts, which we did not, and hardly could foresee. And by these even a believer, while weak in faith, may possibly be borne down, suppose into a degree of anger, or thinking evil of another, with scarce any concurrence of his will. Now in such a case the jealous God would undoubtedly show him that he had done foolishly. He would be convinced of having swerved from the perfect law, from the mind which was in Christ,
See Phil. 2:5.
Ps. 103:13 (BCP).
Isa. 12:2.
1III. 1. It remains only to draw some practical inferences from the preceding considerations.
And, first, if there be ‘no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus’, and ‘walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit’, on account of their past sins; then ‘Why art thou fearful, O thou of little faith?’
Cf. Matt. 8:26.
Ps. 139:18.
Rom. 8:33-34.
Eph. 1:6.
See Hos. 13:3.
John 3:6, 8.
2 Tim. 1:7.
22. Wilt thou say, ‘But I have again committed sin, since I had redemption through his blood;
Eph. 1:7; Col.1:14.
Job 42:6.
Job 19:25.
Cf. Gal. 2:20.
Cf. Gal. 5:1.
Ibid.
33. But, secondly, do all they which abide ‘in Christ Jesus walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit’? Then we cannot but infer that whosoever now committeth sin hath no part or lot in this matter. He is even now condemned by his own heart. But ‘if our heart condemn us’,
1 John 3:20.
Ibid.
1 John 3 :8. A sharp denial of the notion popularly associated with Calvinism: ‘once in grace, always in grace.’ Here, again, is Wesley’s insistence that only wilful sin forfeits grace. But even wilful sins may be repented and forgiven.
See Jer. 6:14; 8:11.
See Ps. 130:1 (BCP).
Cf. Jer. 3:22.
Cf. Gal. 5:6; cf. also, No. 2, The Almost Christian, II.6 and n.
44. Thirdly, is there no condemnation to them which ‘walk after the Spirit’ by reason of inward sin still remaining, so long as they do not give way thereto; nor by reason of sin cleaving to all they do? Then fret not thyself because of ungodliness, though it still remain in thy heart.
Notice Wesley’s version here of Luther’s simul justus et peccator and his different nuancing of it. See above, II.6; and No. 13, On Sin in Believers, intro., III.1-9 and n.
See 1 Cor. 13:12.
See Rom. 12:3.
Charles Wesley, ‘Waiting for Christ the Prophet’, st. 5, in Hymns and Sacred Poems (1742), p. 209 (Poet. Wks., II.263).
But when he heareth thy prayer, and unveils thy heart, when he shows thee throughly what spirit thou art of; then beware that thy faith fail thee not, that thou suffer not thy shield to be torn from thee. Be abased. Be humbled in the dust. See thyself 246nothing, less than nothing, and vanity.
Cf. Isa. 40:17.
Cf. John 14:27.
1 John 2:1.
Cf. Ps. 103:11.
See Luke 18:13.
Matt. 7:11.
Cf. 2 Cor. 7:1.
Mark 12:30; Luke 10:27.
Cf. Heb. 10:23.
Cf. Isa. 9:7; note this whole paragraph as a comment on the meaning of a believer’s assurance, despite the remains of sin in believers (for which, see No. 13). It is equally an exhortation to the constant repentance of believers (for which, see No. 14).
55. Fourthly, if they that ‘are in Christ and walk after the Spirit’ are not condemned for sins of infirmity, as neither for involuntary failings, nor for anything whatever which they are not able to help; then beware, O thou that hast faith in his blood, that Satan herein ‘gain no advantage over thee’.
Cf. 2 Cor. 2:11.
An echo of Law’s stress on God’s mercifulness toward all Christians who hold to their trust in Christ’s sufficient merit and grace: ‘Weak and imperfect men shall, notwithstanding their frailties and defects, be received as having pleased God, if they have done their utmost to please him…. We cannot offer to God the service of angels [or of] man in a state of perfection; but fallen men can do their best, and this is the perfection that is required of us’ (Serious Call, Works, IV.23-24).
See Isa. 14:12.
Cf. Heb. 12:1.
66. Lastly, since a believer need not come into condemnation, even though he be surprised into what his soul abhors (suppose his being surprised is not owing to any carelessness or wilful neglect of his own); if thou who believest art thus overtaken in a fault, then grieve unto the Lord: it shall be a precious balm. Pour out thy heart before him,
See Ps. 62:8.
Cf. Heb.4:15.
See 1 Pet. 5:10.
Cf. 1 John 4:18.
Cf. Jas. 1:4.
1 Thess. 5:23.
How to Cite This Entry
Bibliography:
, “.” In , edited by . , 2024. Entry published February 24, 2024. https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon008.About this Entry
Entry Title: Sermon 8: The First-Fruits of the Spirit