Notes:
Sermon 65: The Duty of Reproving our Neighbour
In this sermon we have an abrupt change of theme and climate. It was written in July 1787, but not published in the Arminian Magazine until the beginning of the following year (Vol. XI, January and February 1788) as number XLIII, and without a title. It was then promptly reprinted with its present title in SOSO (V.223-36). Note that it is the fifteenth sermon in a volume already advertised as planned for fourteen. This rather sudden shift in plans might account for the fact that it is not a logical sequel to ‘The New Creation’. It was not published again in Wesley’s lifetime.
Its theme is reminiscent of an older Puritan concern that in view of their rejection of traditional forms of confession, and also in light of their discovery that self-examination is not enough for life together in Christian fellowship. Christians should therefore serve as ‘consciences’ to each other. Wesley had before him the example of Richard Baxter, The Saints’ Everlasting Rest (1649/50), and even more specifically the sermon of John Kitchin on ‘How Must We Reprove That We May Not Partake of Other Men’s Sinnes’, which his grandfather, Samuel Annesley, had included in The Morning-Exercise at Cripplegate (1661); cf. Robert C. Monk, John Wesley: His Puritan Heritage, pp. 233-36. The only two recorded instances of Wesley’s use of Lev. 19:17 in his oral preaching occur in 1784 and 1787.
The Duty of Reproving our NeighbourLeviticus 19:17
Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thy heart: thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbour, and not suffer sin upon him.
A great part of the book of Exodus, and almost the whole of the book of Leviticus, relate to the ritual or ceremonial law of Moses, which was peculiarly given to the children of Israel; but was such 02:512‘a yoke’, says the apostle Peter, ‘as neither our fathers nor we were able to bear’.
Cf. Acts 15:10.
Gal. 5:1.
[Lev. 19,] ver. 10.
This phrase from Leviticus was present in AM, but omitted from SOSO.
Ver. 11.
Ver. 13.
Ver. 14.
Ver. 15.
Ver. 16.
In order to understand this important direction aright, and to apply it profitably to our own souls, let us consider,
First, what it is that we are to rebuke or reprove. What is the thing that is here enjoined? Secondly, who are they whom we are commanded to reprove? And, thirdly, how are we to reprove them?
11I. 1. Let us consider, first, What is the duty that is here enjoined? What is it we are to rebuke or reprove? And what is it ‘to reprove’? What is it to reprove? To tell anyone of his faults, as clearly appears from the following words, ‘Thou shalt not suffer sin upon him.’ Sin is therefore the thing we are called to reprove, or rather him that commits sin. We are to do all that in us lies to convince him of his fault, and lead him into the right way.
202:5132. Love indeed requires us to warn him, not only of sin (although of this chiefly), but likewise of any error which if it were persisted in would naturally lead to sin. If we do not hate him in our heart, if we love our neighbour as ourselves, this will be our constant endeavour—to warn him of every evil way and of every mistake which tends to evil.
33. But if we desire not to lose our labour,
See below, III.3. Cf. the anecdote in Boswell’s Life of Johnson (in 1772), ‘On School Chastisement’, recalled from Locke’s Treatise on Education (1693), about the mother who corrected her daughter for an eighth time because, said she, ‘I would have lost my labour if I had stopped at the seventh.’ A similar story is told of Samuel and Susanna Wesley and their eldest son. Samuel had asked his wife why she was repeating a lesson ‘to that dull child for the twentieth time’; Susanna’s reply: ‘Because the nineteenth would not have been enough.’ See George J. Stevenson, Memorials of the Wesley Family (London, 1876), p. 169; and Eliza Clarke, Susanna Wesley (1886), p. 28. The same theme reappears in Nos. 91, ‘On Charity’, III.8; 93, ‘On Redeeming the Time’, III.3; 95, ‘On the Education of Children’, §15; and 96, ‘On Obedience to Parents’, II.1. Cf. also Wesley’s letter to Philothea Briggs, Oct. 16, 1771.
See 1 Cor. 10:29.
Rom. 14:4.
1II. 1. Let us, in the second place, consider, Who are those that we are called to reprove? It is the more needful to consider this because it is affirmed by many serious persons that there are some sinners whom the Scripture itself forbids us to reprove. This sense has been put on that solemn caution of our Lord in his Sermon on the Mount: ‘Cast not your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under foot, and turn again and rend you.’
Cf. Matt. 7:6; see also the Notes on this verse.
Rom. 3:18.
22. The persons intended by ‘our neighbour’ are every child of man,
Cf. No. 7, ‘The Way to the Kingdom’, I.8 and n.
See 2 Sam. 4:11; Ezek. 3:18, 20; 33:6, 8.
33. How striking is Mr. Baxter’s reflection on this head, in his Saints’ Everlasting Rest: ‘Suppose thou wert to meet one in the lower world to whom thou hadst denied this office of love when ye were both together under the sun; what answer couldst thou make to his upbraiding? At such a time and place, while we were under the sun, God delivered me into thy hands. I then did not know the way of salvation, but was seeking death in the error of my life.
Cf. Wisd. 1:12; and No. 6, ‘The Righteousness of Faith’, §2 and n.
Matt. 3:7.
Cf. Baxter, The Saints’ Everlasting Rest, Pt. III, §7 in Works, III.226: ‘Consider, what a thing it will be to look upon your poor friends eternally in those flames, and to think that your neglect was a great cause of it! And that there was a time when you might have done much to prevent it! If you should there perish with them, it would be no small aggravation of your torment; if you be in heaven, it would sure be a sad thought, were it possible that any sorrow could dwell there, to hear a multitude of poor souls there to cry out for ever, Oh! if you would but have told me plainly of my sin and danger, and dealt roundly with me, and set it home, I might have escaped all this torment, and been now in rest. Oh! what a sad voice will this be!’
44. Everyone therefore that has a soul to be saved is entitled to this good office from thee. Yet this does not imply that it is to be done in the same degree to everyone. It cannot be denied that 02:515there are some to whom it is particularly due. Such, in the first place, are our parents, if we have any that stand in need of it; unless we should place our consorts and our children on an equal footing with them. Next to these we may rank our brothers and sisters, and afterwards our relations, as they are allied to us in a nearer or more distant manner, either by blood or by marriage. Immediately after these are our servants, whether bound to us for a term of years or any shorter term. Lastly, such in their several degrees are our countrymen, our fellow-citizens, and the members of the same society, whether civil or religious. The latter have a particular claim to our service; seeing these societies are formed with that very design, to watch over each other for this very end, that we may not suffer sin upon our brother.
An echo of the General Rules, §5: ‘…doing good…by instructing, reproving, or exhorting…’.
Cf. 1 John 3:15.
III. We have seen what is meant by reproving our brother, and who those are that we should reprove. But the principal thing remains to be considered. How, in what manner, are we to reprove them?
11. It must be allowed that there is a considerable difficulty in performing this in a right manner. Although at the same time it is far less difficult to some than it is to others. Some there are who are particularly qualified for it, whether by nature, or practice, or grace. They are not encumbered either with evil shame or that sore burden, the fear of man.
An echo of Francke’s Nicodemus: Or A Treatise Against the Fear of Man (1706); cf. No. 14, The Repentance of Believers, I.7 and n.
See 1 Pet. 2:21.
Cf. Deut. 33:25.
22. In what manner then shall we reprove our brother, in order that our reproof may be most effectual? Let us first of all take care that whatever we do may be done in the spirit of love;
Cf. No. 17, ‘The Circumcision of the Heart,’ I.2 and n.
See 1 Cor. 15:58.
33. Meantime the greatest care must be taken that you speak in the spirit of humility. Beware that you do not think of yourself more highly than you ought to think.
Rom. 12:3. See also, No. 21, ‘Sermon on the Mount, I,’ I.7 and n.
Cf. above, I.3 and n.
44. Great care must be taken, in the third place, to speak in the spirit of meekness,
Cf. No. 22, ‘Sermon on the Mount, II’, I.4 and n.
Cf. Jas. 1:20.
02:5175. But all this time see that you do not trust in yourself. Put no confidence in your own wisdom, or address, or abilities of any kind. For the success of all you speak or do, trust not in yourself, but in the great Author of every good and perfect gift.
Jas. 1:17.
1 Cor. 12:6.
66. So much for the spirit wherewith you should speak when you reprove your neighbour. I now proceed to the outward manner. It has been frequently found that the prefacing a reproof with a frank profession of goodwill has caused what was spoken to sink deep into the heart. This will generally have a far better effect than that grand fashionable engine, flattery,
Cf. No. 14, The Repentance of Believers, I.7 and n. for Wesley’s comments on the ‘praise of men’.
See 1 Cor. 14:25.
77. Although it is certain that the main point in reproving is to do it with a right spirit, yet it must also be allowed there are several little circumstances with regard to the outward manner which are by no means without their use, and therefore are not to be despised. One of these is—whenever you reprove, do it with great seriousness; so that as you really are in earnest you may likewise appear so to be. A ludicrous
I.e., ‘jesting’ or ‘sportive’; cf. Johnson, Dictionary.
Cf. Heb. 4:12.
88. Yet there are some exceptions to this general rule of 02:518reproving seriously. There are some exempt cases, wherein, as a good judge of human nature observes,
“Ridiculum acri fortiusCf. Horace, Satires, I.x.14-15: ‘Ridiculum acri/Fortius et melius magnas plerumque secat res.’ Compare this approving reference to Horace with Wesley’s more typical disapproval, as in No. 2, The Almost Christian, I.9 and n.
a little well-placed raillery will pierce deeper than solid argument. But this has place chiefly when we have to do with those who are strangers to religion. And when we condescend to give a ludicrous reproof to a person of this character it seems we are authorized so to do by that advice of Solomon, ‘Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own eyes.’
Cf. Prov. 26:5.
99. The manner of the reproof may in other respects too be varied according to the occasion. Sometimes you may find it proper to use many words to express your sense at large. At other times you may judge it more expedient to use few words; perhaps a single sentence. And at others it may be advisable to use no words at all, but a gesture, a sigh, or a look. Particularly when the person you would reprove is greatly your superior. And frequently this silent kind of reproof will be attended by the power of God, and consequently have a far better effect than a long and laboured discourse.
1010. Once more. Remember the remark of Solomon, ‘A word spoken in season, how good is it!’
Prov. 15:23.
2 Tim. 4:2.
Horace, Epistles, I.xiii. 3: ‘if he’s well, if he’s in good spirits, if—in fine—he asks for them’ (Loeb, 194:334-35). Addison quotes this in The Spectator, No. 553, Dec. 4, 1712.
when he is in a good humour, or when he asks it you. Here you may catch the
“mollia tempora fandiCf. Virgil, Aeneid, iv.293-94, ‘mollissima fandi / tempora’, ‘the happiest season for speech’ (Loeb, 1:414-15). See also Wesley’s letter to George Whitefield and his friends at Oxford, Sept. 10, 1736, and his Journal for the same date.
02:519the time when his mind is in a soft, mild frame. And then God will both teach you how to speak, and give a blessing to what is spoken.
1111. But here let me guard you against one mistake. It passes for an indisputable maxim, ‘Never attempt to reprove a man when he is intoxicated with drink.’
E.g., Pliny the Elder, Natural History, XXIII.i.23, ‘In proverbium cessit, sapientiam vino obumbrari’, ‘It has passed into a proverb that wisdom is clouded by wine;’ cf. ‘When the wine is in, the wit is out,’ ‘Wine counsels seldom prosper,’ and other apothegms in the same vein.
Cf. Wesley’s little tract under this title; see Bibliog, No. 111; Vol. 14 of this edn.
1212. I beseech you, brethren, by the mercies of God,
See Rom. 12:1.
See 2 Tim. 4:2.
See Zech. 3:2. Cf. No. 4, Scriptural Christianity, II.2 and n.
Orig., AM and SOSO, ‘not’, altered in Wesley’s MS annotations to each work.
Cf. Milton, Paradise Lost, i.335-36:
But they despair; they have no hope of escaping out of it. And they sink into it still deeper, because none else has any hope for them! ‘Sinners of every other sort’, said a venerable old clergyman, ‘have I frequently known converted to God. But an habitual drunkard I have never known converted.’ But I have known five hundred, perhaps five thousand. Ho! Art thou one, who readest these words? Then hear thou the words of the Lord! I have a message from God unto thee,
Judg. 3:20.
See Heb. 10:35.
See John 8:44.
John 1:29.
See Luke 19:9.
Cf. Matt. 9:2.
1313. Lastly, you that are diligent in this labour of love, see that you be not discouraged, although after you have used your best endeavours you should see no present fruit. You ‘have need of patience’, and then, ‘after ye have done the will of God’
Heb. 10:36.
Cf. Gal. 6:9.
Rom. 4:18.
Eccles. 11:1.
1414. I have now only a few words to add, unto you, my brethren, who are vulgarly called ‘Methodists’. I never heard or read of any considerable revival of religion which was not attended with a spirit of reproving. I believe it cannot be otherwise; for what is faith unless it worketh by love?
See Gal. 5:6; cf. No. 2, The Almost Christian, II.6 and n.
See No. 13, On Sin in Believers, intro., III.1-9, and n.
Cf. Rom. 5:1.
Cf. 1 Cor. 9:7.
Ps. 67:7 (BCP).
Manchester, July 28, 1787
How to Cite This Entry
Bibliography:
, “.” In , edited by . , 2024. Entry published February 29, 2024. https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon065.About this Entry
Entry Title: Sermon 65: The Duty of Reproving our Neighbour