Notes:
Sermon 61: The Mystery of Iniquity
Wesley had a dramatic ‘theology of history’. Its plot revolved around the grim discrepancies that stretch out between the perfections of the original creation and of its eventual restoration—between what history should (and could) have been and what had, in fact, transpired. Within this perspective, he could see the whole of history as a tragic drama of fallings away and partial restorations from each of which, in its turn, there then followed yet another falling away. And yet such is the power of sovereign grace that God’s design is never nullified by any of these outworkings of ‘the mystery of iniquity’. Consequently, both the Christian’s hopes for the human future and the imperatives to holy living are bolstered by the assurance that God’s designs will yet be realized. This sermon is a comment on some of the dramatic moments in the dismal story, climaxed by a ringing cry of hope.
Wesley’s first recorded use of 2 Thess. 2:7 is in 1756 (September 19); he returned to it twice in 1782 (December 20, 22) and twice more in 1783 (March 7, 10). This suggests a closer correlation than usual between his oral preaching and a written sermon, for this one first appeared (without a title and numbered XV) in the Arminian Magazine for May and June 1783 (VI.229-37, 285-94). In 1788 it was placed in a different order in SOSO, V.147-70, and given the title it has carried since. It was not published separately, but Wesley records yet another oral sermon on the text in 1790 (July 15).
02:452 The Mystery of Iniquity2 Thessalonians 2:7
The mystery of iniquity doth already work.
11. Without inquiring how far these words refer to any particular event in the Christian church, I would at present take occasion from them to consider that important question—in what manner ‘the mystery of iniquity’ hath ‘wrought’ among us till it hath wellnigh covered the whole earth.
22. It is certain that God ‘made man upright’,
Eccles. 7:29.
Another typical conjunction of holiness and happiness; see No. 5, ‘Justification by Faith’, I.4 and n.
Cf. Heb. 1:3.
1 John 2:2.
Cf. Col. 3:10.
33. This great ‘mystery of godliness’
1 Tim. 3:16.
Cf. Rev. 13:8.
Heb. 11:6[cf. 5 and 4].
44. But how exceeding small was the number of these, even from [02:453]the earliest ages! No sooner did ‘the sons of men multiply upon
the face of the earth’ than ‘God’, looking down from heaven, ‘saw that the
wickedness of man was great upon earth;’ so great ‘that every imagination of the
thoughts of his heart was evil, only evil’, and that ‘continually’.
Gen.
6:1-5. Ver. 7.
55. ‘Only Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord,’ being ‘a just man and perfect in his generations.’
Gen. 6:8-9.
66. Yea, how did it work even in the posterity of Abraham, in God’s chosen people! Were not these also, down to Moses, to David, to Malachi, to Herod the Great, ‘a faithless and stubborn generation’?
Ps. 78:9 (BCP).
Cf. Isa. 1:4.
Cf. Ps. 10:4.
See Eph. 4:19.
77. In the fullness of time, when iniquity of every kind, when ungodliness and unrighteousness had spread over all nations, and covered the earth as a flood; it pleased God to lift up a standard against it, by ‘bringing his first-begotten into the world’.
Cf. Heb. 1:6.
Luke 2:32; cf. Jer. 3:23.
See Num. 14:21.
Acts 1:15.
Mark 14:50.
Cf. John 7:39.
88. It was then, when he had ‘ascended up on high, and led captivity captive’,
Cf. Eph. 4:8.
Cf. Acts 1:4.
Cf. Matt. 28:18.
Chap. 2:1-4.
Ps. 147:3 (BCP).
[Cf.] Chap. 2, ver. 41.
Cf. Acts 2:47 in the AV and in Wesley’s Notes; this is Wesley’s correction of the AV’s translation of σωζομένους (AV: ‘such as should be saved’). Even so, Greek participles usually imply a process; thus, most modern translations (e.g., NEB) have it, ‘such as were being saved’.
99. In order clearly to see how they were already saved we need only observe the short account of them which is recorded in the latter part of the second and in the fourth chapter. ‘They 02:455continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine, and in the fellowship, and in the breaking of bread, and in the prayers:’
Cf. Acts 2:42.
Chap. 2.
Chap. 2:41, 44-45.
Chap. 4:31-32[4:32].
Ver. 34-35[ver. 33-35].
1010. But here a question will naturally occur. How came they to act thus, to have all things in common, seeing we do not read of any positive command to do this? I answer, there needed no outward command: the command was written on their hearts. It naturally and necessarily resulted from the degree of love which they enjoyed. Observe! ‘They were of one heart and of one soul: and not so much as one’ (so the words run) ‘said’ (they could not, while their hearts so overflowed with love) ‘that any of the things which he possessed was his own.’ And wheresoever the same cause shall prevail the same effect will naturally follow.
1111. Here was the dawn of the proper gospel day. Here was a proper Christian church. It was now ‘the Sun of righteousness rose’ upon the earth, ‘with healing in his wings.’
Cf. Mal. 4:2.
Matt. 1:21.
Matt. 9:35.
Cf. Ps. 41:4.
1 Pet. 1:8.
1202:45612. But how soon did ‘the mystery of iniquity’ work again and obscure the glorious prospect! It began to work (not openly indeed, but covertly) in two of the Christians, Ananias and Sapphira. ‘They sold their possession’ like the rest, and probably for the same motive. But afterwards, giving place to the devil, and reasoning with flesh and blood, they ‘kept back part of the price’.
Acts 5:1-2.
Cf. 1 Tim. 1:19.
Cf. Heb. 10:39.
1 John 2:12-14.
Another echo of Wesley’s mounting frustration with his own Methodists in their new-found affluence. Cf. intro. to No. 50, ‘The Use of Money’.
1 John 2:15.
1313. However, this plague was stayed in the first Christian church by instantly
cutting off the infected persons. And by that signal judgment of God on the first
offenders, ‘great fear came upon all’,
Acts 5:11. Ver.
14.
1414. If we inquire in what manner the mystery of iniquity, the energy of Satan,
began to work again in the Christian church, we shall find it wrought in quite a
different way, putting on quite another shape. Partiality crept in among the
Christian believers. Those by whom the distribution to everyone was made had respect
of persons, largely supplying those of their own nation, while the other ‘widows’
who were not Hebrews ‘were neglected in the daily administration’.
Chap.
6:1.
Cf. Acts 4:37.
1515. The infection did not stop here, but one evil produced many more. From partiality in the Hebrews ‘there arose in the Grecians a murmuring against them;’
Cf. Acts 6:1.
Heb. 12:15.
Acts 9:31.
1616. It seems to have been some time after this that the mystery of iniquity began to work in the form of zeal.
Cf. the comment on misguided zeal, in the rather different context, in Wesley’s sermon ‘On Zeal’, §1, written earlier (1781) but placed in a different order in SOSO, VII (see No. 92); note Wesley’s suggestions as to how even zeal may be corrupted in ‘the mystery of iniquity’.
Chap. 15:28-29.
1717. Nearly allied to this was another grievous evil which at the same time sprang up in the church: want of mutual forbearance, and of consequence anger, strife, contention, variance. One very remarkable instance of this we find in this very chapter. When ‘Paul said to Barnabas, Let us visit the brethren where we have preached the word, Barnabas determined to take with him John,’
Acts 15:36-37.
Cf. Col. 4:10.
Cf. Acts 15:38.
Cf. Acts 15:39, where the text reads ἐγένετο δὲ παροξυσμός. Another instance of Wesley’s insistence that Barnabas alone was caught up in this ‘fit of anger’; cf. No. 22, ‘Sermon on the Mount, II’, III.10 and n.
The AM text does not have this ‘only’, which may have been a printer’s error. It appears in 1788 and obviously fills out the sense. In the MS errata to that vol. Wesley did not challenge it.
Ver. 41.
1818. The very first society of Christians at Rome were not altogether free from
this evil leaven. There were ‘divisions and offences’
[Rom.] 16:17.
Eph. 5:2.
1 Cor. 12:25.
1 Cor. 11:19.
1 Cor. 5:1[; cf. Wesley’s tr. in his Notes].
Chap. 6:9-10.
1919. When St. James wrote his Epistle, directed more immediately ‘to the twelve tribes scattered abroad’,
Jas. 1:1.
Jas. 2:26; cf. No. 35, ‘The Law Established through Faith, I’, §4 and n.; see also intro, to Nos. 33-35.
Jas. 3:15.
Cf. Jas. 3:16.
2020. St. Peter wrote about the same time to ‘the strangers’, the Christians ‘scattered abroad through’ all those spacious provinces of ‘Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia (Minor) and Bithynia’.
Cf. 1 Pet. 1:1.
Cf. 1 Pet. 1:19.
2 Pet. 2:1, etc.
Jude 12.
2 Pet. 2:14, 17.
2121. Such is the authentic account of the mystery of iniquity, working even in the apostolic churches! An account given, not by the Jews or heathens, but by the apostles themselves. To this we may add the account which is given by the Head and Founder of the church—him ‘who holds the stars in his right hand’,
Cf. Rev. 2:1.
Rev. 3:14.
Rev. 3:8.
Cf. Rev. 2:5.
2222. Such was the real state of the Christian church, even during the first century, while not only St. John, but most of the apostles, were present with and presided over it. But what a mystery is this! That the all-wise, the all-gracious, the Almighty should suffer it so to be! Not in one only, but as far as we can learn in every Christian society, those of Smyrna and Philadelphia excepted. And how came these to be excepted? Why were these less corrupted (to go no farther) than the other churches of Asia? It seems, because they were less wealthy. The Christians in Philadelphia were not literally ‘increased in goods’,
Cf. Rev. 3:17.
2323. But how contrary is this scriptural account of the ancient Christians to the ordinary apprehensions of men! We have been apt to imagine that the primitive church was all excellence and 2:461perfection! Answerable to that strong description which St. Peter cites from Moses: ‘Ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a peculiar people.’
1 Pet. 2:9; cf. Exod. 19:6.
Lam. 4:1.
Isa. 1:22.
2 Cor. 4:4.
2424. And if the state of the church in the very first century was so bad, we cannot suppose it was any better in the second. Undoubtedly it grew worse and worse. Tertullian,
(c. 160-c. 220); a gifted pioneer in Latin Christianity, famous both for his apologetic writings (e.g., Apology [c. 198]) and polemics (e.g., Against Marcion [207 et seq.]). Wesley knew, of course, that Tertullian had become a Montanist and a fierce critic of the spiritual apathy and moral laxity of the generality of nominal Christians in his day, labelling them ‘psychics’ (which would come close to Wesley’s ‘almost Christians’). Cf. his essays On Modesty, On Fasting, and Against Praxeas, espec. §1; see also Ernest Evans, Tertullian’s Treatise Against Praxeas (1948), pp. 81, 187.
Wesley had read John Lacy’s critical account of Montanus in his General Delusions of Christians… (1713); see pp. 242 ff. But see also a sympathetic appraisal of Montanism in Gottfried Arnold’s Unparteyische Kirchen–und ketzer–historie… (1668), Pt. 1, Bk. II, ch. 4. See No. 68, ‘The Wisdom of God’s Counsels’, §9; and also No. 15, The Great Assize, II.2 and n.
Cf. Heb. 12:14; the parallels here between Montanus and Wesley are obvious enough and also certainly self-conscious.
2525. Cyprian, Bishop of Carthage,
The chief problems of St. Cyprian’s letters centre around the terms on which ‘lapsed Christians’ may be received back into communion with the Catholic church, on the unity of the church and her episcopacy, the baptism of infants, etc. Wesley has exaggerated Cyprian’s passing criticisms of ‘the generality of both the laity and the clergy’ and has misinterpreted Cyprian’s defence of the Christians against the charge by a Roman official (Demetrianus, pro-consul of Africa) that the Christians are to blame for all the woes of ‘the declining world’ (cf. Treatise V, An Address to Demetrianus [ANF, V.457-65]). Cyprian agrees that the world is declining and that human affairs are desperate (‘the world has now grown old’). But he denies that the Christians are the cause of the decline, and suggests that the Romans have hastened the end by their unjust persecution of the Christians among whom (§20) ‘there flourishes the strength of hope and the firmness of faith’ (cf. the triumphant peroration in §25). For other references to St. Cyprian, cf. Nos. 102, ‘Of Former Times’, §17; 104, ‘On Attending the Church Service’, §14; and see also 54, ‘On Eternity’, §10 and n.
For other references to the church as a ‘mixed society’, cf. No. 104, ‘On Attending the Church Service’, §13 and n.
2626. It is true that during this whole period, during the first three centuries, there were intermixed longer or shorter seasons wherein true Christianity revived. In those seasons the justice and mercy of God let loose the heathens upon the Christians. Many of these were then called to resist unto blood. And the blood of the martyrs was the seed of the church.
An aphorism so familiar that Wesley omits quotation marks; cf. John Favour’s Antiquity Triumphing Over Novelty (1619), p. 469; or Samuel Purchas, Pilgrimes (1625); and Thomas Fuller’s Church History. It is a paraphrase from Tertullian’s Apologeticus, L.13: ‘Plures efficimur, quotiens metimur a vobis; semen est sanguis christianorum’ (‘We increase, even while we are being mown down by you [pagans]; the blood of the Christians is seed’). See No. 23, ‘Sermon on the Mount, III’, III.5 and n.
Cf. Acts 20:24.
Cf. Rev. 2:5.
2727. Persecution never did, never could give any lasting wound to genuine Christianity. But the greatest it ever received, the grand blow which was struck at the very root of that humble, gentle, patient love, which is the fulfilling of the Christian law, the 02:463whole essence of true religion, was struck in the fourth century by Constantine the Great, when he called himself a Christian, and poured in a flood of riches, honours, and power upon the Christians, more especially upon the clergy.
Wesley’s negative view of the Constantinian ‘fall of the church’ grew emphatic over the years; cf., e.g., Nos. 64, ‘The New Creation’, §4; 66, ‘The Signs of the Times’, II.7; 89, ‘The More Excellent Way’, §2; 97, ‘On Obedience to Pastors’, I.3; 102, ‘Of Former Times’, §§15, 16; 104, ‘On Attending the Church Service’, §14; 112, On Laying the Foundation of the New Chapel, II.6; 121, ‘Prophets and Priests’, §8. Cf. also, A Farther Appeal, Pt. III, I.7 (11:276 in this edn.), and ‘Thoughts Upon a Late Phenomenon’ (AM, 1789, XII.46-49). But see No. 68, ‘The Wisdom of God’s Counsels’, §8, where Wesley speaks of the ‘fall of the church’ coming (long before Constantine) when the love of money caused the first breach in the ‘community of goods’.
This was in sharp contrast to Thomas Newton’s triumphalist view in his Dissertations on the Prophecies, which have remarkably been fulfilled, and at this time are fulfilling the world (2nd edn., London, 1760), III.69-74. Newton, at this time Bishop of Bristol, had made the point that Constantine’s reign fulfilled the Apocalypse prophecy of ‘the sixth seal, or period’—of ‘a great earthquake or rather a great concussion (σεῖσμος μέγας)… And where was ever a greater concussion or removal than when Christianity was advanced to the throne of paganism and idolatry gave place to true religion? … [This was] one of the greatest and most memorable revolutions which ever was in the world….’ Later (pp. 210-14), Newton portrays the struggle between Christianity and paganism as the earthly counterpart of ‘the war in heaven between the angels of darkness and the angels of light’; (p. 212), ‘Constantine himself and the Christians of his time describe his conquests under the same image; as if they had understood that this prophecy had received its accomplishment in him.’
William Weston had also seen the hand of providence in the Constantinian liberation; cf. his Dissertation on Some of the Most Remarkable Wonders of Antiquity (Cambridge, 1748). Cf. also Joseph Milner, The History of the Church of Christ from the Days of the Apostles to 1753, espec. II.38-41. Cf. also Laurence Echard, A General Ecclesiastical History, (5th edn., 1719), Bk. III, v-vi.467-72; William Cave, Ecclesiastics, pp. 267-78; and Mosheim, Institutiones Historiae Ecclesiasticae, I.i.10.
A lapse of memory here; this is not Sallust but a garbled version, to the same point, of Velleius Paterculus, History of Rome, ‘Liber Posterior’, II.i.2-5: ‘Quippe remoto Carthaginis metu sublataque imperii aemula non gradu, sed praecipiti cursu a virtute descitum, ad vitia transcursum’ (‘When Rome was freed of the fear of Carthage and her rival for empire was out ofher way, the path of [civic] virtue was abandoned for that of corruption, not gradually but in headlong haste’).
A more nearly accurate quotation of Ovid, Metamorphoses, i.128-31 (except for ‘fugere’, which should read ‘fugitque’, and ‘dolusque’, a printer’s error for ‘dolique’). The verse translation may be Wesley’s own; it is not in the standard translations of his time by Arthur Golding (1565-67) and Dryden (Garth’s edn., 1717). Cf. the slightly different version of these lines in No. 128, ‘The Deceitfulness of the Human Heart’, §1, and yet another verse translation—again, probably, by Wesley.
2828. And this is the event which most Christian expositors mention with such triumph! Yea, which some of them suppose to be typified in the Revelation by the ‘New Jerusalem coming down from heaven’!
Rev. 21:2; cf. Thomas Newton, op. cit., p. 212. See also No. 102, ‘Of Former Times’, §15.
An echo of Juan de Valdes’s ironic phrase about ‘the saints of the world’; see No. 4, Scriptural Christianity, II.5 and n.
2929. Has the case been altered since the Reformation? Does the mystery of iniquity no longer work in the church? No. The Reformation itself has not extended to above one-third even of the western church. So that two-thirds of this remain as they were;
Cf. No. 63, ‘The General Spread of the Gospel’, §7, where Wesley again makes the same point, and §16 for his reference to Luther’s saying that revivals last no longer than one generation. For population statistics, cf. No. 15, The Great Assize, II.4 and n. on Edward Brerewood.
A comment on the surface issues, at least, of the Puritan controversy (i.e., over vestments, the Prayer Book, and prelacy).
Matt. 23:17, 19.
Cf. Phil. 2:5.
Cf. 1 John 2:6.
I.e., Hindustan or India. Addison also used the term ‘Indostan’ as Wesley does here; cf. R. W. Harris, Reason and Nature in Eighteenth Century Thought (London, Blandford Press, 1968), p. 107. See also No. 69, ‘The Imperfection of Human Knowledge’, II.4.
Cf. John and Charles Wesley, Hymns on the Lord’s Supper (1745), p. 128:
3030. Is not this the ‘falling away’ or ‘apostasy’ from God foretold 02:466by St. Paul in his Second Epistle to the Thessalonians?
Chap. 2, ver.
3. [See also No. 1, Salvation by Faith, II.4 and
n.]
Founder of the Society of Friends, 1624-91, whose career, doctrines, and Journal suggest more than a few striking comparisons with Wesley’s. The citation here of Fox’s assertion of a ‘universal apostasy’ appears to have been Wesley’s inference from passages in the Journal (1832 edn.), p. 116—in 1652: (1) ‘I shewed also the state of apostacy since the apostles’ days;’ (2) pp. 599-600 (1686): ‘the long night of apostacy’; (3) pp. 364-65 (1633): ‘…to shew that now the everlasting gospel was preached over the head of the whore, beast, false prophets, and anti-christs which had arose since the apostles’ days…’. See also some of Fox’s broadsheets; e.g., ‘For Your Whoredoms in the City of London is the Hand of the Lord Stretched Forth Against Thee’ (1660?). For another reference to Fox, cf. No. 68, ‘The Wisdom of God’s Counsels’, §9 and n.
3131. I would now refer it to every man of reflection who believes the Scriptures to be of God whether this general apostasy does not imply the necessity of a general reformation? Without allowing this, how can we possibly justify either the wisdom or goodness of God? According to Scripture the Christian religion was designed ‘for the healing of the nations’;
Rev. 22:2.
Rom. 11:26.
Rom. 11:25.
Isa. 60:18, 21.
3232. From the preceding considerations we may learn the full answer to one of the grand objections of infidels against Christianity, namely, the lives of Christians. Of Christians, do you say? I doubt whether you ever knew a Christian in your life. When 02:467Tomo Chachi,
Cf. JWJ, Feb. 13, 1736, and the diary for Easter 1736; June 29, 1736; and Apr. 11, 1737.
AM orig., here and in the preceding sentence, ‘there’, altered by Wesley to ‘these’ in his errata and MS annotations.
π; Cf. No. 63, ‘The General Spread of the Gospel’, §22.
3333. We may learn from hence, secondly, the extent of the fall, the astonishing spread of original corruption. What! among so many thousands, so many millions, is there none righteous, no not one?
See Rom. 3:10.
Juvenal, Satires, xiii.26-27: ‘Good men are rare; scarcely more in number than the gates of Thebes or the mouths of the enriching Nile’ (i.e., seven).
As if he had allowed too much in supposing there were a hundred good men in the Roman Empire he comes to himself, and affirms there are hardly seven. Nay, surely there were seven thousand! There were so many long ago in one small nation where Elijah supposed there were none at all. But, allowing a few exceptions, we are authorized to say, ‘The whole world lieth in wickedness;’
1 John 5:19 (cf. Notes).
Cf. §29 above, and n.
O sacred name of Christian! how profaned!
Cf. Milton, Paradise Lost, iv.951, “‘O sacred name of faithfulness profaned!’”
O earth, earth, earth!
Jer. 22:29.
3434. From many of the preceding circumstances we may learn, thirdly, what is the genuine tendency of riches: what a baleful influence they have had in all ages upon pure and undefiled religion. Not that money is an evil of itself: it is applicable to good as well as bad purposes. But nevertheless it is an undoubted truth that ‘the love of money is the root of all evil;’
1 Tim. 6:10.
Juvenal, Satires, xiv.139: ‘the love of money grows in proportion as wealth accumulates.’ This same line is repeated in No. 131, ‘The Danger of Increasing Riches’, II.14, with still another translation by Wesley.
‘As money increases, so does the love of it’—and always will, without a miracle of grace. Although therefore other causes may concur, yet this has been in all ages the principal cause of the decay of true religion in every Christian community. As long as the Christians in any place were poor they were devoted to God. While they had little of the world they did not love the world; but the more they had of it the more they loved it. This constrained the Lover of their souls at various times to unchain their persecutors, who by reducing them to their former poverty reduced them to their former purity. But still remember: riches have in all ages been the bane of genuine Christianity.
3535. We may learn hence, fourthly, how great watchfulness they need who desire to be real Christians, considering what a state the world is in! May not each of them well say,
02:469Charles Wesley, Hymns and Sacred Poems (1749), II.126 (Poet. Wks., V.268). The orig. text reads, ‘Wild human beasts’; the present reading is John’s ‘improvement’, as printed in AM. See also No. 69, ‘The Imperfection of Human Knowledge’, II.4, where Wesley has linked ‘ruffians’, ‘wolves’, and ‘bears’.
They are the most dangerous because they commonly appear in sheep’s clothing.
Matt. 7:15.
Torquato Tasso, Godfrey of Bulloigne; or the Recoverie of Jerusalem (tr. by Edward Fairfax, 1600), Bk. IV, st. 65, l. 5: ‘He knows, who fears no God, he loves no friend.’ Cf. also Wesley’s letter to Miss March, June 17, 1774.
Therefore stand upon your guard against everyone that is not earnestly seeking to save his soul. We have need to keep both our heart and mouth ‘as with a bridle, while the ungodly are in our sight’.
Cf. Ps. 39:2 (BCP).
Prov. 28:14.
Cf. 1 Tim. 5:22.
Cf. Matt. 26:41.
3636. We may learn from hence, lastly, what thankfulness becomes those who have escaped the corruption that is in the world, whom God hath chosen out of the world to be holy and unblameable. ‘Who is it that maketh thee to differ? And what hast thou which thou hast not received?’
1 Cor. 4:7 (Notes).
Cf. Phil. 2:13.
Cf. Ps. 107:2 (BCP).
Cf. 2 Cor. 1:10.
Cf. Rom. 8:22.
See Ps. 98:3.
How to Cite This Entry
Bibliography:
, “.” In , edited by . , 2024. Entry published February 29, 2024. https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon061.About this Entry
Entry Title: Sermon 61: The Mystery of Iniquity