Notes:
Sermon 26: Upon Our Lord’s Sermon On The Mount, Discourse VI
The unifying theme of these next thirteen ‘discourses’ on the Sermon on the Mount, with all their variations and nuancings, is the Christian life understood as the fruit of justifying faith. But given such faith, what follows? Wesley’s answer is given in this extended exposition of the Christian life based on the locus classicus of evangelical ethics, ‘The Sermon on the Mount’ (i.e., Matthew 5-7). Since Tyndale, this ‘sermon’ had been understood as ‘the epitome of God’s laws and promises’ for Christian believers; cf. Clebsch, England’s Earliest Protestants, p. 184; see also William Burkitt, Expository Notes…on the New Testament (eleven editions between 1700 and 1739), Preface to chapter 5: ‘Christ’s famous Sermon on the Mount comprehends the sum and substance of both the Old and New Testaments.’
Taken together, the following sermons are not a thirteen-part essay, tightly organized and argued. Instead, they are separate sermons, drawn from materials running back to 1725, arranged in a triadic pattern that seems to have been original with Wesley. Each is a discourse in its own right; yet the series is designed so that each appears as a part of a whole. This means that the sermons may be read singly or together, but with an eye on their shared aim: ‘to assert and prove every branch of gospel obedience as indispensably necessary to eternal salvation’; cf. Wesley’s open letter (Nov. 17, 1759) to John Downes in reply to the latter’s abusive Methodism Examined and Exposed (1759).
Many of the great and near-great commentators of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries had devoted their talents to the interpretation of Matthew 5-7 as the principal summary of Christian ethics, or, in Henry Hammond’s phrase, as ‘an abstract of Christian philosophy’; cf. his Practical Catechism (1st edn., c. 1644), II.1, in the Library of Anglo-Catholic Theology (1847), p. 83. Chief among these earlier works, in the order of their influences upon Wesley’s thought, were Bishop Offspring Blackall, ‘Eighty-Seven Practical Discourses Upon Our Saviour’s Sermon on the Mount’, Works, I.1-561; II.609-939; 467John Norris, Practical Discourses; the American, James Blair, Our Saviour’s Divine Sermon on the Mount in IV Volumes (1722; 2nd edn., 1740, with a preface by Daniel Waterland); John Cardinal Bona, Guide to Eternity… (six editions in English between 1672 and 1712); and Henry Hammond, op. cit. Echoes of all these are scattered along the way, together with lesser borrowings from Bengel, Poole, and Henry. This makes it all the more remarkable that Wesley came up with a model of his own, both inform and substance. This series thus reminds us, yet again, of Wesley’s ready appeal to tradition—even while he maintains his own originality and independence.
Benjamin Ingham records in his Journal that ‘during the voyage [to Georgia] Wesley went over our Saviour’s Sermon on the Mount’ with the ship’s company aboard the Simmonds. There are also other records of his preaching, very early on, from one or another text in Matthew 5-7. For example, his second sermon was preached at Binsey (near Oxford), November 21, 1725, on Matt. 6:33. A first draft of the sermon which appears here as ‘Discourse VIII’ seems to have been written out in 1736. Later, it was the example of the Sermon on the Mount that encouraged Wesley to break out of his High Church prejudices in Bristol, April 1, 1739: ‘In the evening (Mr. Whitefield being gone) I begun expounding our Lord’s Sermon on the Mount (one pretty remarkable precedent of field preaching, though I suppose there were churches at that time also) to a little society which was accustomed to meet once or twice a week in Nicholas Street;’ cf. Journal entries for this whole story of the unplanned outbreak of the Wesleyan Revival.
The records show that, between 1739 and 1746, Wesley preached more than one hundred sermons from separate texts in the Sermon on the Mount. There is, however, no recorded instance of his having treated that Sermon as a whole anywhere else. Evidently, he was prepared to allow this series, once published, to stand as his sufficient comment on the subject.
In his introduction to ‘Discourse X’, §§1-3, Wesley repeats his explanation (cf. ‘Discourse I’, Proem, §10) of how he had conceived the design of Matthew 5-7, according to its three unfolding themes: (1) ‘the sum of true religion’; (2) ‘rules touching that right intention which we are to preserve in all our outward actions’; and (3) ‘the main hindrances of this religion’. He then adds a clarifying summary: ‘In the fifth chapter [of St. Matthew] our great Teacher…has laid before us those dispositions of the soul which constitute real Christianity…. In the sixth [chapter] he has shown how all our actions…may be made holy, and good, and acceptable to God, by a pure and holy intention…. In 468the former part of [ch. 7] he points out the most common and fatal hindrances of this holiness; in the latter [part] he exhorts us, by various motives, to break through all [such hindrances] and secure that prize of our high calling [of God in Christ Jesus]’ (cf. Phil. 3:14).
The thirteen discourses are divided almost equally over the three chapters of St. Matthew: five for chapter five, four each for six and seven. Of the first five, Discourse I is devoted to the first two Beatitudes; Discourse II to Beatitudes three through five (with a hymn to love based on 1 Cor. 13); Discourse III to the remainder of the Beatitudes; Discourse IV turns to Christianity as ‘a social religion’ in which inward holiness (our love of God) prompts outward holiness (love of neighbour); Discourse V is a balancing of law and gospel. Discourses VI-IX are based on chapter six: VI to the problems of purity and holiness of intention (to the ‘works of piety and of mercy’); VII to fasting; VIII to a denunciation of greed and surplus accumulation; IX to the mutually exclusive services of God and Mammon. Discourses X-XIII turn to various hindrances to holy living and to their avoidance: X to ‘judging’ (contrary to love), ‘intemperate zeal’, ‘neglect of prayer’, ‘neglect of charity’; XI to the noxious influences of ill-example and ill-advice with which the world deludes us; XII to false prophets and unedifying preachers (and yet also our duties to attend church nonetheless and to avail ourselves of all means of grace); XIII is an inevitable comment on the parable of the houses built on sand and rock. Discourse XII was also published separately in the same year that it appeared in SOSO, III (1750), under the title, ‘A Caution Against False Prophets. A Sermon on Matt. vii. 15-20. Particularly recommended to the People Called Methodists’. This went through seven editions during Wesley’s lifetime. For a stemma delineating the publishing history of that sermon (‘collected’ and ‘separate’) and a list of variant readings, see Appendix, ‘Wesley’s Text’, Vol. IV, see also Bibliog, Nos. 130 and 13o.i.
Obviously there is no interest, in any of these sermons, in critical textual problems or in the historical context. Everywhere it is assumed that in St. Matthew’s text we are dealing with divine ipsissima verba—i.e., with a direct address from ὁ ὤν, ‘the self-existent, the Supreme, the God who is over all, blessed for ever’ (§9 below). The Sermon on the Mount, in Wesley’s view, is the only Gospel passage where Christ designed ‘to lay down at once the whole plan of his religion, to give us a full prospect of Christianity’. What matters most in our reading, therefore, is an awareness of Wesley’s sense of the wholeness of the message he is interpreting, of his conviction of the honest integration of an evangel profoundly ethical with an ethic that is also vividly 469evangelical. Maybe more than anywhere else in SOSO this particular bloc displays Wesley’s distinctive concern for integration and balance—between the faith that justifies and the faith that works by love.
572 Upon our Lord’s Sermon on the Mount,Discourse the Sixth
Matthew 6:1-15
Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them; otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven.
Therefore when thou dost thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have praise of men. Verily, I say unto you, they have their reward.
But when thou dost alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doth: that thine alms may be in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret, himself shall reward thee openly.
And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are; for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.
But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut the door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret, he shall reward thee openly.
But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do; for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.
Be not ye therefore like unto them; for your Father knoweth what things ye have need of before you ask him.
After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father, which art in heaven, hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive them that trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. For thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory, for ever and ever. Amen.
For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you.
But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.
11. In the preceding chapter our Lord has described inward religion in its various branches. He has laid before us those 573dispositions of soul which constitute real Christianity: the inward tempers contained in that holiness ‘without which no man shall see the Lord’
Heb. 12:14.
22. The necessity of this purity of intention
The central theme in the holy living tradition; cf. Kempis, II. vi. 3: ‘Man considereth the deeds, but God weigheth the intention.’ Cf. also Nos. 12, ‘The Witness of Our Own Spirit’, §11 and n.; 30, ‘Sermon on the Mount, X’, §§1-2; 104, ‘On Attending the Church Service’, §30; 105, ‘On Conscience’, I.3; 146, ‘The One Thing Needful’, III.3; 148, ‘A Single Intention’, I.4. See also An Address to the Clergy, I.3(1); and Wesley’s Notes on Matt. 6:1, 22.
See above, No. 14, The Repentance of Believers, I.13 and n.; see also, below, II.1.
1I. 1. And, first, with regard to works of mercy.
Ibid.
See Matt. 25:35-38.
5742. ‘Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them.’ The thing which is here forbidden is not barely the doing good in the sight of men. This circumstance alone, that others see what we do, makes the action neither worse nor better, but the doing it before men, ‘to be seen of them’—with this view, from this intention only. I say, ‘from this intention only’, for this may in some cases be a part of our intention; we may design that some of our actions should be seen, and yet they may be acceptable to God. We may intend that our ‘light’ should ‘shine before men’, when our conscience bears us witness in the Holy Ghost that our ultimate end in designing they should ‘see our good works’ is ‘that they may glorify our Father which is in heaven’.
Cf. Matt. 5:16.
A reflection of Wesley’s fear of vanity and ‘thirst for fame’; cf. No. 14, The Repentance of Believers, I.7 and n.
33. ‘Therefore when thou dost thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have praise of men.’ The word ‘synagogue’ does not here mean a place of worship, but any place of public resort, such as the market-place or exchange.
An unconventional opinion echoing an obscure controversy marked by the studies of Carolus Signorius (1524-84) and Campegius Vitringa (1659-1722). For the view here offered by Wesley, and the views of Hugo Grotius and the majority of the Christian and Jewish commentators of the period on the other side; viz., that synagogues were ‘pre-eminently places of worship’, see Encyclopedia Judaica, XV.587, 594. Wesley’s view would be urged again a century later by the eminent Hungarian rabbi, Leopold Löw, who believed that the synagogue (lit. ‘the place of meeting’) was designed as a public centre for many functions in the community: the study of Torah, liturgical worship, and social intercourse. For a contemporary discussion of this problem, cf. I. Sonne, ‘Synagogue’, in The Abingdon Dictionary of the Bible.
Cf. No. 4, Scriptural Christianity, I.6 and n.
44. ‘But when thou dost alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doth.’ This is a proverbial expression, the meaning of which is, do it in as secret a manner as is possible: as secret as is consistent with the doing it at all (for it must not be left undone: omit no opportunity of doing good, whether secretly or openly) and with the doing it in the most effectual manner. For here is also an exception to be made. When you are fully persuaded in your own mind that by your not concealing the good which is done either you will yourself be enabled, or others excited, to do the more good, then you may not conceal it: then let your light appear, and ‘shine to all that are in the house’.
Cf. Matt. 5:15.
1II. 1. From works of charity or mercy our Lord proceeds to those which are termed works of piety.
Cf. I.1, above, and No. 14, The Repentance of Believers, I.13 and n.
22. But it is not only the having an eye to the praise of men which cuts us off from any reward in heaven, which leaves us no room to expect the blessing of God upon our works, whether of piety or mercy; purity of intention is equally destroyed by a view to any temporal reward whatever. If we repeat our prayers, if we attend the public worship of God, if we relieve the poor, with a view to gain or interest, it is not a whit more acceptable to God than if it were done with a view to praise.
See 1 Cor. 13:2-3.
33. ‘But when thou prayest, enter into thy closet; and when thou hast shut the door, pray to thy Father which is in secret.’ There is a time when thou art openly to glorify God, to pray and praise him in the great congregation.
See Ps. 40:9, etc.
See Phil. 4:6.
See Ps. 55:17 (BCP).
44. ‘But when ye pray’, even in secret, ‘use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do.’ Μὴ βατταλογήσητε.
Cf. Blackall, Discourse XLVII, Works, I.479-82, on ‘Vain Repetitions’ or ‘Battology’; note the extent to which Blackall has already made the very same distinctions that Wesley repeats here. In III.1, below, he will recommend the Lord’s Prayer, however, as worthy of constant repetition.
577The thing here reproved is not simply the length, no more than the shortness of our prayers. But, first, length without meaning: the speaking much, and meaning little or nothing; the using (not all repetitions; for our Lord himself prayed thrice, repeating the same words; but) vain repetitions, as the heathens did, reciting the names of their gods over and over; as they do among Christians (vulgarly so called) and not among the Papists only, who say over and over the same string of prayers without ever feeling what they speak. Secondly, the thinking to be heard for our much speaking: the fancying God measures prayers by their length, and is best pleased with those which contain the most words, which sound the longest in his ears. These are such instances of superstition and folly as all who are named by the name of Christ should leave to the heathens, to them on whom the glorious light of the gospel hath never shined.
See 2 Cor. 4:4.
55. ‘Be not ye therefore like unto them.’ Ye who have tasted of the grace of God in Christ Jesus are throughly convinced ‘your Father knoweth what things ye have need of before ye ask him.’ So that the end of your praying is not to inform God, as though he knew not your wants already; but rather to inform yourselves, to fix the sense of those wants more deeply in your hearts, and the sense of your continual dependence on him who only is able to supply all your wants. It is not so much to move God—who is always more ready to give than you to ask—as to move yourselves, that you may be willing and ready to receive the good things he has prepared for you.
See 1 Cor. 2:9.
1III. 1. After having taught the true nature and ends of prayer our Lord
subjoins an example of it: even that divine form of prayer which seems in this
place to be proposed by way of pattern chiefly, as the model and standard of all
our prayers—‘After this manner therefore pray ye.’ Whereas elsewhere he enjoins
the use of these very words: ‘He said unto them, When ye pray, say….’
Luke
11:2.
22. We may observe in general concerning this divine prayer, first, that it contains all we can reasonably or innocently pray for. There is nothing which we have need to ask of God, nothing which we can ask without offending him, which is not included 578either directly or indirectly in this comprehensive form. Secondly, that it contains all we can reasonably or innocently desire; whatever is for the glory of God, whatever is needful or profitable, not only for ourselves, but for every creature in heaven and earth. And indeed our prayers are the proper test of our desires, nothing being fit to have a place in our desires which is not fit to have a place in our prayers; what we may not pray for, neither should we desire. Thirdly, that it contains all our duty to God and man; whatsoever things are pure and holy,
See Phil. 4:8.
See Ps. 19:14.
33. It consists of three parts: the preface, the petitions, and the doxology or conclusion.
Cf. Blackall, Works, I.502: ‘In [the Lord’s Prayer] there are three principal parts: the Preface, the Body of the Prayer and the Conclusion…. The conclusion contains a Doxology, or a solemn recognition of the power and majesty of God.’
44. ‘Our Father.’ If he is a Father, then he is good, then he is loving to his children. And here is the first and great reason for prayer. God is willing to bless; let us ask for a blessing. ‘Our Father’—our Creator, the Author of our being; he who raised us from the dust of the earth, who breathed into us the breath of life, and we became living souls.
See Gen. 2:7.
Cf. Heb. 4:16.
Rom. 3:24.
Cf. Ps. 51:9.
Cf. Ps. 103:3 (BCP).
BCP, Collects, Sunday after Christmas.
Cf. Gal. 4:6.
Cf. 1 Pet. 1:3, 23.
Cf. Eph. 2:10.
1 Thess. 5:17.
1 John 4:19.
55. ‘Our Father’—not mine only who now cry unto him; but ours, in the most extensive sense. The ‘God and Father of the spirits of all flesh’;
Cf. 2 Cor. 1:2, etc.; see also Num. 16:22; 27:16.
Cf. Homer, Iliad, i. 544 (‘father of men and gods’); see also Hesiod, Works and Days, l. 59.
See Acts 10:34 and 1 Pet. 1:17.
Ps. 145:9 (BCP).
Ps. 147:11 (BCP).
Eph. 1:6.
1 John 4:11.
John 3:16.
66. ‘Which art in heaven’—high and lifted up; God over all, blessed for ever.
See Rom. 9:5.
See Wisd. 13:2.
Wesley uses this phrase at least four times in the sermons, three times without quotation marks. See the versification of Ps. 46 [by Henry Pitt?] in John’s letter to his brother Samuel, Apr. 4, 1726, later printed in A Collection of Psalms and Hymns (1737), p. 4, and Hymns and Sacred Poems (1739), p. 135: ‘…the pathless realms…of uncreated night’. Cf. also AM, 1779, 157; and Milton, Paradise Lost, ii. 149-50. Cf. Nos. 118, ‘On the Omnipresence of God’, I.1; 120, ‘The Unity of the Divine Being’, §6; and 132, ‘On Faith, Heb. 11:1’, §7.
Cf. Acts 15:18 and Notes, loc. cit.
Ibid.
Rom. 11:33.
Rev. 19:16.
1 Tim. 6:15.
Ps. 65:6.
Cf. Phil. 2:13.
BCP, Communion, Sanctus.
Therefore should we ‘serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice unto him with reverence’.
Ps. 2:11 (BCP).
77. ‘Hallowed be thy name.’ This is the first of the six petitions whereof the prayer itself is composed.
Bengel, Gnomon, reckons seven petitions in the Prayer; Poole, Annotations, Henry, Exposition, and Blackall, list only six.
Cf. Rev. 1:8.
Cf. Eph. 3:19; Col. 2:9.
Exod. 3:14.
Cf. No. 15, The Great Assize, III.3.
See Exod. 8:19; Luke 11:20.
Gen. 1:1; note that all of Wesley’s Hebrew quotations are unpointed.
Heb. 1:3.
In praying that God, or his ‘name’, may ‘be hallowed’ or glorified, we pray that he may be known, such as he is, by all that are capable thereof, by all intelligent beings, and with affections suitable to that knowledge: that he may be duly honoured and feared and loved by all in heaven above and in the earth beneath;
Josh. 2:11. Cf. Blackall, Works, I.514-17, clearly a fruitful source for what Wesley has compressed here.
88. ‘Thy kingdom come.’ This has a close connection with the preceding petition. In order that the name of God may be hallowed, we pray that his kingdom, the kingdom of Christ, may come. This kingdom then comes to a particular person when he ‘repents and believes the gospel’;
Cf. Mark 1:15.
See 1 Cor. 2:2.
Cf. John 17:3.
See Rev. 19:6.
Phil. 3:21.
See Rev. 6:2.
Cf. 2 Cor. 10:5.
When therefore God shall ‘give his Son the heathen for his inheritance, and the utmost parts of the earth for his possession’;
Ps. 2:8 (BCP).
Ps. 72:11 (BCP).
Isa. 2:2.
Cf. Rom. 11:25-26.
Ps. 93:1 (BCP).
Rev. 19:16, etc.
2 Tim. 4:8.
Rom. 14:17.
For this also we pray in those words, ‘Thy kingdom come.’ We pray for the coming of his everlasting kingdom, the kingdom of glory in heaven, which is the continuation and perfection of the kingdom of grace on earth. Consequently this, as well as the preceding petition, is offered up for the whole intelligent creation, who are all interested in this grand event, the final renovation of all things by God’s putting an end to misery and sin, to infirmity and death, taking all things into his own hands, and setting up the kingdom which endureth throughout all ages.
Exactly answerable to this are those awful words in the prayer at the burial of the dead: ‘Beseeching thee, that it may please thee, of thy gracious goodness, shortly to accomplish the number of thine elect, and to hasten thy kingdom; that we, with all those that are departed in the true faith of thy holy name, may have our perfect consummation and bliss, both in body and soul, in thy everlasting glory.’
BCP, Burial (481); note how later Prayer Books have altered this; see also No. 25, ‘Sermon on the Mount, V’, IV.13 and n.
5839. ‘Thy will be done on earth,
Note Wesley’s punctuation of this phrase, thus accenting the petition that God’s will should ‘be done on earth’ as it is, of course, in heaven. For this, he has the authority of the AV and the 1662 BCP. Law’s Serious Call, (Works, IV.47), follows the AV and the BCP. Blackall, Works, I.532, follows the punctuation of the Bishops’ Bible: ‘thy will be done, [as well] in earth, as it is in heaven.’ But see John Norris, Practical Discourses, the last of which is entitled, ‘Concerning Doing God’s Will on Earth…’. Wesley may have had Norris’s description of ‘angelic obedience’ here in mind.
It is probable many, perhaps the generality of men, at the first view of these words are apt to imagine they are only an expression of, or petition for, resignation; for a readiness to suffer the will of God, whatsoever it be concerning us. And this is unquestionably a divine and excellent temper, a most precious gift of God. But this is not what we pray for in this petition, at least not in the chief and primary sense of it. We pray, not so much for a passive as for an active conformity to the will of God in saying, ‘Thy will be done on earth as it is done in heaven.’
How is it done by the angels of God in heaven? Those who now circle his throne rejoicing? They do it willingly; they love his commandments, and gladly hearken to his words. It is their meat and drink to do his will;
See John 4:34.
Rev. 4:8.
Cf. No. 54, ‘On Eternity’, §§5-8.
Job 25:5.
See Job 38:7.
If we view this in another light, we may observe the angels of God in heaven do all the will of God. And they do nothing else, 584>nothing but what they are absolutely assured is his will. Again, they do all the will of God as he willeth, in the manner which pleases him, and no other. Yea, and they do this only because it is his will; for this and no other reason.
1010. When therefore we pray that the ‘will of God’ may ‘be done on earth as it is in heaven’, the meaning is that all the inhabitants of the earth, even the whole race of mankind, may do the will of their Father which is in heaven as willingly as the holy angels; that these may do it continually, even as they, without any interruption of their willing service. Yea, and that they may do it perfectly; that ‘the God of peace, through the blood of the everlasting covenant, may make them perfect in every good work to do his will, and work in them all which is well-pleasing in his sight’.
Cf. Heb. 13:20-21.
In other words, we pray that we, and all mankind, may do the whole will of God in all things; and nothing else, not the least thing but what is the holy and acceptable will of God.
See Rom. 12:1, 2.
1111. ‘Give us this day our daily bread.’ In the three former petitions we have been praying for all mankind. We come now more particularly to desire a supply for our own wants. Not that we are directed, even here, to confine our prayer altogether to ourselves; but this and each of the following petitions may be used for the whole church of Christ upon earth.
By ‘bread’ we may understand all things needful, whether for our souls or bodies: τὰ πρὸς ζωὴν καὶ εὐσέβειαν,
2 Pet. 1:3.
John 6:27.
Wesley was well aware, with Blackall (Works, I.542), that ‘concerning the strict and proper meaning of this word, ἐπιούσιος, there is a great dispute among the critics.’ Origen, On Prayer, ch. 27, defines it as ‘supersubstantial’; Tertullian, On Prayer, §6, and Cyprian, On the Lord’s Prayer, §18, speak of panem quotidianum (‘daily bread’). Ambrose, On the Sacraments, 5.4.24 (Migne, PL, XVI.452A) is more emphatic than any of the other Latin Fathers that ἐπιούσια means ‘supernatural’ (supersubstantialis). Jerome reports that the now lost ‘Gospel according to the Hebrews’ had ἡ ἐπιουσία ἥμερα (‘sufficient for tomorrow’); cf. Gerhard Kittel, ed., Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (Grand Rapids, Mich., Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1964), II.591. Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lectures, XXIII.15, comes close to Wesley’s point, but Chrysostom interprets it more mundanely as ‘bread enough for one day’ (Homilies…on the Gospel of St. Matthew, XIX.8). In this he is supported by a fifth century papyrus in which ἐπιούσιος occurs with the sense of ‘daily ration’; cf. W. M. Flinders Petrie, Hawara, Biahmu, Arsinoë (London, Field and Tuer, 1889), pp. 33-35.
See Matt. 24:12.
‘Our daily bread.’ The word we render ‘daily’ has been differently explained by different commentators. But the most plain and natural sense of it seems to be this, which is retained in almost all translations, as well ancient as modern: what is sufficient for this day, and so for each day as it succeeds.
1212. ‘Give us;’ for we claim nothing of right, but only of free mercy. We deserve not the air we breathe, the earth that bears, or the sun that shines upon us. All our desert, we own, is hell.
Cf. ‘Hymns for a Protestant’ (1745, at end of A Word to a Protestant, Bibliog, No. 113, Vol. 14 of this edn.), Poet. Wks., VI.2, Hymn I, l. 40: ‘My whole desert is hell.’
Not that either the goodness or the power of God is a reason for us to stand idle. It is his will that we should use all diligence in all things, that we should employ our utmost endeavours, as much as if our success were the natural effect of our own wisdom and strength. And then, as though we had done nothing, we are to depend on him, the giver of every good and perfect gift.
Jas. 1:17.
‘This day;’ for we are to take no thought for the morrow.
See Matt. 6:34.
1313. ‘And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive them that trespass against us.’ As nothing but sin can hinder the bounty of God from flowing forth upon every creature, so this petition naturally follows the former; that all hindrances being removed, we may the more clearly trust in the God of love for every manner of thing which is good.
586‘Our trespasses.’ The word properly signifies ‘our debts’.
The only two instances of ὀφείλημα in the New Testament are here and in Rom. 4:4 (where, clearly, the single meaning is ‘debt’). Bengel, Gnomon, translated ‘our debts’ without further comment; Blackall had translated and interpreted it as ‘trespasses’; Poole (Annotations) and Henry (Exposition) had understood the phrase as ‘our debts’, but meaning ‘our sins’; cf. Wesley’s Notes. He could have joined Blackall’s concluding prayer on this point: ‘We humbly beseech thee to give us thy grace, that we may never forfeit our title to thy pardon upon our repentance, by denying pardon, by bearing hatred or malice, or a spirit of revenge to any who trespass against us’ (cf. Works, I.556).
Matt. 18:24, 28.
See Luke 15:13.
John 11:44.
Cf. Matt. 18:34.
Indeed we are already bound hand and foot by the chains of our own sins. These, considered with regard to ourselves, are chains of iron and fetters of brass. They are wounds wherewith the world, the flesh, and the devil, have gashed and mangled us all over. They are diseases that drink up our blood and spirits, that bring us down to the chambers of the grave.
Cf. Prov. 7:27.
Cf. Luke 7:42.
The word translated ‘forgive’ implies either to forgive a debt, or to unloose a chain. And if we attain the former, the latter follows of course: if our debts are forgiven, the chains fall off our hands. As soon as ever, through the free grace of God in Christ, we ‘receive forgiveness of sins’, we receive likewise ‘a lot among those which are sanctified, by faith which is in him’.
Cf. Acts 26:18.
Rom. 6:14, 15.
Cf. Rom. 8:1.
Cf. Rom. 8:4.
1414. ‘As we forgive them that trespass against us.’ In these words our Lord
clearly declares both on what condition and in what degree or manner we may look
to be forgiven of God. All our trespasses and sins are forgiven us if we forgive, and as we forgive,
others. First, God forgives us if we forgive others. This
is a point of the utmost importance. And our blessed Lord is so jealous lest at
any time we should let it slip out of our thoughts that he not only inserts it
in the body of his prayer, but presently after repeats it twice over: ‘If, saith
he, ‘ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive
you. But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father
forgive your trespasses.’
[Matt. 6:] 14-15.
See Jer. 18:23.
In the meantime, while we do not from our hearts forgive our neighbour his trespasses, what manner of prayer are we offering to God whenever we utter these words? We are indeed setting God at open defiance: we are daring him to do his worst. ‘Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive them that trespass against us!’ That is, in plain terms, ‘Do not thou forgive us at all; we desire no favour at thy hands. We pray that thou wilt keep our sins in remembrance, and that thy wrath may abide upon us.’ But can you seriously offer such a prayer to God? And hath he not yet cast you quick into hell?
Ps. 55:15 (AV).
1515. ‘And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.’ ‘Lead us not into temptation.’ The word translated ‘temptation’ means trial of any kind.
Cf. Blackall, Works, II.609: ‘The word “temptation” signifies nothing else but only a trial or experiment made of any person to see of what temper and disposition he is.’
An echo of Johnson’s definition: ‘a solicitation to ill’.
[Jas.] 1:12.
Cf. Jas. 1:13-14. See also No. 19, ‘The Great Privilege of those that are Born of God’, III.1.
Cf. Jas. 1:13.
Matt. 6:13.
1 John 2:13, 14; 3:12; 5:18. Cf. No. 12, ‘The Witness of Our Own Spirit’, §10 and n.
See John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11.
Eph. 2:2.
Cf. Luke 18:7.
Cf. 1 John 5:18.
1616. The conclusion of this divine prayer,
Note that Wesley adds the doxology here, as in the AV and in Tyndale, Cranmer, and Geneva, but not in the TR, nor in Wycliffe or Douai. Blackall, Works, II.616-26, takes the doxology for granted, as had the BCP and Anglicans generally. It is, of course, lacking from the earliest MSS of St. Matthew; Origen (On Prayer, ch. 30, §3) seems unaware of any such addition. In the Latin Mass, the Paternoster ends with Libera nos a male, with the succeeding collect picking up the phrase and repeating it. One may, therefore, wonder if Wesley knew the actual text of the Roman Mass.
See Dan. 4:3.
Matt. 6:13. See No. 145, ‘In Earth as in Heaven’ (a fragment) on Matt. 6:10 (1734).
I believe it will not be unacceptable to the serious reader, to subjoin
A
Paraphrase
on the
Lord’s Prayer
Hymns and Sacred Poems (1742), pp. 275-77, there entitled, ‘The Lord’s Prayer Paraphrased’.
How to Cite This Entry
Bibliography:
, “.” In , edited by . , 2024. Entry published February 25, 2024. https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon026.About this Entry
Entry Title: Sermon 26: Upon Our Lord’s Sermon On The Mount, Discourse VI