Notes:
Sermon 64: The New Creation
The aged Wesley returned again and again to his vision of cosmic redemption: the restoration of all creation, including the entire human family, as the final, full benefit of God’s unbounded love. This sermon was written in 1785 for inclusion in the November and December issues of the Arminian Magazine for that year (Vol. VIII), numbered XXX, without a title and no further indication of place or date. The only prior reference to a sermon on Rev. 21:5 comes just two years earlier (January 1, 1783); the only other recorded instance comes five years later (August 4, 1790). This present sermon was placed in SOSO (V.209-22), with its present title and in the series of essays in Wesleyan eschatology that had begun with ‘God’s Love to Fallen Man’. It is remarkable for its unusual level of speculation (more than Wesley was wont to allow himself) and for its numerous allusions to the speculations of others, including an almost casual passing reference to a then quite lively controversy about ‘the plurality of [inhabited] worlds’. Wesley’s endorsement of the then novel idea of progress reflects his unfaltering optimism, in his case an optimism of grace rather than of nature.
The New CreationRevelation 21:5
Behold, I make all things new.
11. What a strange scene is here opened to our view! How remote from all our natural apprehensions! Not a glimpse of what is here revealed was ever seen in the heathen world.
Wesley would, as a matter of course, have known the myth of Er which stands as the apocalyptic climax of Plato’s Republic; why would he have regarded this as radically noncomparable with the biblical apocalypse?
See 2 Tim. 3:5.
22. It must be allowed that after all the researches we can make, still our knowledge of the great truth which is delivered to us in these words is exceedingly short and imperfect. As this is a point of mere
Cf. Johnson’s definition of ‘mere’ as ‘this only; such and nothing else’.
See Heb. 6:5.
Cf. No. 5, ‘Justification by Faith’, §2 and n.; but see also No. 62, ‘The End of Christ’s Coming’, III.5 and n.
33. The Apostle, caught up in the visions of God, tells us in the first verse of the chapter, ‘I saw a new heaven and a new earth;’
Rev. 21:1.
[Rev. 21,] ver. 5.
44. Very many commentators entertain a strange opinion that this relates only to the present state of things, and gravely tell us that the words are to be referred to the flourishing state of the church, which commenced after the heathen persecutions. Nay, some of them have discovered that all which the Apostle speaks concerning the ‘new heaven and the new earth’ was fulfilled when Constantine the Great poured in riches and honours upon the Christians.
Cf. No. 61, ‘The Mystery of Iniquity’, §27 and n.
>See Luke 7:30.
55. Thus saith the Creator and Governor of the universe, ‘Behold, I make all things new:’ all which are included in that expression of the Apostle, ‘a new heaven and a new earth’. ‘A new heaven’: the original word in Genesis (chapter one) is in the plural number. And indeed this is the constant language of Scripture—not heaven, but heavens. Accordingly the ancient Jewish writers are accustomed to reckon three heavens. In conformity to which the apostle Paul speaks of his being ‘caught up into the third heaven’.
Cf. 2 Cor. 12:2.
66. We cannot think that this heaven will undergo any change, any more than its great inhabitant. Surely this palace of the Most High was the same from eternity, and will be world without end.
Eph. 3:21.
Orig., ‘heavens’; Wesley deletes the ‘s’ in his annotated copy.
Cf. Wesley’s Notes on 2 Pet. 3:7, where he prefers the reading, ‘destruction’, in the Geneva Bible rather than the AV reading, ‘perdition’.
Cf. 2 Pet. 3:10-12; and note Wesley’s paraphrase and conflation of the text.
Cf. Rev. 6:16.
Cf. Rev. 20:11.
77. At the same time ‘the stars shall fall from heaven,’
Matt. 24:29.
I.e., this earth and its ‘heaven’ (atmosphere) as in Aristotelian and Ptolemaic astronomy; for this whole passage, cf. John Ray’s third discourse in Three Physico-Theological Discourses…III. The Dissolution of the World (4th edn. by William Derham, 1732).
Cf. 2 Pet. 3:10.
2 Pet. 3:7, etc. [i.e., 7, 13].
88. One considerable difference there will undoubtedly be in the starry heaven when it is created anew; there will be no blazing stars, no comets there.
Cf. No. 56, ‘God’s Approbation of His Works’, I.10 and n.
Speculation as to the plurality of habitable worlds has a long history. Cicero, De Natura Deorum (On the Nature of the Gods), I.x.25, quotes Anaximenes as having held ‘that there are [inhabited] worlds, countless in number’; cf.ibid. I.xxxix.98. See also Henry More, Democritus Platonissans; Or An Essay Upon the Infinity of Worlds Out of Platonic Principles (Cambridge, 1647); and Christian Huygens, The Celestial Worlds Discovered, Or Conjectures on the Planetary Worlds (1722), p. 18. Wesley’s interest in this is reflected in his quotation from Louis Dutens, Inquiry into the Origin of the Discoveries Attributed to the Moderns (1769), about ‘the notion of the plurality of worlds’ lately popularized ‘thanks to the elegant work of Mr. de Fontenelle’; see Wesley’s Survey , V.114. This was Bernard de Bovier de Fontenelle, whose Conversations On the Plurality of Worlds had become a conversation piece in eighteenth-century England. It had had four separate English translations (the first by the English novelist, Mrs. Aphra Behn) from 1688 to 1760. It is not known which of these Wesley had read.
99. We may more easily conceive the changes which will be wrought in the lower heaven, in the region of the air. It will be no more torn by hurricanes, or agitated by furious storms or destructive tempests. Pernicious or terrifying meteors will have no more place therein. We shall have no more occasion to say,
Watts, ‘A Song to Creating Wisdom’, Pt. II, st. vii, in Horae Lyricae (1705). Twelve stanzas of this appear in Wesley’s A Collection of Psalms and Hymns (1738); it reappears in A Collection of Hymns for the Use of the People Called Methodists (1780), No. 217 (Vol. 7 of this edn.).
02:504No; all will be then light, fair, serene—a lively picture of the eternal day.
1010. All the elements (taking that word in the common sense for the principles of which all natural beings are compounded)
Viz., earth, air, fire, and water.
See No. 15, The Great Assize, III.3 and n.
1111. It has been already observed that the calm, placid air will be no more disturbed by storms and tempests. There will be no
more meteors with their horrid glare, affrighting the poor children of men. May we
not add (though at first it may sound like a paradox) that there will be no more
rain. It is observable that there was none in paradise; a circumstance which Moses
particularly mentions: ‘The Lord God had not caused it to rain upon the earth. But
there went up a mist from the earth,’ which then covered up the abyss of waters,
‘and watered the whole face of the ground’
Gen. 2:5-6.
Cf. Milton, Paradise Lost, x.1065-67:
Cf. ibid., iv.156-58:
1212. But what change will the element of water undergo when all things are made new? It will be in every part of the world clear and limpid, pure from all unpleasing or unhealthful mixtures; rising here and there in crystal fountains to refresh and adorn the earth ‘with liquid lapse of murmuring stream’.
Ibid., viii.263. See No. 56, ‘God’s Approbation of His Works’, I.4 and n.
Rev. 21:1.
Gen. 1:9.
>Cf. Gen. 7:11.
Virgil, Eclogues, iv.39; see No. 56, ‘God’s Approbation of His Works’, I.4 and n.
every part of the earth will naturally produce whatever its inhabitants want—or all mankind will procure what the whole earth affords by a much easier and readier conveyance. For all the inhabitants of the earth, our Lord informs us, will then be ἰσάγγελοι,
Luke 20:36.
1313. But it seems a greater change will be wrought in the earth than even in the air and water. Not that I can believe that wonderful discovery of Jacob Behmen,
An English spelling of Jakob Boehme (1575-1624), the famous German theosophist, widely influential in England, espec. in the later works of William Law. Cf. No. 15, The Great Assize, III.3. and n.
Ibid.
AM orig., ‘and’, altered in Wesley’s errata and MS annotations.
Milton, Paradise Lost, iii.44.
1414. Let us next take a view of those changes which we may reasonably suppose will then take place in the earth. It will no more be bound up with intense cold, nor parched up with extreme heat; but will have such a temperature as will be most conducive to its fruitfulness. If in order to punish its inhabitants God did of old
Cf. Milton, Paradise Lost, x.668-71; cf. No. 56, ‘God’s Approbation of His Works’, I.6 and n.
thereby occasioning violent cold on one part, and violent heat on the other; he will undoubtedly then order them to restore it to its original position; so that there will be a final end, on the one hand of the burning heat which makes some parts of it scarce habitable; and on the other of
“The rage of Arctos, and eternal frost.Prior, Solomon, i.265; cf. No. 56, ‘God’s Approbation of His Works’, I.6 and n.
1515. And it will then contain no jarring or destructive principles within its own bosom. It will no more have any of those violent convulsions in its own bowels. It will no more be shaken or torn asunder by the impetuous force of earthquakes; and will therefore need neither Vesuvius nor Etna, nor any burning mountains
Cf. Thomas Burnet, Sacred Theory of the Earth , II.55 (a favourite of Wesley; cf. JWJ, Jan. 17, 1770), where among the features of the primal catastrophe are ‘burning mountains or volcanoes of the earth’. See Wesley’s echo of this in No. 15, The Great Assize, III.4 and n.
Orig., AM and SOSO , ‘unfruitful’, altered by Wesley in AM errata and his MS annotations to ‘unfaithful’.
Orig., AM and SOSO , ‘And’, but altered by Wesley in AM errata and MS annotations to ‘For’.
Milton, Paradise Lost, vi. 640-41. See No. 124, ‘Human Life a Dream’, §7.
02:508yet I cannot think gently rising hills will be any defect, but an ornament of the new-made earth. And doubtless we shall then likewise have occasion to say:
Cf. Watts, above, §9. Watts’s own text reads:
1616. And what will the general produce of the earth be? Not thorns, briars, or thistles. Not any useless or fetid weed; not any poisonous, hurtful, or unpleasant plant; but every one that can be conducive in any wise either to our use or pleasure. How far beyond all that the most lively imagination is now able to conceive! We shall no more regret the loss of the terrestrial paradise, or sigh at that well-devised description of our great poet;
Milton, Paradise Lost, xi.829-34.
For all the earth shall then be a more beautiful paradise than Adam ever saw.
>Cf. No. 59, ‘God’s Love to Fallen Man’, I.1 and n.
1717. Such will be the state of the new earth with regard to the meaner, the inanimate parts of it. But great as this change will be, it is little, it is nothing, in comparison of that which will then take place throughout all animated nature. In the living part of the creation were seen the most deplorable effects of Adam’s apostasy. The whole animated creation, whatever has life, from leviathan to the smallest mite, was thereby ‘made subject’ to such ‘vanity’
>Rom. 8:20.
Johnson, Dictionary , defines ‘fell’ as ‘cruel, barbarous, inhuman, savage, ravenous’. It occurs frequently in the literature of the time, referring to ‘war’ (as in Nicholas Rowe, Tamerlane , Act I, sc. 1; see No. 128, ‘The Deceitfulness of the Human Heart’, II.4), ‘anger’ and ‘destruction’ (cf. Beaumont and Fletcher, Bonduca , Act III, sc. 5), ‘revenge’ (Beattie, The Minstrel , II.xlvi.6), and even to ‘love’ (as in Spenser, Faerie Queene, Bk. II, Canto IV.xxxv.3).
>Cf. Wisd. 1:13. See also No. 60, ‘The General Deliverance’, I.5 and n.
>Cf. No. 56, ‘God’s Approbation of His Works’, I.12 and n.
>See Rev. 5:13; 6:16; 7:15.
Wesley adds ‘his’ only in the MS annotations to SOSO >.
>Ps. 145:9 (BCP).
Isa. 11:6.
>Cf. Isa. 11:9.
1818. But the most glorious of all will be the change which then 02:510will take place on the poor, sinful, miserable children of men. These had fallen in many respects, as from a greater height, so into a lower depth than any other part of the creation. But they shall ‘hear a great voice out of heaven, saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be their God.’ Hence will arise an unmixed state of holiness and happiness far superior to that which Adam enjoyed in paradise.
>Cf. No. 5, ‘Justification by Faith’, I.4 and n.
Rev. 21:3-4.
Cf. No. 55, On the Trinity, §17 and n.
For other summaries of Wesley’s eschatology, cf. No. 15, The Great Assize, intro., II.4, and n.
How to Cite This Entry
Bibliography:
, “.” In , edited by . , 2024. Entry published February 29, 2024. https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon064.About this Entry
Entry Title: Sermon 64: The New Creation