Notes:
Sermon 52: The Reformation of Manners
One of the prime concerns of the religious societies introduced into Restoration England by Dr. Anthony Horneck and others had been ‘the reformation of manners’—the reinforcement of police control of public vice, drunkenness, prostitution, etc., with assistance from concerned citizens, together with active aid programmes in relief of the ill, the destitute, and the unemployed (rf. Josiah Woodward, An Account of the Societies for the Reformation of Manners, in London, Westminster, and other parts of the Kingdom…against prophaneness and debauchery, for the effecting a National Reformation… [1699]). This project was underwritten by a network of neighbourhood ‘societies’, first organized in 1677 and then reorganized in 1691. The programmes of their annual meetings regularly included special sermons by eminent ministers; cf. the one hundred and twenty-eight sermons by William Wake, Isaac Watts, John Tillotson, Samuel Chandler, Joseph Burroughs, and others, listed in Early Nonconformity, 1566-1800: A Catalogue of Books in Dr. Williams’ Library, London (Boston, Mass., G. K. Hall and Co., 1968). And, on February 13, 1698, the sermon had been preached (in the morning at St. James’s, Westminster, and in the afternoon in St. Bride’s, London) by the rector of Epworth parish, Lincolnshire, the Revd. Samuel Wesley, Sen. It was later published in The Methodist Magazine (1814), pp. 648-65, 727-36, and should be compared with this present sermon, sixty-eight years later, for their notable similarity.
This movement of social reform seems to have ceased functioning by 1730 but was then revived in 1757 under the leadership of one ‘W. Welsh’ (see JWJ, February 2, 1766), and in 1763 John Wesley was invited to preach the ‘Annual Sermon’. This took place on January 30, not at one of the fashionable city churches, but in Wesley’s own ‘Chapel in West Street, Seven Dials’, for a society whose one hundred and sixty members numbered seventy Dissenters and only twenty ‘regular’ Anglicans.
This is another of Wesley’s sermons ad aulam (‘formal), in a ‘plain’ but ‘polite’ style—and, it might be noted, on the same text as his father 02:301had used before him. In its substance it is one of the least evangelical of any of Wesley’s sermons after 1738; its definition of ‘the church’ in §2 sounds more ‘congregational’ than ‘connexional’; its conclusions are moralistic and hortatory. Its descriptions of public vice and crime in mid-century London are confirmed, in part at least, by contemporary observers (e.g., Boswell, Hogarth, et al.) and by George Rudé, Hanoverian London, 1714-1808, ch. 5, and Dorothy George, London Life in the Eighteenth Century.
It was printed as a fairly expensive pamphlet (‘sixpence’) in 1763, and was then inserted into the Works (1771), Vol. IV; its third edition in Wesley’s lifetime is dated 1778. For its publishing history and variant readings, see Appendix, Vol. 4 in this edn.; and Bibliog, No. 254.
The Reformation of MannersPsalm 94:16
Who will rise up with me against the wicked?
BCP, Psalter.
1. In all ages men who neither feared God nor regarded man
See Luke 18:2.
Rom. 13:12; Eph. 5:11.
See Luke 16:18, which is also the text for No. 147, ‘Wiser than the Children of Light’ (one of the early MS sermons).
See John 8:44.
See Eph. 4:4.
1 John 3:8.
2. This is the original design of the church of Christ. It is a body of men compacted together in order, first, to save each his own soul, then to assist each other in working out their salvation, and afterwards, as far as in them lies, to save all men from present and future misery, to overturn the kingdom of Satan, and set up the kingdom of Christ.
Cf. this definition of ‘the church’ with those in No. 74, ‘Of the Church’; also No. 92, ‘On Zeal’, II.5; Popery Calmly Considered, I.6; Α Collection of Forms of Prayer (Bibliog, No. 1; Vol. 8 of this edn.); his letter to Gilbert Joyce, May 22, 1750; his Notes on Matt. 16:18, and on Eph. 3:10 (where the church is defined as ‘the theatre of divine wisdom’).
3. Accordingly this ought to be the constant care and endeavour of all those who are united together in these kingdoms, and are commonly called ‘the Church of England’. They are united together for this very end, to oppose the devil and all his works, and to wage war against the world and the flesh, his constant and faithful allies. But do they in fact answer the end of their union? Are all who style themselves ‘members of the Church of England’ heartily engaged in opposing the works of the devil and fighting against the world and the flesh? Alas, we cannot say this. So far from it that a great part—I fear, the greater part of them—are themselves ‘the world’, the people that know not God to any saving purpose; are indulging day by day instead of ‘mortifying the flesh, with its affections and desires’;
Cf. Rom. 8:13; Gal. 5:24 (Notes).
1 John 3:8.
4. There is therefore still need, even in this ‘Christian country’ (as we courteously style Great Britain)
Cf. this sarcastic touch with the suggestion in No. 65, ‘The Duty of Reproving our Neighbour’, §8, that ‘a little well-placed raillery will pierce deeper than solid argument, [especially] when we have to do with those who are strangers to religion.’
Ps. 94:16 (BCP).
Cf. Mal. 3:16.
Cf. Isa. 59:19.
Cf. Pss. 18:3 (BCP), and 18:4 (AV); see also 2 Sam. 22:5.
5. For this end a few persons in London, towards the close of the last century, united together, and after a while were termed ‘The Society for Reformation of Manners’.
Not one but many, cf. Josiah Woodward, Account of the…Societies…. Queen Mary’s Letter of Approval is dated July 9, 1691; King William’s Charge to the Societies was dated Feb. 24, 1697. The original society was composed of ‘Members of Parliament, Justices of the Peace, and considerable citizens of London’ (p. 10). There was ‘a second society of tradesmen and others’ (p. 11), and ‘a third society of constables…’ (pp. 11-12). ‘A fourth…is of supporters of the magistrates’ (pp. 12-13). ‘There are eight other related and mixed bodies of housekeepers and officers in the several quarters of London, Westminster, and Southwark.’ (pp. 14-15). ‘Nine and thirty religious societies in London, Westminster, and other parts of the nation’ (p. 15). Cf. Robert South’s comment about the religious societies in Sermons Preached Upon Several Occasions (1st edn., 1737; Philadelphia, Sorin and Ball, 1844), II.105: ‘Their leverage of influence is the sense of shame that decent people have in the face of the disapproval of polite society.’
6. It is a society of the same nature which has been lately formed. I purpose to show, first, the nature of their design, and the steps they have hitherto taken; (2), the excellency of it, with the various objections which have been raised against it; (3), what manner of men they ought to be who engage in such a design; and (4), with what spirit and in what manner they should proceed in the prosecution of it. I shall conclude with an application both to them and to all that fear God.
I. 1. I am, first, to show the nature of their design, and the steps they have hitherto taken.
It was on a Lord’s Day in August 1757 that in a small company who were met for prayer and religious conversation mention was made of the gross and open profanation of that sacred day, by 02:304persons buying and selling, keeping open shop, tippling in alehouses, and standing or sitting in the streets, roads, or fields, vending their wares as on common days; especially in Moorfields,
A large open moor north of the walled city, split by the new ‘City Road’ which led out from the Moorgate (opened in 1415). It was divided into ‘Moorfields’, ‘Middle Moorfields’ (later ‘Finsbury Pavement’), and ‘Upper Moorfields’. In Upper Moorfields there were the Royal Artillery grounds, Bunhill Fields, the Quaker Burying Ground, and, after 1739, Wesley’s London headquarters (in the Foundery). It was a favourite resort for the London poor and ‘middling sort’, and thus a happy hunting ground for mountebanks and petty criminals. It was also the site of many of the great outdoor preaching services held by the Wesleys and Whitefield.
The blind half-brother and successor to Henry Fielding (author of Tom Jones) as the chief magistrate at the Bow Street Courts. A man of ‘turbulent disposition’, he was zealous in his war on crime and criminals and interested in various philanthropic causes. William Cole said of him, in The Cambridge Chronicle, June 7, 1766, that ‘though stark blind and of no great reputation for strict integrity, he was generally esteemed as a very useful member of society.’
2. They first delivered petitions to the right honourable the Lord Mayor and the Court of Aldermen, to the Justices sitting at Hicks’s Hall,
Sir Baptist Hickes, first Viscount of Campden and first ‘shopkeeper’ ennobled by James I, ‘had built at his own cost a sessions-house for the Middlesex magistrates in St. John’s Street, Clerkenwell. It was known as Hick’s Hall and was in use as a low court from 1612 to 1788’ (see DNB), and served the boroughs of Holborn, St. Pancras, and Moorfields.
A part of the Palace of Westminster, built by William Rufus and altered by Richard II. It has been used for many purposes and is now incorporated into the New Palace (or Houses of Parliament). In Wesley’s time it was in use as ‘a low court’ (e.g., Common Pleas and the King’s Bench) and also as a sort of shopping centre.
3. It was next judged proper to signify their design to many persons of eminent rank, and to the body of the clergy, as well as the ministers of other denominations, belonging to the several churches and meetings in and about the cities of London and Westminster. And they had the satisfaction to meet with a hearty consent and universal approbation from them.
4. They then printed and dispersed, at their own expense, several thousand books of instruction to constables and other 02:305parish officers, explaining and enforcing their several duties. And to prevent as far as possible the necessity of proceeding to an actual execution of the laws, they likewise printed and dispersed in all parts of the town dissuasives from sabbath-breaking, extracts from Acts of Parliament against it, and notices to the offenders.
5. The way being paved by these precautions, it was in the beginning of the year 1758 that, after notices delivered again and again, which were as often set at naught, actual informations were made to magistrates against persons profaning the Lord’s day. By this means they first cleared the streets and fields of those notorious offenders who, without any regard either to God or the king, were selling their wares from morning to night. They proceeded to a more difficult attempt, the preventing tippling
Cf. Johnson, Dictionary: ‘To waste life over the cup.’ See also, Shakespeare, Anthony and Cleopatra, I.iv.16, 18-20:
I.e., the London mob; from Ps. 68:30 (BCP). Cf. also, No. 107, ‘On God’s Vineyard’, IV.2; JWJ, June 5, 1765; Free Thoughts on Public Affairs (Bibliog, No. 325; Vol. 15 of this edn.); Thoughts Upon Liberty, §23 (Bibliog, No. 337; Vol. 15 of this edn.). For Wesley’s frequent references to ‘the great vulgar’, cf. No. 31, ‘Sermon on the Mount, XI’, I.6 and n.
I.e., ‘gutters’. Cf. Johnson’s definition (‘the water-course of a street’) and his example from Arbuthnot (‘He came in so dirty as if he had been dragged through the kennel’). Cf. also JWJ, June 16, 1763.
6. Having therefore received help from God, they went on to restrain bakers likewise from spending so great a part of the Lord’s day in exercising the work of their calling.
The first two edns. added here the footnote: ‘They did not mean by this the restraining them from baking provision for the poor.’ This was omitted from the edn. in Wesley’s Works (1771), IV.90.
Cf. No. 25, ‘Sermon on the Mount, V’, IV.2 and n.
Alexander Mather, later Wesley’s trusted assistant, tells how in 1753 he was employed by William Marriott, master baker in the Moorfields area, but served notice that he would leave because of an uneasy conscience about the universal practice of ‘the baking of pans’ on Sundays. Marriott and a neighbouring baker canvassed all the master bakers in the area to secure a general agreement to give up the practice, but to no avail. He then told his own customers that he himself would bake no more on Sundays. And yet his business flourished the more, and he became one of the mainstays of Wesley’s Foundery society. See AM (1780), IIΙ.96-98.
7. In clearing the streets, fields, and alehouses of sabbath-breakers, they fell upon another sort of offenders as mischievous to society as any, namely, gamesters of various kinds. Some of these were of the lowest and vilest class, commonly called ‘gamblers’,
The noun ‘gambler’ was a slang word of recent coinage, thus defined in Johnson’s Dictionary: ‘Gambler (a cant word, I suppose, for game or gamester), a knave whose practice it is to invite the unwary to game and cheat them.’
See 2 Thess. 2:7.
8. Increasing in number and strength, they extended their views, and began not only to repress profane swearing, but to remove out of our streets another public nuisance and scandal of the Christian name—common prostitutes. Many of these were stopped in their mid-career of audacious wickedness. And in order to go to the root of the disease, many of the houses that 02:307entertained them have been detected, prosecuted according to law, and totally suppressed. And some of the poor, desolate women themselves, though fallen to
Apparently, a conflation of a line from Prior’s ‘Henry and Emma’ (line 498) and one from Samuel Wesley, Jun., ‘The Prisons Opened’ (Poems, 1736, p. 180), l. 110. Prior: ‘O line extreme of human infamy’; Wesley: ‘O lowest depth of human misery’. But see also John Van Brugh, ‘the lowest ebb of human infamy’ (The Provoked Wife [1697], Act III). Cf. also No. 115, ‘Dives and Lazarus’, I.2, where Wesley uses the same line as here, applied there to beggars.
have acknowledged the gracious providence of God, and broke off their sins by lasting repentance. Several of these have been placed out, and several received into the Magdalen Hospital.
A home for reformed ex-prostitutes, founded in 1758 by Jonas Hanway and Robert Dingley. Its first location was in Goodman’s Fields. Dr. William Dodd preached the inaugural sermon and acted as its chaplain.
9. If a little digression may be allowed, who can sufficiently admire the wisdom of divine providence in the disposal of the times and seasons so as to suit one occurrence to another? For instance. Just at a time when many of these poor creatures, being stopped in their course of sin, found a desire of leading a better life, as it were in answer to that sad question, ‘But if I quit the way I now am in, what can I do to live? For I am not mistress of any trade; and I have no friends that will receive me:’ I say, just at this time, God has prepared the Magdalen Hospital. Here those who have no trade, nor any friends to receive them, are received with all tenderness. Here they may live, and that with comfort, being provided with all things that are needful ‘for life and godliness’.
Cf. 2 Pet. 1:3.
10. But to return. The number of persons brought to justice
From August 1757 to August 1762, is 9,596
From thence to the present time,
For unlawful gaming, and profane swearing, 40
or sabbath-breaking, 400
Lewd women, and keepers of ill houses, 550
For offering to sale obscene prints, 2
In all, 10,588
11. In the admission of members into the society no regard is had to any particular sect or party. Whoever is found upon inquiry to be a good man is readily admitted. And none who has selfish or pecuniary views will long continue therein; not only because he 02:308can gain nothing thereby, but because he would quickly be a loser, inasmuch as he must commence subscriber as soon as he is a member. Indeed the vulgar cry is ‘These are all Whitfelites.’
A clue to the popular pronunciation of ‘Whitefield’.
II. 1. These are the steps which have been hitherto taken in prosecution of this design. I am, in the second place, to show the excellency thereof, notwithstanding the objections which have been raised against it. Now this may appear from several considerations. And, first, from hence—that the making an open stand against all the ungodliness and unrighteousness which overspread our land as a flood is one of the noblest ways of confessing Christ in the face of his enemies. It is giving glory to God, and showing mankind that even in these dregs of time,
‘Dregs of time’. A variation of Dryden’s familiar phrase, ‘dregs of life’ (in Aureng-Zebe, IV.1)? But see also Samuel Wesley, Sen., who cites only ‘the father of old’ as saying, ‘To what dregs of time are we reserved.’ Wesley uses it again in No. 102, ‘Of Former Times’, §2. Cf. also Law, Serious Call (Works, IV.25); and Christian Perfection (Works, III.117).
Cf. Milton, Paradise Lost, vi.143-44:
See also No. 79, ‘On Dissipation’, §15; and An Earnest Appeal, §52 (11:64 in this edn.)
And what more excellent than to render to God the honour due unto his name?
Pss. 29:2; 96:8 (BCP).
Ps. 58:10 (BCP).
2. How excellent is the design to prevent in any degree the dishonour done to his glorious name, the contempt which is poured on his authority, and the scandal brought upon our holy religion by the gross, flagrant wickedness of those who are still called by the name of Christ! To stem in any degree the torrent of 02:309 vice, to repress the floods of ungodliness, to remove in any measure those occasions of blaspheming the worthy name whereby we are called,
See Jas. 2:7.
See 1 Cor. 2:9.
3. And as this design thus evidently tends to bring ‘glory to God in the highest’, so it no less manifestly conduces to the establishing ‘peace upon earth’.
Luke 2:14.
Jas. 5:19-20.
4. Nor is it to individuals only, whether those who betray others into sin or those that are liable to be betrayed and destroyed by them, that the benefit of this design redounds, but to the whole community whereof we are members. For is it not a sure observation, ‘righteousness exalteth a nation’? And is it not as sure on the other hand that ‘sin is a reproach to any people’?
Prov. 14:34.
1 Sam. 2:30.
02:3105. But it is objected, ‘However excellent a design this is, it does not concern you. For are there not persons to whom the repressing these offences and punishing the offenders properly belong? Are there not constables and other parish officers, who are bound by oath to this very thing?’ There are. Constables and church wardens in particular are engaged by solemn oaths to give due information against profaners of the Lord’s day, and all other scandalous sinners. But if they leave it undone, if notwithstanding their oaths they trouble not themselves about the matter, it concerns all that fear God, that love mankind, and that wish well to their king and country, to pursue this design with the very same vigour as if there were no such officers existing. It being just the same thing, if they are of no use, as if they had no being.
6. ‘But this is only a pretence; their real design is to get money by giving informations.’ So it has frequently and roundly been affirmed, but without the least shadow of truth. The contrary may be proved by a thousand instances: no member of the Society takes any part of the money which is by the law allotted to the informer. They never did from the beginning, nor does any of them ever receive anything to suppress or withdraw their information. This is another mistake, if not wilful slander, for which there is not the least foundation.
7. ‘But the design is impracticable. Vice is risen to such an head that it is impossible to suppress it; especially by such means. For what can an handful of poor people do in opposition to all the world?’ ‘With men this is impossible, but not with God.’
Cf. Matt. 19:26.
See Jer. 46:23.
Cf. 1 Sam. 14:6.
Cf. Prov. 21:30.
8. ‘But if the end you aim at be really to reform sinners, you choose the wrong means. It is the Word of God must effect this, and not human laws. And it is the work of ministers, not of magistrates. Therefore the applying to these can only produce an outward reformation. It makes no change in the heart.’
02:311It is true the Word of God is the chief ordinary means whereby he changes both the hearts and lives of sinners; and he does this chiefly by the ministers of the gospel. But it is likewise true that the magistrate is ‘the minister of God’; and that he is designed of God ‘to be a terror to evil-doers’,
Cf. Rom. 13:3, 4.
See Rom. 2:5.
9. ‘Nay, rather more; for it makes many of them hypocrites, pretending to be what they are not. Others, by exposing them to shame, and putting them to expense, are made impudent and desperate in wickedness; so that in reality none of them are any better, if they are not worse than they were before.’
This is a mistake all over. For (1), where are these hypocrites? We know none who have pretended to be what they were not. (2). The exposing obstinate offenders to shame, and putting them to expense, does not make them desperate in offending, but afraid to offend. (3). Some of them, far from being worse, are substantially better, the whole tenor of their lives being changed. Yea, (4), some are inwardly changed, even ‘from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God’.
Acts 26:18.
10. ‘But many are not convinced that buying or selling on the Lord’s day is a sin.’
If they are not convinced, they ought to be: it is high time they should. The case is as plain as plain can be. For if an open, wilful breach both of the law of God and the law of the land is not sin, pray what is? And if such a breach both of divine and human laws is not to be punished because a man is not convinced it is a sin, there is an end of all execution of justice, and all men may live as they list.
11. ‘But mild methods ought to be tried first.’ They ought. And so they are. A mild admonition is given to every offender before the law is put in execution against him; nor is any man prosecuted till he has express notice that this will be the case unless he will prevent that prosecution by removing the cause of it. In every case the mildest method is used which the nature of the case will bear; 02:312nor are severer means ever applied but when they are absolutely necessary to the end.
12. ‘Well, but after all this stir about reformation, what real good has been done?’ Unspeakable good; and abundantly more than anyone could have expected in so short a time, considering the small number of the instruments, and the difficulties they had to encounter. Much evil has been already prevented, and much has been removed. Many sinners have been outwardly reformed; some have been inwardly changed. The honour of him whose name we bear, so openly affronted, has been openly defended. And it is not easy to determine how many and how great blessings even this little stand, made for God and his cause against his daring enemies, may already have derived upon our whole nation. On the whole, then, after all the objections that can be made, reasonable men may still conclude, a more excellent design could scarce ever enter into the heart of man.
III. 1. But what manner of men ought they to be who engage in such a design? Some may imagine any that are willing to assist therein ought readily to be admitted; and that the greater the number of members, the greater will be their influence. But this is by no means true; matter of fact undeniably proves the contrary. While the former Society for Reformation of Manners consisted of chosen members only, though neither many, rich, nor powerful, they broke through all opposition, and were eminently successful in every branch of their undertaking. But when a number of men, less carefully chosen, were received into that Society, they grew less and less useful till, by insensible degrees, they dwindled into nothing.
2. The number therefore of the members is no more to be attended to than the riches or eminence. This is a work of God. It is undertaken in the name of God, and for his sake. It follows that men who neither love nor fear God have no part or lot in this matter.
Acts 8:21.
Cf. Ps. 50:16-17 (BCP).
Cf. Matt. 7:5.
3. Not that this will suffice. Everyone engaging herein should be more than a harmless man.
Cf. No. 119, ‘Walking by Sight and Walking by Faith’, §18, where Wesley speaks of ‘hellish harmlessness’; see also No. 32, ‘Sermon on the Mount, XII’, II.2 and n.
Heb. 11:1.
Cf. 2 Cor. 4:18.
Cf. 2 Thess. 3:4.
Cf. Matt. 17:20; 1 Cor. 13:2.
Cf. Heb. 11:34.
Deut. 32:30; Josh. 23:10.
Cf. 2 Cor. 1:9.
4. He that has faith and confidence in God will of consequence be a man of courage. And such it is highly needful every man should be who engages in this undertaking. For many things will occur in the prosecution thereof which are terrible to nature; indeed so terrible that all who ‘confer with flesh and blood’
Cf. Gal. 1:16.
John and Charles Wesley, Hymns and Sacred Poems (1742), p. 137 (Poet. Wks., II.197). Orig., ‘While Jesus is near’.
02:3145. To courage, patience is nearly allied; the one regarding future, the other present evils. And whoever joins in carrying on a design of this nature will have great occasion for this. For notwithstanding all his unblameableness, he will find himself just in Ishmael’s situation, ‘his hand against every man, and every man’s hand against him’.
Gen. 16:12.
Cf. 2 Tim. 3:12.
1 John 3:10.
John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11.
Cf. Eph. 6:12.
1 Pet. 5:8.
Cf. Heb. 10:36.
6. And ye have need of steadiness, that ye may ‘hold fast this profession of your faith without wavering’.
Cf. Heb. 10:23.
Jas. 1:8.
Matt. 11:7.
Cf. Luke 9:62.
Cf. Mark 4:17.
7. Indeed it is hard for any to persevere in so unpleasing a work unless love overpowers both pain and fear. And therefore it is highly expedient that all engaged therein have ‘the love of God shed abroad in their hearts’;
Cf. Rom. 5:5.
1 John 4:19.
See S. of S. 3:1, etc.
John and Charles Wesley, ‘On a Journey’, Hymns and Sacred Poems (1740), p. 127 (Poet. Wks., I.304). Orig., ‘If thou, …’. Cf. Milton, Paradise Lost, iv.639-40:
See also Nos. 82, ‘On Temptation’, III.4; 84, The Important Question, III.6; Wesley’s letter to Hester Ann Roe, Oct. 6, 1776; and JWJ, Mar. 3, 1753, where he quotes the last two lines of this verse.
8. What adds a still greater sweetness even to labour and pain is the Christian love of our neighbour. When they ‘love their neighbour’, that is, every soul of man, ‘as themselves’,
Cf. Lev. 19:18, etc.
Cf. 2 Cor. 5:14.
Cf. Eph. 5:2.
Cf. Heb. 2:9.
Cf. 1 John 3:16. Notice the definition here of ‘brethren’ as ‘every man…’ and compare it with the similar definition of ‘neighbour’, cf. No. 7, ‘The Way to the Kingdom’, I.8 and n.
Isa. 33:14.
Samuel Wesley, Jun., ‘The Battle of the Sexes’, xxi.3-4 (Poems, 1736, p. 31); cf. Wesley, A Collection of Moral and Sacred Poems (1744), III.27.
So love both ‘hopeth and endureth all things’. So ‘charity never faileth.’
Cf. 1 Cor. 13:7-8.
9. Love is necessary for all the members of such a society on another account likewise; even because it ‘is not puffed up’;
1 Cor. 13:4.
Cf. Luke 18:9.
1 Pet. 5:5.
Cf. Ps. 121:2; Eccles. 3:14.
Cf. Phil. 2:13.
10. One point more whoever engages in this design should have deeply impressed on his heart, namely, that ‘the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.’
Jas. 1:20.
Cf. Matt. 11:29.
Cf. Eph. 4:1, 2.
2 Tim. 2:24.
Heb. 5:2.
Cf. 2 Tim. 2:25-26.
IV. 1. From the qualifications of those who are proper to engage in such an undertaking as this I proceed to show, fourthly, with what spirit and in what manner it ought to be pursued. First, with what spirit. Now this first regards the motive which is to be 02:317preserved in every step that is taken. For ‘if’ at any time ‘the light which is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!’ But ‘if thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light.’
Cf. Matt. 6:22-23.
For Wesley’s other uses of this metaphor, see No. 12, ‘The Witness of Our Own Spirit’, §11 and n.
2. But the spirit with which everything is to be done regards the temper, as well as the motive. And this is no other than that which has been described above. For the same courage, patience, steadiness, which qualify a man for the work, are to be exercised therein. ‘Above all’ let him ‘take the shield of faith’; this will quench a thousand fiery darts.
See Eph. 6:16.
Cf. 1 Cor. 16:14 (Notes).
See S. of S. 8:7.
Cf. Phil. 2:5.
1 Pet. 5:5.
Cf. Col. 3:12.
Cf. Rom. 12:21.
Rom. 12:12.
3. As to the outward manner of acting, a general rule is, let it be expressive of these inward tempers. But to be more particular. (1). Let every man beware not to ‘do evil that good may come’.
Rom. 3:8.
Cf. Eph. 4:25.
Cf. 2 Cor. 1:12.
Cf. 2 Cor. 4:2.
4. But let innocence be joined with prudence, properly so called. Not that offspring of hell which ‘the world’ calls prudence, which is mere craft, cunning dissimulation; but with that ‘wisdom from above’
Jas. 3:17. Cf. No. 109, The Trouble and Rest of Good Men, II.3, where Wesley defines ‘controversy’ as ‘the offspring of hell’. Cf. also, Nos. 138A and 138B, ‘On Dissimulation’.
Matt. 10:16.
5. Your manner of speaking, particularly to offenders, should be at all times deeply serious (lest it appear like insulting or triumphing over them), rather inclining to sad; showing that you pity them for what they do, and sympathize with them in what they suffer. Let your air and tone of voice, as well as words, be dispassionate, calm, mild; yea, where it would not appear like dissimulation, even kind and friendly. In some cases, where it will probably be received as it is meant, you may profess the goodwill you bear them; but at the same time (that it may not be thought to proceed from fear, or any wrong inclination) professing your intrepidity and inflexible resolution to oppose and punish vice to the uttermost.
V. 1. It remains only to make some application of what has been said, partly to you who are already engaged in this work, partly to all that fear God, and more especially to them that love as well as fear him.
02:319With regard to you who are already engaged in this work, the first advice I would give you is calmly and deeply to consider the nature of your undertaking. Know what you are about; be throughly acquainted with what you have in hand. Consider the objections which are made to the whole of your undertaking. And before you proceed, be satisfied that those objections have no real weight. Then may every man act as he is fully persuaded in his own mind.
See Rom. 14:5.
2. I advise you, secondly, be not in haste to increase your number. And in adding thereto regard not wealth, rank, or any outward circumstance. Only regard the qualifications above described. Inquire diligently whether the person proposed be of an unblameable carriage, and whether he be a man of faith, courage, patience, steadiness, whether he be a lover of God and man. If so, he will add to your strength as well as number. If not, you will lose by him more than you gain. For you will displease God. And be not afraid to purge out from among you any who do not answer the preceding character. By thus lessening your number you will increase your strength; you will be ‘vessels meet for your master’s use’.
Cf. 2 Tim. 2:21.
3. I would, thirdly, advise you narrowly to observe from what motive you at any time act or speak. Beware that your intention be not stained with any regard either to profit or praise. Whatever you do, ‘do it to the Lord,’
Cf. Col. 3:23.
Eph. 6:6.
See Acts 27:23.
See Matt. 6:22.
4. I advise you, in the fourth place, see that you do everything in a right temper, with lowliness and meekness, with patience and gentleness, worthy the gospel of Christ. Take every step trusting in God, and in the most tender, loving spirit you are able. Meantime watch always against all hurry and dissipation of spirit, and pray always with all earnestness and perseverance that your faith fail not. And let nothing interrupt that spirit of sacrifice which you make of all you have and are, of all you suffer and do, that it may be an offering of a sweet smelling savour to God
See Eph. 5:2.
02:3205. As to the manner of acting and speaking, I advise you to do it with all innocence and simplicity, prudence, and seriousness. Add to these all possible calmness and mildness; nay, all the tenderness which the case will bear. You are not to behave as butchers or hangmen, but as surgeons rather, who put the patient to no more pain than is necessary in order to the cure. For this purpose each of you likewise has need of ‘a lady’s hand with a lion’s heart’.
Cf. Oxford Dictionary of English Proverbs, ‘Surgeon’, where the first citation is dated 1589, attributed to L. Wright, Display of Dutie, 37(a): ‘In a good chirurgian a hawkes eye, a lyons heart, and a ladies hand.’ See also Thomas Adams (fl. 1612-53; called by Robert Southey ‘the prose Shakespeare of Puritan theologians’), Sermons (1861), I.43: ‘We say of the chirurgian that he should have a lady’s hand and a lion’s heart; but the Christian soldier should have a lady’s heart and a lion’s hand.’ Cf. also Wesley’s letter to his brother Charles, dated twenty-five days earlier than this sermon, Jan. 5, 1763, where he also uses this proverb.
1 Pet. 2:12.
6. I exhort all of you who fear God, as ever you hope to find mercy at his hands, as you dread being found (though you knew it not) ‘even to fight against God’,
Acts 5:39.
Cf. Gal. 6:10.
See Matt. 23:4.
Cf. Judg. 5:23.
02:3217. I have an higher demand upon you who love, as well as fear, God. He whom you fear, whom you love, has qualified you for promoting his work in a more excellent way.
Cf. No. 89 by this title.
See 1 John 4:21.
See Matt. 5:43-44.
Cf. Col. 3:12.
Cf. Eph. 4:2.
See John 17:3.
Prov. 29:25.
Cf. Wisd. 5:1.
Ps. 78:10 (BCP).
Phil. 4:13.
Mark 9:23.
Cf. 2 Tim. 2:12.
Cf. No. 31, ‘Sermon on the Mount, XI’, III.4 and n.
Cf. Matt. 7:14.
Tobit 3:4.
Cf. Matt. 5:11.
Ps. 103:19.
Matt. 10:30.
John 18:11.
Cf. 1 Pet. 4:14.
Mark 10:7; cf. Gen. 2:24.
Cf. Matt. 23:23.
Cf. Matt. 10:37.
Matt. 9:13.
See Ps. 79:12.
Dan. 3:6, 11, 15.
Cf. Isa. 43:2.
Cf. Matt. 16:24, etc.
See 1 Cor. 4:13.
Cf. Philem. 15.
Cf. Acts 26:19.
See Phil. 3:8.
Matt. 6:34.
Cf. 1 Pet. 5:7.
Cf. 1 Pet. 4:19.
« « « « « « «
The original edition, as also that of 1778, appended:
“The form of a Donation by Will.
Item. I, A. B., do hereby give and bequeath the sum of _____ unto the Treasurer for the time being of a voluntary society commonly called or known by the name of ‘The Society for Reformation of Manners’ (which Society doth now usually meet in St. Martins le Grand, near Newgate Street, London) the same to be paid within _____ months after my decease, and to be applied to the uses and purposes of the said Society.
Subscriptions and donations are taken in by Messrs.
Williams and Bellamy, near the Mansion House, London.
Mr. Edward Webber, near the East India House.
Mr. William Park, in Holiwell Street, Strand.
Mr. Crook, Great Turn-Stile, Holbourn.
Mr. Osgood, in St. Martin’s Court, near Leicester Fields.
”« « « « « « «
Appendix to the Works, edition of 1771:
“N.B. After this Society had subsisted several years, and done unspeakable good, it was wholly destroyed by a verdict given against it in the King’s Bench, with three hundred pounds damages. I doubt a severe account remains for the witnesses, the jury, and all who were concerned in that dreadful affair.In JWJ, Feb. 2, 1766, Wesley wrote: ‘I dined with W. Welsh, the father of the late Society for Reformation of Manners. But that excellent design is at a full stop. They have indeed convicted the wretch who by wilful perjury carried the cause against them in Westminster Hall; but they could never recover the expense of that suit. Lord, how long shall the ungodly triumph?’
A fresh beginning in the same cause, and under the same name, was made by William Wilberforce in 1787, and it flourished even more effectively than its predecessors, well into the latter half of the nineteenth century. See R. A. Soloway, Prelates and People: Ecclesiastical Social Thought in England, 1783-1852 (Toronto, Univ. of Toronto Press, 1969), 354-56.
How to Cite This Entry
Bibliography:
, “.” In , edited by . , 2024. Entry published February 28, 2024. https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon052.About this Entry
Entry Title: Sermon 52: The Reformation of Manners