Notes:
Sermon 49: The Cure of Evil-Speaking
An Introductory Comment
If, as we saw in ‘Self-denial’, pietists are all too easily tempted to a sort of religious narcissism, so also they find it hard to resist their strong temptations to high-minded censoriousness. Wesley saw the dangers here and roundly asserts (more hopefully, perhaps, than realistically) that ‘a distinguishing mark of a Methodist [is that] he censures no man behind his back.’ The magnitude of this problem within the closeknit fellowship of Methodist class meetings, etc., is reflected in a formal compact that was drawn up by the brothers Wesley, in John’s own handwriting, and eleven of their colleagues, including Edward and Charles Perronet, on January 29, 1752:
“It is agreed by us whose names are underwritten:” “1. That we will not listen, or willingly inquire after any ill concerning each other.” “2. That if we do hear any ill of each other, we will not be forward to believe it.” “3. That as soon as possible we will communicate what we hear, by speaking or writing to the person concerned.” “4. That till we have done this we will not write or speak a syllable of it to any other person whatsoever.” “5. That neither will we mention it after we have done this to any other person.” “6. That we will not make any exception to any of these rules, unless we think ourselves absolutely obliged in conscience so to do.See Letters, 26:490 in this edn.
This concern is confirmed by the fact that Wesley preached against ‘evil-speaking’ at least nine times in that year, then twice in 1753, and once again in 1758. The effectiveness of these various efforts, and of this written sermon summing up the issue, may be gauged from the fact that we hear no more of it until an oral sermon in 1786, and another written sermon—on how to reprove a neighbour to his face—in 1787 (No. 65, The Duty of Reproving our Neighbour).
In light of Wesley’s definition of evil-speaking (‘neither more nor less than speaking evil of an absent person’) it is worth noting that he does not use the terms ‘gossip’, on the one hand, or ‘candour’, on the other. This reminds us that, in the eighteenth century, neither term meant to 02:252 Wesley what they later came to mean, by cynical extension in the case of ‘gossip’ and by inference in the case of ‘candour’ (cf. OED and Johnson’s Dictionary).
This ‘tract for the times’ has no other publishing history than its place as a sort of addendum in SOSO, IV.
The Cure of Evil-SpeakingMatthew 18:15-17
If thy brother shall sin against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he will hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother.
But if he will not hear, take with thee one or two more, that by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.
And if he will not hear them, tell it to the church: but if he will not hear the church, let him be to thee as an heathen man and a publican.
11. ‘Speak evil of no man,’
Titus 3:2.
Matt. 19:18.
The original μηδένα βλασφημεῖν is a prohibition against seditious language (cf. βλασφημέω in Liddell and Scott, Greek-English Lexicon, as well as Bauer’s commentary in Arndt and Gingrich, Greek-English Lexicon), but without reference to the presence or absence of the person blasphemed. This point is ignored in the standard commentaries; it is not even made in the Notes on this text. But see No. 14, The Repentance of Believers, I.11 and n.
Cf. both Johnson’s Dictionary and OED; they agree with Wesley’s stress on malice toward absent persons.
Cf. Shakespeare, King John, IV.ii.188-89: ‘When they talk of him, they shake their heads / And whisper one another in the ear.’
22. And how extremely common is this sin among all orders and degrees of men! How do high and low, rich and poor, wise and foolish, learned and unlearned, run into it continually! Persons who differ from each other in all things else, nevertheless agree in this. How few are there that can testify before God, ‘I am clear in this matter I have always set a watch before my mouth, and kept the door of my lips!’
Cf. Ps. 141:3.
Rom. 3:18.
See Acts 24:16.
33. And the very commonness of this sin makes it difficult to be avoided. As we are encompassed with it on every side, so if we are not deeply sensible of the danger, and continually guarding against it, we are liable to be carried away by the torrent. In this instance almost the whole of mankind is, as it were, in a conspiracy against us. And their example steals upon us we know not how, so that we insensibly slide into the imitation of it. Besides, it is recommended from within as well as from without. There is scarce any wrong temper in the mind of man which may not be occasionally gratified by it, and consequently incline us to it. It gratifies our pride to relate those faults of others whereof we think ourselves not to be guilty. Anger, resentment, and all unkind tempers are indulged by speaking against those with whom we are displeased. And in many cases, by reciting the sins of their neighbours, men indulge their own ‘foolish and hurtful desires’.
1 Tim. 6:9 (Notes).
44. Evil-speaking is the more difficult to be avoided because it frequently attacks us in disguise. We speak thus out of a noble, 02:254generous (’tis well if we do not say, ‘holy’) ‘indignation’ against these vile creatures! We commit sin from mere hatred of sin! We serve the devil out of pure zeal for God! It is merely in order to punish the wicked that we run into this wickedness. So do ‘the passions’ (as one speaks) ‘all justify themselves’,
Cf. Francis Hutcheson, ‘Concerning Moral Good and Evil’, in An Inquiry Into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue (1726), Treatise II, Sec. II, viii. 152. Cf. also No. 92, ‘On Zeal’, §2. For other references to Hutcheson, cf. No. 12, ‘The Witness of Our Own Spirit’, §5 and n. See also Thomas Browne, Religio Medici (1642), I.19: ‘…as reason is a rebel unto faith, so passion unto reason;’ and Pope’s Essay on Man, ii.42: ‘What reason weaves by passion is undone.’
55. But is there no way to avoid the snare? Unquestionably there is. Our blessed Lord has marked out a plain way for his followers in the words above recited. None who warily and steadily walks in this path will ever fall into evil-speaking. This rule is either an infallible preventive or a certain cure of it. In the preceding verses our Lord had said, ‘Woe to the world because of offences!’
Matt. 18:7.
Ibid.
Cf. Matt. 18:7-9.
1I. 1. First, ‘if thy brother shall sin against thee, go and tell him of his fault, between thee and him alone.’ The most literal way of 02:255following this first rule, where it is practicable, is the best. Therefore, if thou seest with thine own eyes a brother, a fellow-Christian, commit undeniable sin, or hearest it with thine own ears, so that it is impossible for thee to doubt the fact, then thy part is plain: take the very first opportunity of going to him; and if thou canst have access, ‘tell him of his fault between thee and him alone.’ Indeed great care is to be taken that this is done in a right spirit, and in a right manner. The success of a reproof greatly depends on the spirit wherein it is given.
Cf. No. 65, ‘The Duly of Reproving our Neighbour’.
Jas. 1:20.
Cf. Gal. 6:1.
Cf. 2 Tim. 2:25.
S. of S. 8:7.
Charles Wesley, ‘Against Hope, Believing in Hope’, in John and Charles Wesley, Hymns and Sacred Poems (1740), p. 157 (Poet. Wks. I.329).
Confirm then your love toward him, and you will thereby ‘heap coals of fire upon his head’.
Cf. Prov. 25:22; Rom. 12:20.
22. But see that the manner also wherein you speak be according to the gospel of Christ. Avoid everything in look, gesture, word, and tone of voice that savours of pride or self-sufficiency. Studiously avoid everything magisterial or dogmatical; everything that looks like arrogance or assuming. Beware of the most distant approach to disdain, overbearing, or contempt. With equal care 02:256avoid all appearance of anger, and though you use great plainness of speech, yet let there be no reproach, no railing accusation, no token of any warmth but that of love. Above all, let there be no shadow of hate or ill will, no bitterness or sourness of expression; but use the air and language of sweetness, as well as gentleness, that all may appear to flow from love in the heart. And yet this sweetness need not hinder your speaking in the most serious and solemn manner, as far as may be in the very words of the oracles of God (for there are none like them), and as under the eye of him who is coming to judge the quick and [the] dead.
2 Tim. 4:1; 1 Pet. 4:5. See also ‘The Apostles’ Creed’ and ‘The Creed Commonly Called Nicene’ (BCP).
33. If you have not an opportunity of speaking to him in person, or cannot have access, you may do it by a messenger, by a common friend in whose prudence as well as uprightness you can throughly confide. Such a person, speaking in your name, and in the spirit and manner above described, may answer the same end, and in a good degree supply your lack of service. Only beware you do not feign want of opportunity in order to shun the cross; neither take it for granted that you cannot have access without ever making the trial. Whenever you can speak in your own person it is far better. But you should rather do it by another than not at all: this way is better than none.
44. But what if you can neither speak yourself, nor find such a messenger as you can confide in? If this is really the case, it then only remains to write. And there may be some circumstances which make this the most advisable way of speaking. One of these circumstances is when the person with whom we have to do is of so warm and impetuous a temper as does not easily bear reproof, especially from an equal or inferior. But it may be so introduced and softened in writing as to make it far more tolerable. Besides, many will read the very same words which they could not bear to hear. It does not give so violent a shock to their pride, nor so sensibly touch their honour. And suppose it makes little impression at first, they will perhaps give it a second reading, and upon farther consideration lay to heart what before they disregarded. If you add your name, this is nearly the same thing as going to him and speaking in person. And this should always be done, unless it be rendered improper by some very particular reason.
502:2575. It should be well observed, not only that this is a step which our Lord absolutely commands us to take, but that he commands us to take this step first, before we attempt any other. No alternative is allowed, no choice of anything else; this is the way; walk thou in it.
See Isa. 30:21.
66. Do not think to excuse yourself for taking an entirely different step by saying, ‘Why, I did not speak to anyone till I was so burdened that I could not refrain.’ You was burdened! It was no wonder you should, unless your conscience was seared;
See 1 Tim. 4:2. Cf. No. 12, ‘The Witness of Our Own Spirit’, §19 and n.
Cf. Zech. 7:10.
77. I know but of one exception to this rule. There may be a peculiar case wherein it is necessary to accuse the guilty, though absent, in order to preserve the innocent. For instance: you are acquainted with the design which a man has against the property or life of his neighbour. Now the case may be so circumstanced that there is no other way of hindering that design from taking effect but the making it known without delay to him against whom it is laid. In this case therefore this rule is set aside, as is that of the Apostle, ‘Speak evil of no man,’
Titus 3:2.
1II. 1. But what ‘if he will not hear’? If he repay evil for good? If he be enraged rather than convinced? What if he hear to no purpose, and go on still in the evil of his way? We must expect this will frequently be the case; the mildest and tenderest reproof will have no effect, but the blessing we wished for another will return into our own bosom.
See Ps. 35:13.
1 Pet. 5:5.
Cf. 1 Pet. 3:9.
22. Love will dictate the manner wherein they should proceed, according to the nature of the case. Nor can any one particular manner be prescribed for all cases. But perhaps in general one might advise, before they enter upon the thing itself, let them mildly and affectionately declare that they have no anger or prejudice toward him, and that it is merely from a principle of goodwill that they now come, or at all concern themselves with his affairs. To make this the more apparent, they might then calmly attend to your repetition of your former conversation with him, and to what he said in his own defence, before they attempted to 02:259determine anything. After this they would be better able to judge in what manner to proceed, ‘that by the mouth of two or three witnesses, every word might be established’; that whatever you have said may have its full force by the additional weight of their authority.
33. In order to this, may they not, (1). Briefly repeat what you spoke, and what he answered? (2). Enlarge upon, open, and confirm the reasons which you had given? (3). Give weight to your reproof, showing how just, how kind, and how seasonable it was? And, lastly, enforce the advices and persuasions which you had annexed to it? And these may likewise hereafter, if need should require, bear witness of what was spoken.
44. With regard to this, as well as the preceding rule, we may observe that our Lord gives us no choice, leaves us no alternative, but expressly commands us to do this, and nothing else in the place of it He likewise directs us when to do this. Neither sooner, nor later: namely, after we have taken the first, and before we have taken the third step. It is then only that we are authorized to relate the evil another has done to those whom we desire to bear a part with us in this great instance of brotherly love. But let us have a care how we relate it to any other person till both these steps have been taken. If we neglect to take these, or if we take any others, what wonder if we are burdened still! For we are sinners against God and against our neighbour. And how fairly soever we may colour it, yet if we have any conscience our sin will find us out, and bring a burden upon our soul.
31III. 1. That we may be throughly instructed in this weighty affair our Lord has given us a still farther direction. ‘If he will not hear them’—then and not till then—‘tell it to the church.’ This is the third step. All the question is how this word, ‘the church’, is here to be understood. But the very nature of the thing will determine this beyond all reasonable doubt. You cannot tell it to the national church, the whole body of men termed ‘the Church of England’.
Note this unselfconscious assumption that ‘church’, in its broader denotation, is the Church of England. For Wesley’s understanding of himself as Anglican, see Vol. 1, Intro., p. 88.
I.e., the United Society of Methodists, here understood as an ecclesiola, most of whose members were registered on one or another parish roll in the Church of England.
Heb. 13:17.
Titus 2:15.
See Ezek. 33:4-6.
22. Here also let it be observed that this, and no other, is the third step which we are to take; and that we are to take it in its order, after the other two; not before the second, much less the first, unless in some very particular circumstance. Indeed in one case the second step may coincide with this: they may be, in a manner, one and the same. The elder or elders of the church may be so connected with the offending brother that they may set aside the necessity, and supply the place of the ‘one or two’ witnesses. So that it may suffice to tell it to them after you have told it to your brother, ‘between you and him alone’.
33. When you have done this you have delivered your own soul.
See Ezek. 14:14, 20; 33:9. Cf. above, No. 36, ‘The Law Established through Faith, ΙI’, I.5 and n.
402:2614. But if this be the rule by which Christians walk, which is the land where the Christians live?
See No. 4, Scriptural Christianity, IV.1 and n.
Cf. Ps. 94:16 (BCP). ‘
1 Kgs. 13:14.
Cf. Ps. 141:3.
Cf. Titus 3:2.
See Ps. 58:5 (BCP).
See 2 Sam. 2:23; 3:27.
Cf. Isa. 13:8; Rev. 12:2, etc.
55. O that all you who bear the reproach of Christ,
Heb. 11:26.
Titus 3:2.
Cf. Matt. 7:16, 20.
Cf. Isa. 48:18.
Cf. Heb. 12:14.
Cf. 1 Cor. 12:26.
1 Pet. 1:22.
See No. 22, ‘Sermon on the Mount, II’, III.18 and n.
Cf. John 17:20-21.
Cf. 1 John 3:18.
How to Cite This Entry
Bibliography:
, “.” In , edited by . , 2024. Entry published February 28, 2024. https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon049.About this Entry
Entry Title: Sermon 49: The Cure of Evil-Speaking