Notes:
Sermon 18: The Marks of the New Birth
With SOSO, I, Wesley could suppose that he had established the basis for his doctrine of justification by faith alone, understood as the threshold of true religion. Taking this then as given—with occasioned short reaffirmations, as in I.3 below—he was free to devote the remainder of his collection to the problems of the ongoing Christian life, from its beginnings in saving faith to its fullness in perfect love. This is evident in the ordering of the sermons; they are out of their chronological sequence, but they have their own logic. Thus, after ‘The Circumcision of the Heart’ Wesley adds a pair of sermons about regeneration, understood as that act of grace concurrent with justification but not at all identical to it—a ‘vast inward change’ that opens up the lifelong quest for holiness.
In the first of the pair (as also later in No. 45, ‘The New Birth’) Wesley wrestles with an unresolved dilemma in his beliefs and teachings. He had been brought up to take baptismal regeneration for granted, as in the office for Baptism in the BCP, in Art. XXVII (‘Of Baptism’), and in his father’s ‘Of Baptism’ in The Pious Communicant Rightly Prepared (1700), which he would thereafter abridge and publish in his own name (1758). John seems always to have believed that something ‘happens’ in baptism (and in infant baptism at that) that validates its propriety and necessity as the sacrament of Christian initiation; he rejected the logic of ‘believer’s baptism’ which always presupposes ‘conversion’ before baptism.
Even so, his own experience and the dramatic conversions in the Revival had forced on him a recognition of yet another sort of regeneration, more decisive and subjective, more nearly correlated with justification and assurance than with water baptism. Thus, somewhat as he had explained ‘the circumcision of the heart’ as a personal transformation following baptism, so now, in ‘The Marks of the New Birth’ and ‘The Great Privilege of those that are Born of God’ (and again, later, in No. 45, ‘The New Birth’), he was in search of a doctrine of regeneration that would take seriously the realities of evangelical 416conversions and yet not repudiate his own sacramental traditions. Whether he ever fully succeeded is an open question; it is undeniable that the doctrine of infant baptism as an objective divine action has never had more than a tenuous place in the Methodist tradition. (For a fuller probing of the theological problem of baptism and regeneration, cf. Robert E. Cushman, ‘Baptism and the Family of God’, in Dow Kirkpatrick, ed., The Doctrine of the Church [New York, Abingdon, 1964], pp. 79-102.)
All this, then, was part of the context of Wesley’s direct concern in these two sermons, the special ‘powers’ (or ‘privileges’, as Wesley prefers to translate ἐξουσία in John 1:12) of justified and regenerated Christians. To this end, he borrows from the analogy of latency from physical birth to point to the latent powers in the human spirit when enlivened by its Creator Spirit (cf. the ‘title’ of the Holy Spirit in the Latin text of the Nicene Creed: Vivificator). Just as the ‘circumcision of the heart’ had involved ‘humility, faith, hope, and charity’, so also ‘the [distinctive] marks of the New Birth’ are ‘faith, hope, and love’.
In expounding this Christian commonplace, however, Wesley comes, under the heading of ‘faith’, to his crucial assertion that the regenerate believer receives real power (or ‘the privilege’) not to commit sin, and so to enjoy unanxious peace in heart and mind. Here Wesley comes as close as he ever will to an unnuanced notion of Christian existence as sinless; he even goes on to denounce those who try to qualify this with the more modest claim that the regenerate ‘do not commit sin habitually’ (I.5). He must have realized, however, that he had laid himself open to misinterpretation, and so he proceeded to add ‘The Great Privilege of those that are Born of God’, and with it a more careful distinction between ‘sin properly so called’ and other shortfallings, i.e., between voluntary and involuntary sins, where ‘voluntary’ sounds suspiciously like ‘habitual’. After that he can develop his metaphor of a spiritual sensorium and his concept of human ‘re-actions’ to divine ‘actions’. This would suggest that the two sermons are better read as a pair than apart.
Both seem to have been written versions of Wesley’s oral preaching, reaching back to the beginnings of the Revival. It is recorded that he had preached from John 3:8 as early as June 10, 1739, and frequently thereafter (fourteen times in all until December 1757). His first recorded sermon from 1 John 3:9 comes on September 23, 1739; a second comes on January 17, 1740; its last usage as a sermon text seems to have been in November 1756. Even in 1748, however, with these twin sermons, Wesley had laid out one of the undergirding premises of his unfolding vision of Christian existence.
417 The Marks of the New BirthJohn 3:8
So is everyone that is born of the Spirit.
11. How is everyone that is ‘born of the Spirit’? That is, ‘born again’, ‘born of God’?
John 3:3, 6.
Rom. 8:14-16.
22. Perhaps it is not needful to give a definition of this, seeing the Scripture gives none. But as the question is of the deepest concern to every child of man (since ‘except a man be born again’, ‘born of the Spirit’, he ‘cannot see the kingdom of God’
John 3:3.
1I. 1. The first of these (and the foundation of all the rest) is faith. So
St. Paul, ‘Ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.’
Gal.
3:26.
Cf. Notes, lot. cit., and also Poole, Annotations, loc. cit. The idea of ἐξουσία as ‘a right’ includes ‘the right to act…’ and also ‘the ability to act…’; cf. Arndt and Gingrich, Greek-English Lexicon.
John 1:12-13.
1 John 5:1.
22. But it is not a barely notional
Cf. the citation of this actual passage in OED (‘notional’); but note also that this distinction between ‘notional’ and ‘real’ was already established long before Wesley’s time (by Hooker, Bacon, Theophilus Gale, et al.). See also Samuel Johnson’s quotation from ‘Bentley’s Sermons’: ‘We must be wary, lest we ascribe any real substance or personality to this nature or chance; for it is merely a notional and imaginary thing; an abstract universal, which is properly nothing; a conception of our own making, occasioned by our reflecting upon the settled course of things; according to their essential properties, without any consciousness or intention of so doing.’
See Jas. 2:19.
See 2 Tim. 3:16; cf. also ‘Of Faith’, Homilies, p. 29.
Cf. St. Thomas, Summa Theologica, II.ii, Q. 1.
Cf. John 16:30.
Cf. Jude 6.
33. For all this is no more than a dead faith.
See also ‘Of Faith’, Pt. I, Homilies, p. 29; and Wesley’s Notes on Jas. 2:17. For ‘living faith’, cf. his letters to his mother, June 18 and Nov. 22, 1725; to William Law, May 14, 1738; and to Dr. Henry Stebbing, July 31, 1739, §6.
‘Of Salvation’, Pt. III, Homilies, p. 26.
Cf. Phil. 3:9.
Phil. 3:3, 4.
Cf. Luke 7:42.
Rom. 3:19.
‘Of Salvation’, Pt. I, Homilies, p. 20, which reads ‘for them…’.
Ibid., Pt. III, summarized.
44. An immediate and constant fruit of this faith whereby we are born of God, a fruit which can in no wise be separated from it, no, not for an hour, is power over sin: power over outward sin of every kind; over every evil word and work; for wheresoever the blood of Christ is thus applied it ‘purgeth the conscience from dead works’.
Cf. Heb. 9:14.
Cf. Acts 15:9; Jas. 4:8.
Rom. 6:2.
Cf. Rom. 6:6.
Cf. Rom. 6:11-14, 17-18. See also No. 13, On Sin in Believers, intro., III.1-9 and n.
55. The same invaluable privilege of the sons of God is as strongly asserted
by St. John; particularly with regard to the former branch of it, namely, power
over outward sin. After he had been crying out as one astonished at the depth of
the riches of the goodness of God, ‘Behold what manner of love the Father hath
bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God! […] Beloved, now are
we the sons of God; and it doth not yet appear what we shall be; but we know
that when he shall appear we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he
is’—he soon adds, ‘Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed
remaineth in him, and he cannot sin because he is born of God.’
1 John
3:1-2, 9. Ver. 6 [i.e.,9].
For a later example of this usage, cf. James Hervey, Eleven Letters…to…John Wesley (1765), p. 128: ‘True, he [the believer described in 1 John 5:18] sinneth not habitually. It is not his customary practice.’ This evidently was an echo from a conventional usage. Cf. No. 40, Christian Perfection, II.6 and n.
Cf. South, Sermons (1823), VI.81, where he quotes ‘that maxim: whatsoever is sinful is also voluntary,’ and then comments on those who restrict sin (properly so called) to ‘sinful habits’. See also Richard Hill, Logica Wesleiensis…, p. 61, where he accuses Wesley of contradicting himself between his sermon on Eph. 2:8 (Salvation by Faith) and this sermon on John 3:8; see above, No. 1. In the former, says Hill, Wesley says, ‘By any habitual sin’, etc.; in the latter, Wesley denounces those who add ‘habitually’ to the text. But see below, No. 19, ‘The Great Privilege of those that are Born of God’, II.1, where Wesley himself restricts the definition of sin to that which is ‘voluntary’. See also, No. 40, Christian Perfection, II.6.
Cf. Rev. 22:18.
Ibid.
Eph. 4:14, ‘the slight of men’. In his Notes Wesley translates this into the vernacular as ‘cogging the dice’. For ‘cogging’ as a synonym for ‘cheating’, see OED. Cf. also No. 36, ‘The Law Established through Faith, II’, I.1 and n.
See Rev. 22:19.
66. Suffer we the Apostle to interpret his own words by the whole tenor of his discourse. In the fifth verse of this chapter he had said, ‘Ye know that he (Christ) was manifested to take away our sins; and in him is no sin.’
1 John 3:5.
Ver. 7[-10].
Ver. 18.
77. Another fruit of this living faith is peace. For ‘being justified by
faith’, having all our sins blotted out, ‘we have peace with God, through our
Lord Jesus Christ.’
Rom. 5:1.
John 14:1.
John 14:27.
[John] 16:33.
Phil. 4:7.
See 1 Cor. 2:9, 14.
See Matt. 7:25; Luke 6:48.
See Phil. 4:7.
See Phil. 4:11.
Cf. Diogenes Laertius, ‘Democritus’, Lives, ix. 45, but see also, Pope, ‘Whatever is, is right’ (Essay on Man, i. 294). Charles Wesley had already borrowed this in his Hymns and Sacred Poems (1749); see also his Funeral Hymns, 1759 (Poet. Wk., V.428, VI.251). Cf. Wesley’s letter to Ebenezer Blackwell, Jan. 5, 1754; also ‘God’s time is the best time,’ in No. 42, ‘Satan’s Devices’, II.2.
Cf. Ps. 112:7 (BCP).
1II. 1. A second scriptural mark of those who are born of God is hope. Thus St. Peter, speaking to all the children of God who were then ‘scattered abroad’,
Cf. 1 Pet. 1:1.
1 Pet. 1:3.
Cf. 1 Pet. 1:15.
1 John 3:2-3.
2
4232. This hope (termed in the Epistle to the Hebrews πληροφορία
πίστεως,
Heb. 10:22. Heb. 6:11.
Works (1771), omits ‘termed…Scripture’.
2 Cor. 1:12. Cf. No. 2, The Almost Christian, I.9 and n.
Cf. Rom. 8:16-17. See Nos. 10 and 11, ‘The Witness of the Spirit’, Discourses I and II on this text; and also 12, ‘The Witness of Our Own Spirit’.
33. Let us well observe what is here taught us by God himself touching this glorious privilege of his children. Who is it that is here said to ‘bear witness’? Not our spirit only, but another; even the Spirit of God. He it is who ‘beareth witness with our spirit’. What is it he beareth witness of? ‘That we are the children of God; and if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ’—‘if so be that we suffer with him’ (if we deny ourselves, if we take up our cross daily,
See Luke 9:23.
Rom. 8:17.
Rom. 8:14-16.
44. The variation of the phrase in the fifteenth verse is worthy our observation. ‘Ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father!’ Ye—as many [as] are the sons of God—have, in virtue of your sonship, received that selfsame 424Spirit of adoption whereby we cry, Abba, Father. We, the apostles, prophets, teachers (for so the word may not improperly be understood); we, through whom you have believed, the ‘ministers of Christ, and stewards of the mysteries of God’.
1 Cor. 4:1.
See Eph. 4:4, 5.
See Eph. 1:13-14.
55. And thus is the Scripture fulfilled: ‘Blessed are they that mourn, for they shall be comforted.’
Matt. 5:4.
Cf. John 16:20.
Cf. John 16:21.
Eph. 2:12.
John 16:22 [cf. 16:24].
Rom. 5:11.
Rom. 5:2.
1 Pet. 1:3-8.
Cf. Rev. 2:17.
Job 15:11.
Cf. Job 5:22.
Cf. Rev. 1:18.
Cf. Rev. 20:3.
Rev. 21:3-4.
1III. 1. A third scriptural mark of those who are born of God, and the
greatest of all, is love: even ‘the love of God shed abroad in their hearts by
the Holy Ghost which is given unto them’.
Rom. 5:5. Gal. 4:6. 1 John 5:15.
Cf. Gen. 15:1.
Cf. John 4:34.
Ps. 63:5.
2
4262. And in this sense also ‘everyone who loveth him that begat,
loveth him that is begotten of him.’
1 John 5:1.
See Luke 1:47.
Cf. Eph. 6:24.
1 Cor. 6:17.
S. of S. 5:10; cf. 5:16 (usage in this edn. for what Wesley cited as ‘Canticles’, note x. above).
Cant. 2:16.
Ps. 45:2 [BCP].
33. The necessary fruit of this love of God is the love of our neighbour, of every soul which God hath made;
For Wesley’s definition of neighbour, cf. No. 7, ‘The Way to the Kingdom’, I.8 and n. Just as the love of God is the substance of inward holiness, so also the love of neighbour is the substance of outward holiness; cf. ibid., I.10 and n.
Cf. Matt. 5:44.
Cf. John 13:34.
Cf. John 15:12.
1 John 3:16.
Ver. 14.
[1 John] 4:13.
1 John 4:7.
4
4274. But some may possibly ask, ‘Does not the Apostle say, “This
is the love of God, that we keep his commandments”?’
1 John 5:3.
Luke 10:27.
55. A second fruit then of the love of God (so far as it can be distinguished from it) is universal obedience to him we love, and conformity to his will; obedience to all the commands of God, internal and external; obedience of the heart and of the life, in every temper and in all manner of conversation.
1 Pet. 1:15.
Titus 2:14.
Luke 14:14.
Cf. 2 Cor. 12:15.
1IV. 1. Thus have I plainly laid down those marks of the new birth which I find laid down in Scripture. Thus doth God himself answer that weighty question what it is to be born of God. Such, if the appeal be made to the oracles of God, is ‘everyone that is born of the Spirit’.
John 3:8.
Cf. 1 John 3:9.
Phil. 4:7.
Cf. 2 Cor. 1:12; 1 Pet. 3:21.
Cf. Rom. 8:16.
Cf. 1 Thess. 5:16; Rom. 5:11.
1 Thess. 1:3; Heb. 6:10.
Cf. Luke 6:36.
Cf. 1 Pet. 1:16; Lev. 11:44, 45.
Matt. 5:48.
22. Who then are ye that are thus born of God? Ye ‘know the things which are given to you of God’.
Cf. 1 Cor. 2:12.
Cf. 1 John 3:19.
John 3:5. Orig., in all edns. except Works (1771), ‘and of spirit’.
See 1 Cor. 6:19.
Col. 2:11.
Rom. 2:25. An indirect allusion to the Calvinist doctrine of perseverance and an implied rejection of it. Cf. the longer analysis of that doctrine and Wesley’s detailed refutation of it in Predestination Calmly Considered, §§63-83.
33. Say not then in your heart, I was once baptized; therefore I am 429 now a child of God.
Cf. Luther, Baptism, XI, XV, but also, XX; see also Roland Bainton, Here I Stand; A Life of Martin Luther (New York and Nashville, Abingdon-Cokesbury Press, 1950), p. 367. See above, No. 14, The Repentance of Believers, I.9 and n.
Cf. John 8:44.
Cf. Matt. 23:33. See also No. 45, ‘The New Birth’, IV.1, 2, 4.
44. How indeed, except ye be born again!
See John 3:3.
Eph. 2:1.
Cf. 1 Sam. 15:18.
Cf. 1 Sam. 15:6-20; but see also 2 Sam. 21:1-9.
Cf. No. 26, ‘Sermon on the Mount, VI’, III.12 and n.
Matt. 3:12; cf. Luke 3:17.
Cf. Luke 16:15.
Juan de Valdés—as above, No. 4, Scriptural Christianity, II.5 and n.
1 John 3:15.
Matt. 5:28.
Jas. 4:4.
55. ‘Verily, verily, I say unto you, ye also must be born again.’
Cf. John 3:3.
Ibid.
Isa. 36:6.
Cf. ‘Of Salvation’, Pt. I, ¶2, Homilies, p. 17: ‘infants being baptized…are…brought to God’s favour and made his children and inheritors of his kingdom of heaven.’ See also Rom. 8:16-17.
John 1:12.
Cf. Rom. 8:15.
66. Amen, Lord Jesus! May everyone who prepareth his heart yet again to seek thy face receive again that Spirit of adoption, and cry out, Abba, Father! Let him now again have power to believe in thy name as to become a child of God; as to know and feel he hath ‘redemption in thy blood, even the forgiveness of sins’,
Cf. Col. 1:14.
Cf. 1 John 3:9.
Cf. 1 Pet. 1:3.
Cf. 1 John 3:3.
Cf. Gal. 4:6.
Cf. 2 Cor. 7:1.
How to Cite This Entry
Bibliography:
, “.” In , edited by . , 2024. Entry published February 25, 2024. https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon018.About this Entry
Entry Title: Sermon 18: The Marks of the New Birth