Notes:
Sermon 23: Upon Our Lord’s Sermon On The Mount, Discourse III
The unifying theme of these next thirteen ‘discourses’ on the Sermon on the Mount, with all their variations and nuancings, is the Christian life understood as the fruit of justifying faith. But given such faith, what follows? Wesley’s answer is given in this extended exposition of the Christian life based on the locus classicus of evangelical ethics, ‘The Sermon on the Mount’ (i.e., Matthew 5-7). Since Tyndale, this ‘sermon’ had been understood as ‘the epitome of God’s laws and promises’ for Christian believers; cf. Clebsch, England’s Earliest Protestants, p. 184; see also William Burkitt, Expository Notes…on the New Testament (eleven editions between 1700 and 1739), Preface to chapter 5: ‘Christ’s famous Sermon on the Mount comprehends the sum and substance of both the Old and New Testaments.’
Taken together, the following sermons are not a thirteen-part essay, tightly organized and argued. Instead, they are separate sermons, drawn from materials running back to 1725, arranged in a triadic pattern that seems to have been original with Wesley. Each is a discourse in its own right; yet the series is designed so that each appears as a part of a whole. This means that the sermons may be read singly or together, but with an eye on their shared aim: ‘to assert and prove every branch of gospel obedience as indispensably necessary to eternal salvation’; cf. Wesley’s open letter (Nov. 17, 1759) to John Downes in reply to the latter’s abusive Methodism Examined and Exposed (1759).
Many of the great and near-great commentators of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries had devoted their talents to the interpretation of Matthew 5-7 as the principal summary of Christian ethics, or, in Henry Hammond’s phrase, as ‘an abstract of Christian philosophy’; cf. his Practical Catechism (1st edn., c. 1644), II.1, in the Library of Anglo-Catholic Theology (1847), p. 83. Chief among these earlier works, in the order of their influences upon Wesley’s thought, were Bishop Offspring Blackall, ‘Eighty-Seven Practical Discourses Upon Our Saviour’s Sermon on the Mount’, Works, I.1-561; II.609-939; 467John Norris, Practical Discourses; the American, James Blair, Our Saviour’s Divine Sermon on the Mount in IV Volumes (1722; 2nd edn., 1740, with a preface by Daniel Waterland); John Cardinal Bona, Guide to Eternity… (six editions in English between 1672 and 1712); and Henry Hammond, op. cit. Echoes of all these are scattered along the way, together with lesser borrowings from Bengel, Poole, and Henry. This makes it all the more remarkable that Wesley came up with a model of his own, both inform and substance. This series thus reminds us, yet again, of Wesley’s ready appeal to tradition—even while he maintains his own originality and independence.
Benjamin Ingham records in his Journal that ‘during the voyage [to Georgia] Wesley went over our Saviour’s Sermon on the Mount’ with the ship’s company aboard the Simmonds. There are also other records of his preaching, very early on, from one or another text in Matthew 5-7. For example, his second sermon was preached at Binsey (near Oxford), November 21, 1725, on Matt. 6:33. A first draft of the sermon which appears here as ‘Discourse VIII’ seems to have been written out in 1736. Later, it was the example of the Sermon on the Mount that encouraged Wesley to break out of his High Church prejudices in Bristol, April 1, 1739: ‘In the evening (Mr. Whitefield being gone) I begun expounding our Lord’s Sermon on the Mount (one pretty remarkable precedent of field preaching, though I suppose there were churches at that time also) to a little society which was accustomed to meet once or twice a week in Nicholas Street;’ cf. Journal entries for this whole story of the unplanned outbreak of the Wesleyan Revival.
The records show that, between 1739 and 1746, Wesley preached more than one hundred sermons from separate texts in the Sermon on the Mount. There is, however, no recorded instance of his having treated that Sermon as a whole anywhere else. Evidently, he was prepared to allow this series, once published, to stand as his sufficient comment on the subject.
In his introduction to ‘Discourse X’, §§1-3, Wesley repeats his explanation (cf. ‘Discourse I’, Proem, §10) of how he had conceived the design of Matthew 5-7, according to its three unfolding themes: (1) ‘the sum of true religion’; (2) ‘rules touching that right intention which we are to preserve in all our outward actions’; and (3) ‘the main hindrances of this religion’. He then adds a clarifying summary: ‘In the fifth chapter [of St. Matthew] our great Teacher…has laid before us those dispositions of the soul which constitute real Christianity…. In the sixth [chapter] he has shown how all our actions…may be made holy, and good, and acceptable to God, by a pure and holy intention…. In 468the former part of [ch. 7] he points out the most common and fatal hindrances of this holiness; in the latter [part] he exhorts us, by various motives, to break through all [such hindrances] and secure that prize of our high calling [of God in Christ Jesus]’ (cf. Phil. 3:14).
The thirteen discourses are divided almost equally over the three chapters of St. Matthew: five for chapter five, four each for six and seven. Of the first five, Discourse I is devoted to the first two Beatitudes; Discourse II to Beatitudes three through five (with a hymn to love based on 1 Cor. 13); Discourse III to the remainder of the Beatitudes; Discourse IV turns to Christianity as ‘a social religion’ in which inward holiness (our love of God) prompts outward holiness (love of neighbour); Discourse V is a balancing of law and gospel. Discourses VI-IX are based on chapter six: VI to the problems of purity and holiness of intention (to the ‘works of piety and of mercy’); VII to fasting; VIII to a denunciation of greed and surplus accumulation; IX to the mutually exclusive services of God and Mammon. Discourses X-XIII turn to various hindrances to holy living and to their avoidance: X to ‘judging’ (contrary to love), ‘intemperate zeal’, ‘neglect of prayer’, ‘neglect of charity’; XI to the noxious influences of ill-example and ill-advice with which the world deludes us; XII to false prophets and unedifying preachers (and yet also our duties to attend church nonetheless and to avail ourselves of all means of grace); XIII is an inevitable comment on the parable of the houses built on sand and rock. Discourse XII was also published separately in the same year that it appeared in SOSO, III (1750), under the title, ‘A Caution Against False Prophets. A Sermon on Matt. vii. 15-20. Particularly recommended to the People Called Methodists’. This went through seven editions during Wesley’s lifetime. For a stemma delineating the publishing history of that sermon (‘collected’ and ‘separate’) and a list of variant readings, see Appendix, ‘Wesley’s Text’, Vol. IV, see also Bibliog, Nos. 130 and 13o.i.
Obviously there is no interest, in any of these sermons, in critical textual problems or in the historical context. Everywhere it is assumed that in St. Matthew’s text we are dealing with divine ipsissima verba—i.e., with a direct address from ὁ ὤν, ‘the self-existent, the Supreme, the God who is over all, blessed for ever’ (§9 below). The Sermon on the Mount, in Wesley’s view, is the only Gospel passage where Christ designed ‘to lay down at once the whole plan of his religion, to give us a full prospect of Christianity’. What matters most in our reading, therefore, is an awareness of Wesley’s sense of the wholeness of the message he is interpreting, of his conviction of the honest integration of an evangel profoundly ethical with an ethic that is also vividly 469evangelical. Maybe more than anywhere else in SOSO this particular bloc displays Wesley’s distinctive concern for integration and balance—between the faith that justifies and the faith that works by love.
510 Upon our Lord’s Sermon on the Mount,Discourse the Third
Matthew 5:8-12
Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God.
Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Blessed are ye when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely for my sake.
Rejoice, and be exceeding glad; for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.
11I. 1. How excellent things are spoken of the love of our neighbour! It is ‘the fulfilling of the law’,
Rom. 13:10.
1 Tim. 1:5.
1 John 4:19.
Matt. 5:8.
22. ‘The pure in heart’ are they whose hearts God hath ‘purified even as he is pure’;
Cf. 1 John 3:3.
Cf. 2 Cor. 7:1.
Cf. Blackall, Discourse IX, Works, I.79: ‘By heart it is most obvious to understand the soul with all its faculties, the understanding, the will and the affections…. The “pure in heart” are they who…as strictly forbear all inward acts of sin…as they would be to forbear and avoid the open practice of wickedness….’ See also, Hammond, Practical Catechism, pp. 99-100, for a similar view and another Anglican source far Wesley’s ideas about holy living.
See Mark 12:30; Luke 10:27.
33. But how little has this ‘purity of heart’ been regarded by the false teachers of all ages! They have taught men barely to abstain from such outward impurities as God hath forbidden by name. But they did not strike at the heart; and by not guarding against, they in effect countenanced inward corruptions.
A remarkable instance of this our Lord has given us in the following words: ‘Ye
have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit
adultery.’
[Matt. 5,] ver. 27.
Matt. 15:14.
Ver. 28.
See Ps. 51:6 (BCP).
See Ps. 7:10; see Jer. 11:20.
Cf. Ps. 66:16 (BCP).
44. And God admits no excuse for retaining anything which is an occasion of
impurity. Therefore ‘if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out and cast it from
thee; for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and
not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.’
Ver. 29. Ver. 30.
Two steps only it may not be improper to take before such an absolute and final separation. First, try whether the unclean spirit may not be driven out by fasting and prayer,
Matt. 17:21; Mark 9:29.
Note the assumption here that every Christian should have his or her own ‘spiritual director’.
Gal. 1:16.
Cf. 2 Thess. 2:11.
55. Nor may marriage itself, holy and honourable as it is, be used as a pretence for giving a loose to our desires.
Cf. No. 138A, ‘On Dissimulation’, II and n.
Ver. 31-32.
All polygamy is clearly forbidden in these words, wherein our Lord expressly declares that for any woman who has a husband alive, to marry again is adultery. By parity of reason it is adultery for any man to marry again so long as he has a wife alive. Yea, although they were divorced—unless that divorce had been for the cause of adultery. In that only case there is no Scripture which forbids to marry again.
A point long debated by Anglican casuists; cf. More and Cross, Anglicanism, pp. 661-66. The governing canon was No. 107 of 1604 (Constitutions and Canons Ecclesiastical, E. Cardwell, Synodalia, I.307-8); it would seem to prevent remarriage of divorced persons in any case. Lancelot Andrewes had declared against remarriage, ‘notwithstanding [one party] hath profaned marriage with another’; cf. A Discourse…Against Second Marriage, After Sentence of Divorce… (1601), in Minor Works (in LACT), pp 106-7. Hammond, in his Practical Catechism, II. vii, had made no allowance for remarriage after divorce, even ‘in the case of fornication’. But Bishops John Cosin and Joseph Hall had allowed for the remarriage of the innocent party in the case of a divorce on the grounds of adultery; cf. Cosin’s Works (in LACT), IV.489-93, and Hall, Works (ed. Peter Hall, 1837), VII.474.
6 5136. Such is the purity of heart which God requires, and works in those who believe on the Son of his love. And ‘blessed’ are they who are thus ‘pure in heart; for they shall see God’. He will ‘manifest himself unto them’, not only ‘as he doth not unto the world’,
Cf. John 14:22.
Cf. 1 John 1:3.
See Ps. 4:6, etc.
Exod. 33:18.
Cf. No. 10, ‘The Witness of the Spirit, I’, I.12 and n.
See Eph. 1:23.
The pure in heart see all things full of God.
Aristotle, De Anima, I.5, 411a, ll. 9-10, attributes this idea to the philosopher Thales; cf. The Basic Works of Aristotle, tr. by Richard McKeon (New York, Random House, 1941), p. 553. Cicero, De Legibus, II. xi. 26, also says that it was Thales’s opinion, ‘Homines existimare oportere deos omnia cernere, deorum omnia esse plena’ (‘Men ought to believe that everything they see is full of gods’). Cf. also Virgil, Eclogues, iii.60: ‘Jovis omnia plena’, which Wesley quotes exactly in No. 118, ‘On the Omnipresence of God’, II.3. Cf. also, I.11, below; and No. 69, ‘The Imperfection of Human Knowledge’, I.2. See also Q. Aurelius Symmachus, Epistularum ad Diversos, Lib. X (Pareus edn., 1617, p. 441): Omnia quidem Deo plena sunt… [Seeck edn., 1888, pp. 281-82].
Job 31:26.
See Ps. 19:5 (BCP).
Cf. Ps. 104:3.
Cf. Ps. 147:8.
Cf. Ps. 65:11 (BCP).
Cf. Ps. 104:14.
Heb. 1:3.
Ps. 8:1, 9 (BCP).
77. In all his providences relating to themselves, to their souls or bodies, the pure in heart do more particularly see God. They see his hand ever over them for good; giving them all things in weight, and measure, numbering the hairs of their head,
See Matt. 10:30.
See Job 1:10.
88. But in a more especial manner they see God in his ordinances.
Cf. No. 16, ‘The Means of Grace’.
Cf. Ps. 96:8, 9 (BCP).
Matt. 6:6.
See 1 Cor. 11:28.
1 Cor. 11:26.
Matt. 26:64; Mark 14:62.
Cf. Exod. 33:11.
1 John 3:2.
99. But how far were they from seeing God, who having ‘heard that it had
been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt
perform unto the Lord thine oaths’,
Ver. 33.
So the Pharisees taught. They not only allowed all manner of swearing in common conversation; but accounted even forswearing a little thing, so they had not sworn by the peculiar name of God.
515But our Lord here absolutely forbids all common swearing as well as all false swearing; and shows the heinousness of both by the same awful consideration, that every creature is God’s, and he is everywhere present, in all, and over all.
‘I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven, for it is God’s throne’
Ver.
34.
See Isa. 40:22.
Ver. 35.
Ps. 48:2 (BCP).
Ver. 36.
Ver. 37.
Cf. No. 12, ‘The Witness of Our Own Spirit’, §10 and n.
1010. That our Lord does not here forbid the ‘swearing in judgment and truth’
Cf. Thirty-nine Articles, Art. XXXIX, ‘Of a Christian Man’s Oath’, to which Wesley subscribed so wholeheartedly that he reproduced it, intact, in his later abridgement of the Articles. The issue here had been posed by the Anabaptist’s stubborn refusal to take such oaths, chiefly on the grounds of this New Testament prohibition. See Williams, The Radical Reformation, pp. 125, 185, 194 ff., 594, 785; for the later controversy in England over this article itself, cf. Barbour and Roberts, Early Quaker Writings, p. 354, and the ‘testimonies against the oath’ by George Fox (p. 406) and William Penn (pp. 448-50). But see also the section on ‘Oaths’ in More and Cross, Anglicanism, pp. 672-76, where Tillotson, Taylor, and Beveridge are quoted in support of the position here taken by Wesley.
Wesley’s translation in Notes on Matt. 26:63-64; but cf. Poole, Annotations, for Jesus’s reply to Caiaphas, ‘Thou hast said the Truth…,’ and Henry’s comment, ‘It is as thou hast said’ (Exposition).
Matt. 26:63-64.
Heb. 6:17.
Cf. 1 Cor. 7:40.
Rom. 1:9.
2 Cor. 1:23.
Phil. 1:8.
Heb. 6:16.
1111. But the great lesson which our blessed Lord inculcates here, and which he illustrates by this example, is that God is in all things,
Cf. I.6, above, and n.
This will be the central theme of Wesley’s Survey of the Wisdom of God… in its three successive edns. (1763, 1770, 1777).
A phrase from John Norris, ‘Concerning Practical Atheism’, in Practical Discourses, IV.100-24. Wesley habitually used ‘practical atheism’, ‘idolatry’, and ‘dissipation’ as working synonyms. Cf. below, III.4, as well as Nos. 41, Wandering Thoughts, III.1; 44, Original Sin, II.7; 69, ‘The Imperfection of Human Knowledge’, III.2; 108, ‘On Riches’, II.1; 119, ‘Walking by Sight and Walking by Faith’, §20; 120, ‘The Unity of the Divine Being’, §§19, 20; 127, ‘On the Wedding Garment’, §12; 128, ‘The Deceitfulness of the Human Heart’, I.3, 4; and 130, ‘On Living without God’, §§1, 6, 7. Cf. also Nos. 79, ‘On Dissipation’, §1; and 78, ‘Spiritual Idolatry’. See also Charles Hickman, Sermon Before the Queen at Whitehall, Sunday, October 2, 1692, p. 7: ‘When men have conquered their conscience…they may for a while enjoy their sins in peace and live as if there were no God in the world.’
Viz., the ‘anima mundi’, one of the oldest notions of both Platonists and Stoics; it will presently be re-echoed by Wordsworth in The Prelude, I.401-4:
1II. 1. Thus far our Lord has been more directly employed in teaching the religion of the heart. He has shown what Christians are to be. He proceeds to show what they are to do also: how inward holiness is to exert itself in our outward conversation. ‘Blessed’, saith he, ‘are the peacemakers; for they shall be called the children of God.’
Matt. 5:9.
22. ‘The peacemakers’—the word in the original is οἱ εἰρηνοποιοί. It is well known that εἰρήνη in the sacred writings implies all manner of good—every blessing that relates either to the soul or the body, to time or eternity. Accordingly, when St. Paul in the titles of his epistles wishes ‘grace and peace’ to the Romans or the Corinthians it is as if he had said, ‘As a fruit of the free, undeserved love and favour of God, may you enjoy all blessings, spiritual and temporal, all the good things “which God hath prepared for them that love him.”’
1 Cor. 2:9.
33. Hence we may easily learn in how wide a sense the term ‘peacemakers’ is to be understood. In its literal meaning it implies those lovers of God and man who utterly detest and abhor all strife and debate, all variance and contention; and accordingly 518labour with all their might either to prevent this fire of hell from being kindled, or when it is kindled from breaking out, or when it is broke out from spreading any farther.
In this entire section (II.2-7) Wesley continues the hermeneutical tradition reflected in Blackall, Discourse XII, Works, I.105-14, and in Hammond, Practical Catechism, pp. 101-3.
Eph. 4:1-5.
44. But in the full extent of the word a ‘peacemaker’ is one that as he hath opportunity ‘doth good unto all men’;
Cf. Gal. 6:10. Cf. John Norris, Practical Discourses, I.126: ‘The “peacemakers” are persons of “peaceable dispositions”. And this requires: “First, that the [peacemaker] be free from all inordinate self-love; it being impossible that he who prefers his own little private concerns before the public interest should be at peace with the public when that tender part comes once to be touched. No, such an one will balance self against the world, will not care what becomes of the public when it stands in competition; but will embroil all the world in war and mischief, if he can, for the least self-advantage…”.’
See 2 Pet. 1:1.
Eph. 5:16; Col. 4:5.
Cf. Gal. 6:10.
Matt. 25:23.
55. He doth good, to the uttermost of his power, even to the bodies of all men. He rejoices to ‘deal his bread to the hungry’, and to ‘cover the naked with a garment’.
Cf. Isa. 58:7; Ezek. 18:7, 16.
Matt. 25:40.
66. How much more does he rejoice if he can do any good to the soul of any man! This power indeed belongeth unto God. It is he only that changes the heart, without which every other change is lighter than vanity.
Ps. 62:9.
1 Cor. 12:6.
Cf. Ps. 74:13 (BCP).
See 1 Cor. 3:6-7.
See Matt. 7:13.
Luke 1:79.
Cf. Hos. 4:6.
Acts 20:35; 1 Thess. 5:14.
Heb. 12:12.
Heb. 12:13.
See Luke 13:24.
Cf. Heb. 12:1.
Cf. Jude 20.
See 2 Tim. 1:12.
See 2 Tim. 1:6.
Cf. 2 Pet. 3:18.
Cf. 2 Pet. 1:11.
77. Blessed are they who are thus continually employed in the work of faith and the labour of love; ‘for they shall be called’—that is ‘shall be’ (a common Hebraism
Generally true but with important exceptions, as in Gen. 2:23; Isa. 35:8; 47:1; 54:5; 58:12; 62:2, 4, 12; Jer. 7:32; 19:6; 23:6; 33:16. But cf. Heylyn, Theological Lectures, I.71: ‘“to be called” is a frequent Hebraism signifying only an assertion that such a thing really is, or becomes, what is said to be “called”.’
Matt. 5:9.
Rom. 8:15.
Cf. Rom. 8:17.
1III. 1. One would imagine such a person as has been above described, so full of genuine humility, so unaffectedly serious, so mild and gentle, so free from all selfish design, so devoted to God, and such an active lover of men, should be the darling of mankind.
Cf. Suetonius, Lives of the Caesars (‘The Deified Titus’, I): ‘Titus, with the same surname as his father, was the delight and darling of mankind’ (‘deliciae humani generis’).
Matt. 5:10.
22. In order to understand this throughly, let us first inquire who are they that are persecuted.
Here Wesley departs from both Blackall and Hammond, who stress that ‘the persecuted’ are those who offend the world by their ‘strict and close adherence to the profession and practice of the Christian Church’; Cf. Blackall, Discourse XV, Works, I.134-41.
Gal. 4:29.
2 Tim. 3:12.
1 John 3:13-14.
John 15:18-20.
By all these Scriptures it manifestly appears who they are that are persecuted, namely the righteous: ‘he that is born after the Spirit’;
Cf. Gal. 4:29.
2 Tim. 3:12.
1 John 3:14.
John 15:19.
Gal. 6:10.
33. If it be, secondly, inquired why they are persecuted, the answer is equally plain and obvious. It is ‘for righteousness’ sake’:
Matt. 5:10.
Gal. 4:29.
2 Tim. 3:12.
John 15:19.
Matt. 5:3.
Cf. Address to the Clergy, II.1 (Bibliog, No. 216, Vol. 14 of this edn.), where Wesley speaks of ‘dull, heavy, blockish ministers’.
Matt. 5:6.
Matt. 5:8.
See Acts 3:21.
‘If they would but keep their religion to themselves it would be tolerable. But it is this spreading their errors, this infecting so many others, which is not to be endured. They do so much mischief in the world that they ought to be tolerated no longer. It is true the men do some things well enough; they relieve some of the poor. But this, too, is only done to gain the more to their party; and so in effect to do the more mischief.’ Thus the men of the world sincerely think and speak. And the more the kingdom of God prevails, the more the peacemakers are enabled to propagate lowliness, meekness, and all other divine tempers, the more mischief is done—in their account. Consequently the more are they enraged against the authors of this, and the more vehemently will they persecute them.
44. Let us, thirdly, inquire who are they that persecute them. St. Paul answers, ‘He that is born after the flesh’; everyone who is not ‘born of the Spirit’,
Cf. Gal 4:29.
2 Tim. 3:12.
1 John 3:14.
Cf. John 15:21. Ὁ κόσμος as the community of those at enmity with God is a special New Testament usage (cf. 7 in Arndt and Gingrich, Greek-English Lexicon), but it was one of Wesley’s favourites; the notable exception, of course, is in his Notes on John 3:16, 17. Generally, however, he followed the mystical tradition of contemptus mundi (Kempis, De Renty, Law); cf. Nos. 4, Scriptural Christianity, II.5 and n., for Wesley’s comments on ‘saints of the world’; and 22, ‘Sermon on the Mount, II’, II.4 and n., for ‘religion of the world’; see also No. 80, ‘On Friendship with the World’, §5. For Wesley’s satanocratic views about the world, cf. No. 12, ‘The Witness of Our Own Spirit’, §10 and n.
The reason is plain. The spirit which is in the world is directly opposite to the Spirit which is of God. It must therefore needs be that those who are of the world will be opposite to those who are of God. There is the utmost contrariety between them in all their opinions, their desires, designs, and tempers. And hitherto ‘the leopard and the kid’ cannot ‘lie down in peace together.’
Cf. Isa. 11:6.
55. Should it be inquired, fourthly, how they will persecute them, it may be answered in general, just in that manner and measure which the wise Disposer of all sees will be most for his glory, will tend most to his children’s growth in grace and the enlargement of his own kingdom. There is no one branch of God’s government of the world which is more to be admired than this. His ear is never heavy to the threatenings of the persecutor or the cry of the persecuted. His eye is ever open and his hand stretched out to direct every the minutest circumstance. When the storm shall begin, how high it shall rise, which way it shall point its course, when and how it shall end, are all determined by his unerring wisdom.
Cf. No. 67, ‘On Divine Providence’, §23 and n.
At some rare times, as when Christianity was planted first, and while it was taking root in the earth, as also when the pure doctrine of Christ began to be planted again in our nation, God permitted the storm to rise high, and his children were called to resist unto blood.
See Heb. 12:4. Cf. Tertullian, Apology, 50, §13: ‘…semen est sanguis Christianorum’ (‘nothing whatever is accomplished by your cruelties…. They are the bait that wins men for our sect. We multiply whenever we are mown down by you; the blood of Christians is seed’). This evolved into the familiar aphorism: ‘The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the Church.’
Perhaps the same observation may be made with regard to the grand persecution in our own land.
Any Englishman of the time would have recognized this as a reference to ‘Bloody Mary’ Tudor (1553-58), since John Foxe’s Book of Martyrs (first Eng. edn. in 1563) had indelibly fixed the image of Roman Catholic zeal and cruelty in English minds; John Knox’s contemptuous epithet (‘that wicked Jezebel of England’) had focused their feelings on Mary. Her cruelties, however, were scarcely more ruthless than those of her acclaimed half-sister, ‘Good Queen Bess’. But in JWJ for Mar. 13, 1747, Wesley records having read Daniel Neal’s History of the Puritans (1732-38) and being ‘amaze[d]’: ‘First, at the execrable spirit of persecution which drove [the Puritans] out of the Church, and with which Queen Elizabeth’s clergy were as deeply tinctured as ever Queen Mary’s were.’ On Apr. 26, 1786, he recounts his ‘discovery’ of Queen Elizabeth’s cruel treatment of Maty Stuart: ‘But what then was Queen Elizabeth? As just and merciful as Nero and as good a Christian as Mahomet.’ In his old age, however, he wrote to Henry Fisher (Nov. 7, 1781): ‘I do not remember that Queen Elizabeth or King James (bad as they were) burnt any heretics.’ Here he conveniently ignored the ‘forty English martyrs’ (later to be canonized in Rome in 1968). The Roman martyrology reckons 183 persons martyred for their faith during Elizabeth’s reign. Cf. No. 92, ‘On Zeal’, §1. The last Englishman burnt for heresy (by James I) was Edward Wightman (in Lichfield, Apr. 1612), a month after Bartholomew Legate had been burnt in Smithfield; the Roman Catholics martyred by Charles II were formally charged with sedition.
The boy-king, Edward VI (1547-53), who succeeded his father, Henry VIII, at the age of ten. Under guidance by the Lords Protector (first the Earl of Somerset and then the Earl of Northumberland), Edward aided the Protestant reform, chiefly by his encouragement of reformers like Thomas Cranmer, John Hooper, Nicholas Ridley. The results included the Homilies (1547), clerical marriage, and communion in both kinds (1548), a ‘reformed’ BCP (1549), followed by an even more ‘reformed’ version (1552), a Protestant Catechism and Christian Primer (1553). Wesley rightly infers that the young king had taken a personal interest in these reform measures. With his early death and the counter-reform measures of Queen Mary, the Protestant cause had been imperilled but also had become heroic. For a rather different perspective, see Carolly Erickson, Bloody Mary, pp. 226-84, 450 ff.
Isa. 5:7.
Jas. 5:4.
See Rom. 1:18.
66. But it is seldom God suffers the storm to rise so high as torture or death or bonds or imprisonment. Whereas his children are frequently called to endure those lighter kinds of persecution: they frequently suffer the estrangement of kinsfolk, the loss of the friends that were as their own soul.
See Deut. 13:6.
Luke 12:51.
77. But the persecution which attends all the children of God is that our Lord describes in the following words: ‘Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you (shall persecute by reviling you), and say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.’
Matt. 5:11.
2 Cor. 6:8.
1 Cor. 4:13.
88. Indeed some have supposed that before the fullness of the Gentiles shall come in
See Rom. 11:25.
Cf. Joseph Mede, Commentationum Apocalypticarum, in Works, III.530-32; and ‘Remains’, XI, XII, ibid., 602-5.
Cf. Prov. 16:7.
Cf. Gal. 5:11.
Cf. Gal. 1:10.
John 15:19.
An illuminating correlation of ‘preventing’ (prevenient) grace and providence. But note that here, ‘preventing’ has its more nearly common meaning of ‘hindering’ as well as ‘anticipating’.
99. It remains only to inquire, ‘How are the children of God to behave with regard to persecution?’ And first, they ought not knowingly or designedly to bring it upon themselves. This is 527>contrary both to the example and advice of our Lord and all his apostles, who teach us not only not to seek, but to avoid it as far as we can without injuring our conscience, without giving up any part of that righteousness which we are to prefer before life itself. So our Lord expressly saith, ‘When they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another’
Matt. 10:23.
1010. Yet think not that you can always avoid it, either by this or any other means. If ever that idle imagination steals into your heart, put it to flight by that earnest caution: ‘Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his Lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you.’
John 15:20.
Matt. 10:16.
Neither desire to avoid it, to escape it wholly; for if you do, you are none of his. If you escape the persecution you escape the blessing, the blessing of those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake.
Matt. 5:10.
Cf. 2 Tim. 2:12.
1111. Nay, rather, ‘rejoice and be exceeding glad’
Matt. 5:12.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Cf. 2 Cor. 4:17.
12
52812. Meantime, let no persecution turn you out of the way of
lowliness and meekness, of love and beneficence. ‘Ye have heard’ indeed ‘that it
hath been said, An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’
[Matt. 5,]
ver. 38, etc.
‘But I say unto you, that ye resist not evil’—not thus: not by returning it in kind. ‘But’ (rather than do this) ‘whosoever smiteth thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also. And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.’
Matt. 5:39-41.
So invincible let thy meekness be.
Cf. No. 22, ‘Sermon on the Mount, II’, I.4 and n.
Matt. 5:42.
Rom. 13:8.
See 1 Tim. 5:8.
Gal. 6:10. This paragraph is an anticipation of ‘give all you can…’; cf. No. 50, ‘The Use of Money’.
1313. The meekness and love we are to feel, the kindness we are to show to them which persecute us for righteousness’ sake, our blessed Lord describes farther in the following verses. O that they were graven upon our hearts!
‘Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate
thy enemy.’
Ver. 43, etc.
Lev. 19:18, etc.
1 John 3:10.
Matt. 5:43-44.
Matt. 5:44.
Cf. Matt. 5:11.
Matt. 5:44.
Rom. 12:21.
Matt. 5:44.
Luke 17:3-4.
Matt. 18:22.
Matt. 5:45.
[Matt. 5,] ver. 46.
Ver. 47.
Ver. 48.
IV. Behold Christianity in its native form, as delivered by its great Author! This is the genuine religion of Jesus Christ. Such he presents it to him whose eyes are opened. See a picture of God, so far as he is imitable by man! A picture drawn by God’s own hand! ‘Behold, ye despisers, and wonder and perish!’
Acts 13:41.
A composite of echoes from Acts 22:4; 5:39; 23:9; 9:6.
Cf. Jas. 1:22.
Cf. Jas. 1:23-24.
Cf. Jas. 1:25.
Cf. 1 Cor. 9:25.
Cf. 1 Pet. 1:15.
Cf. Matt. 5:48. Notice the positive reference to ‘religion’ here by contrast with No. 22, ‘Sermon on the Mount, II’, II.4.
How to Cite This Entry
Bibliography:
, “.” In , edited by . , 2024. Entry published February 25, 2024. https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon023.About this Entry
Entry Title: Sermon 23: Upon Our Lord’s Sermon On The Mount, Discourse III