Notes:
Sermon 66: The Signs of the Times
Since childhood Wesley had understood himself as having a providential vocation, and by the 1780s he was convinced that the Methodist Revival, with its parallels in Britain and America, was one of the landmark events in the whole of church history. He was, therefore, baffled (and offended?) by the steadfast indifference to it on the part of the leaders of the Church of England. The Revival had survived its days of violent persecution by local mobs and magistrates, but the day of recognition of its import for spiritual renewal in England and the world had not yet come—and might never. It was in something of this mood of complaint in the late summer of 1787, at St. Helier, Isle of Jersey, that he ‘finished [this present] sermon on Discerning the Signs of the Times’ (cf. JWJ, August 25, 1787). It is one of the rare examples of the cult-hero taking himself seriously as such, with an elaborate parallelism between the blindness of the Pharisees and Sadducees to ‘the signs of their times’ and equivalent myopias in his own day. It is clear, however, that the main point to the sermon is its concluding appeal to the Methodists that they not fail in their discernment of the signs of their times, but respond appropriately.
This was, apparently, the only time he ever preached from this particular text (Matt. 16:3); the sermon was published in the Arminian Magazine the following year in the March and April issues without title (Vol. XI. 115-20, 172-78), and then immediately, with its present title, as the concluding item in SOSO, V.237-52, the sixteenth in a work advertised for fourteen parts). Like ‘The Duty of Reproving our Neighbour’, it seems to have been placed here to fill out a volume rather than as a link in Wesley’s programme as advertised in the preface to SOSO, V-VII.
See above, pp. 455-57.
Matthew 16:3
Ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times?
11. The entire passage runs thus: ‘The Pharisees also, with the Sadducees, came, and tempting, desired him that he would show them a sign from heaven. He answered and said, When it is evening, ye say, It will be fair weather, for the sky is red; and in the morning, It will be foul weather today, for the sky is red and lowering. O ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times?’
22. ‘The Pharisees also, with the Sadducees, came.’ In general these were quite opposite to each other; but it is no uncommon thing for the children of the world to lay aside their opposition to each other (at least for a season) and cordially to unite in opposing the children of God. ‘And tempting’, that is, making a trial whether he was indeed sent of God, ‘desired him that he would show them a sign from heaven’, which they believed no false prophet was able to do. It is not improbable they imagined this would convince them that he was really sent from God. ‘He answered and said unto them, When it is evening, ye say, It will be fair weather, for the sky is red; and in the morning, It will be foul weather today, for the sky is red and lowering.’ Probably there were more certain signs of fair and foul weather in their climate than there are in ours. ‘O ye hypocrites’, making profession of love while you have enmity in your hearts; ‘ye can discern the face of the sky,’ and judge thereby what the weather will be; ‘but can ye not discern the signs of the times,’ when God brings his first-begotten Son into the world?
33. Let us more particularly inquire, first, What were ‘the times’ whereof our Lord speaks? And what were ‘the signs’ whereby those times were to be distinguished from all others? We may then inquire, secondly, what are ‘the times’ which we have reason to believe are now at hand? And how is it that all who are called Christians do not discern ‘the signs of these times’?
1102:523I. 1. Let us in the first place inquire, What times were those concerning which our Lord is here speaking? It is easy to answer: the times of the Messiah, the times ordained before the foundation of the world wherein it pleased God to give his only-begotten Son
See John 3:16.
Cf. Phil. 2:8.
Cf. John 3:16.
22. But what were those signs of the coming of that Just One
See Acts 7:52.
Gen. 49:10.
The Hebrew text here is notoriously obscure. Modern commentators tend to reject the translation, ‘Shiloh’, whether as a place or Messianic metaphor; cf. E. A. Speiser, Genesis, The Anchor Bible (1964). But Wesley is right about the traditions of rabbinical interpretation up to his day; cf. Menahem M. Kasher, Encyclopedia of Biblical Interpretation, Vol. VI: Genesis (New York, American Encyclopedia Society, 1965), p. 169, §§75-77: ‘…until Shiloh—i.e., the royal Messiah—comes…’. See also Abraham Ben-Isaiah and Benjamin Sharfinan, The Pentateuch and Rashi’s Commentary (Brooklyn, S. S. and R. Publishing Company, 1949-50), I.489: ‘I.e., Messiah, the King, for the Kingdom is his, and thus does Onkelos render it.’ Abraham Cohen confirms this in his Soncino Chumash…An Exposition Based on the Classical Jewish Commentaries (London, Soncino Press, 1956). John Skinner, in his Genesis (1910) in the International Critical Commentary, had realized this: ‘the Messianic acceptation of this passage prevailed in Jewish circles from the earliest times.’
33. A second eminent sign of those times, the times of the coming of the
Messiah, is given us in the third chapter of the prophecy of Malachi: ‘Behold, I
send my messenger, and he shall prepare my way before me; and the Lord whom ye
seek shall suddenly come to his temple.’
Ver. 1. Chap. 40, ver.
3.
44. But yet clearer signs than these (if any could be clearer) were the mighty works that he wrought. Accordingly he himself declares, ‘The works which I do, they testify of me.’
Cf. John 5:36 (Notes).
Luke 7:19, 20; cf. Henry, Exposition, for a comment on the basis for John’s implied doubts here.
Matt. 11:4-5.
55. But how then came it to pass that those who were so sharp-sighted in other things, who could ‘discern the face of the sky’, were not able to discern those signs which indicated the coming of the Messiah? They could not discern them, not for want of evidence—this was full and clear—but for want of integrity in themselves; because they were a ‘wicked and adulterous generation’;
Matt. 16:4.
Mal. 4:2.
See 1 Thess. 2:16.
1II. 1. We are in the second place to consider, What are ‘the times’ which we have reason to believe are now at hand? And how is it that all who are called Christians do not discern ‘the signs of these times’?
‘The times’ which we have reason to believe are at hand (if they are not already begun) are what many pious men have termed the time of ‘the latter-day glory’;
Cf. Jer. 49:39; Hag. 2:9.
Cf. Isa. 11:9; Hab. 2:14.
22. ‘But are there in England, or in any part of the world, any signs of such a time approaching?’ It is not many years since that a person of considerable learning, as well as eminence in the Church (then Bishop of London), in his pastoral letter made this observation: ‘I cannot imagine what persons mean by talking of “a great work of God” at this time. I do not see any work of God now, more than has been at any other time.’
A blurred memory of Bishop Edmund Gibson’s general disapproval of the early Methodists; cf. CWJ, Oct. 21, 1738 (the date is in error; the meeting between John and Charles and the bishop took place on Friday, Oct. 20), and John’s diary for Oct. 20—he does not mention the event in his Journal. Cf. also CWJ, Feb. 21, 1739; see also John’s diary, Saturday, Mar. 24, 1739, and his reply to the bishop’s ‘Charge to the Clergy’, June 11, 1747, in which the bishop had attacked Wesley, the Moravians, and Whitefield; Gibson’s Pastoral Letter to the People of His Diocese…by way of Caution against Lukewarmness on the one Hand and Enthusiasm on the other (1739, 55pp.), and three other of Gibson’s ‘pastoral letters’. Wesley’s alleged quotation does not appear, verbatim, in any of them. Yet is a clear inference from Gibson’s letters that he did not regard the Methodist Revival as an especially ‘great work of God’, and rejected their claims (Whitefield’s in particular) to ‘a special and immediate mission from God’, etc. (cf. pp. 27-41). It was this inference that Wesley felt free to place here in quotation marks.
Another of Gibson’s pamphlets that comes nearer to Wesley’s mark appeared in 1744, Observations Upon the Conduct and Behaviour of a Certain Sect Usually Distinguished by the Name of Methodists (folio and quarto), Pt. III, Q. 3, 1, ‘Imagination of some great work of which God makes them the instruments’; pp. 22-23: ‘Whether…their astonishment that God should make such “poor mean” creatures as they are his instruments in an extraordinary work which he is bringing about upon the earth is not a means to keep up an opinion in their hearers that all they do and say is directed and dictated immediately by God…’. For Wesley’s reply, see his Farther Appeal, Pt. I, III.2-9 (11:119-30 in this edn.). See also No. 112, On Laying the Foundation of the New Chapel, §2. For other references to Bishop Gibson, cf. II.10, below; and No. 68, ‘The Wisdom of God’s Counsels’, §21.
33. We allow indeed that in every age of the Church, ‘the kingdom of God came not with observation;’
Cf. Luke 17:20.
Cf. Luke 17:21.
Matt. 13:31-32.
Cf. Matt. 13:33.
44. But may it not be asked, Are there now any signs that the day of God’s power is approaching? I appeal to every candid, unprejudiced person, whether we may not at this day discern all those signs (understanding the words in a spiritual sense) to which our Lord referred to John’s disciples. ‘The blind receive their sight.’
Matt. 11:5.
2 Cor. 4:6.
Cf. Luke 24:45; Eph. 1:18.
Matt. 11:5.
Ibid.
See Heb. 12:1.
Matt 11:5.
Ibid.
See Gal. 5:6.
Rom. 14:17.
An interesting ambiguity here. This sermon was written on the Isle of Jersey, and Wesley may have had in mind the Channel Islands, the Isle of Wight, the Isle of Man, etc., since the revival had spread to all of them in the period, 1753-83. But the reference to America also suggests the American West Indies, where Nathaniel Gilbert had pioneered in 1760 and where Thomas Coke had carried the work forward in 1786.
In Wesley’s personal copy of AM, this phrase, ‘yea, by myriads’, has been crossed out—another instance, one supposes, of Wesley’s instinct for compression.
55. But how may this be accounted for? How is it that they cannot discern the signs of these times? We may account for their want of discernment on the same principle we accounted for that of the Pharisees and Sadducees; namely, that they likewise were what those were, an ‘adulterous and sinful generation’.
Mark 8:38.
See Matt. 6:22. Cf. No. 31, ‘Sermon on the Mount, XI’, III.4 and n.
See Matt. 6:23. Cf. No. 125, ‘On a Single Eye’, on this text.
See Rom. 12:3.
Cf. John 5:44.
See 1 Pet. 3:9.
See Rom. 12:21.
Matt. 5:38.
Cf. Mark 8:33.
See Col. 3:2.
Cf. Rom. 1:25.
2 Tim. 3:4.
See 2 Cor. 4:4.
This may be a garbled echo from Law’s Spirit of Prayer (Works, VII.76); cf. Wesley’s long ‘open letter’ to Law, Jan. 6, 1756: ‘That angels have bodies you affirm elsewhere. But are you sure they have flesh and blood? Are not angels spirits? And surely a spirit hath not flesh and blood.’ Cf. No. 124, ‘Human Life a Dream’, §7, where Wesley speaks of ‘eyes of flesh and blood’ and where the term, ‘eyes’, connotes the immaterial self.
66. St. John assigns this very reason for the Jews not understanding the things of God, namely, that in consequence of their preceding sins and wilful
Actually an adverbial usage, as in Shakespeare’s Winter’s Tale, I. ii. 255: ‘If ever I were wilful negligent’.
In both published texts this passage reads: ‘therefore they do not believe because that Isaiah said (that is, because of the reason given in that saying of Isaiah)’. This is obviously awkward; one may suppose that the proofreader failed to realize that the parenthesis was actually an emendation and not an addition.
John 12:40, alluding to Isa. 6:10.
77. And as it was with them in ancient times, so it is with the present generation. Thousands of those who bear the name of Christ are now given up to an undiscerning mind. The god of this world hath so blinded their eyes that the light cannot shine upon them,
See 2 Cor. 4:4.
Cf. Rev. 21:2, 10.
Bishop Thomas Newton. See No. 61, ‘The Mystery of Iniquity’, §27 and n.
In JWJ, Jan. 30, 1756, Wesley had voiced his doubt that Peter the Great was a Christian: ‘Undoubtedly, he was a soldier, a general, and a statesman scarce inferior to any. But why was he called a Christian? What has Christianity to do either with deep dissimulation or savage cruelty?’ The probable source of Wesley’s main knowledge of Peter the Great was Alexander Gordon’s two-volume History of Peter the Great (1755), together with John Banks’s History of the Life and Reign of…Peter the Great (1740), both of which Wesley had read. Peter had been a favourite subject for English biographers in the eighteenth century. Daniel Defoe in 1723 and John Mottley in 1739 had also published histories of his life.
See Rev. 9:11; 20:1. Cf. also No. 32, ‘Sermon on the Mount, XII’, I.7 and n.
For other references to the church as a ‘mixed society’, see No. 104, ‘On Attending the Church Service’, §13 and n.
88. By the same rule, what signs would this writer have expected of the approaching conversion of the heathens? He would doubtless have expected a hero, like Charles of Sweden,
Charles XII (1682-1718), one of Sweden’s great warrior heroes, whose untimely death at Frederickshall is cited by way of illustration in No. 124, ‘Human Life a Dream’, §9.
Frederick II (‘the Great’) of Prussia (1712-86), whose ‘infernal subtlety’ (despite his genius) had lately been commented on by Wesley in JWJ, Aug. 26, 1784; see also Dec. 10, 1787, and May 7, 1789.
Luke 17:20.
Isa. 9:6.
See Matt. 13:31-32.
Cf. 1 Cor. 5:6; Gal. 5:9; also Matt. 13:33.
See Gal. 5:6. Cf. No. 2, The Almost Christian, II.6 and n.
99. In the same manner it continues to spread at the present time also, as may easily appear to all those whose eyes are not blinded. All those that experience in their own hearts the power of God unto salvation
Rom. 1:16.
Cf. No. 15, The Great Assize, II.10 and n.
Acts 16:30.
Cf. Luke 1:46-47.
See Acts 10:35.
See Gal. 6:10. Notice, however, that Wesley has softened the Pauline ‘as we have therefore opportunity’ to ‘as they have time’—a considerable difference.
1010. What excuse then have any that believe the Scriptures to be the Word of God for not discerning the signs of these times, as preparatory to the general call of the heathens? What could God have done which he hath not done
See Isa. 5:4; see also No. 107, ‘On God’s Vineyard’, on this text.
Num. 23:23, the text of Wesley’s sermon (No. 112) on laying the foundation stone for the New Chapel, City Road, London, Apr. 21, 1777.
Cf. Isa. 66:8.
Cf. Zech. 4:6.
Another blurred memory. What Gibson had asked in his Observations (see above, II.2) is as follows: ‘Whether it does not savour of self-sufficiency and presumption, when a few young heads, without any colour of a divine commission, set up their own schemes as the great standard of Christianity. And, how it can be reconciled to Christian humility, prudence, or charity, to indulge their own notions to such a degree as to perplex, unhinge, terrify, and distract the minds of multitudes of people, who have lived from their infancy under a gospel ministry, and in the regular exercise of a gospel worship; and all this, by persuading them that they have never yet heard the true Gospel, nor been instructed in the true way of salvation before; and that they neither are, nor can be true Christians, but by adhering to their doctrines and discipline, and embracing Christianity upon their schemes: All the while, for the sake of those schemes and in pursuance of them, violating the wholesome rules, which the powers spiritual and temporal have wisely and piously established, for the preservation of peace and order in the church.’ Cf. No. 68, ‘The Wisdom of God’s Counsels’, §21, where Wesley quotes Gibson more accurately. See Wesley’s other account of the revival in A Short History of the People Called Methodists, §54, where he speaks of ‘a handful of raw young men’. The added term ‘raw’ may have lodged in Wesley’s memory from Robert South’s contemptuous reference to the Commonwealth preachers as ‘raw, unlearned, ill-bred persons’; cf. South, Sermons (1844), I.111.
Ezek. 26:9.
See Josh. 6:5.
Cf. John 6:30.
1111. Meantime, ‘Blessed are your eyes, for they see. […] Many prophets and righteous men have desired to see the things you see, and have not seen them, and to hear the things that you hear, and have not heard them.’
Cf. Matt. 13:16-17.
Cf. Ps. 118:24.
1212. The first point is—see that you yourselves receive not the blessing of God in vain. Begin at the root, if you have not already. Now repent and believe the gospel.
Mark 1:15.
Cf. 2 John 8.
Cf. 2 Tim. 1:6.
1 John 1:7.
Heb. 3:6, etc.
Cf. Phil. 3:12, 16; 1 Tim. 4:6.
Heb. 6:1.
1 John 4:18.
Cf. Phil. 3:13-14.
1313. It behoves you in the next place to help your neighbours. ‘Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.’
Matt. 5:16.
See Gal. 6:10; and n. 65, above.
See 2 Tim. 1:12.
Matt. 5:13.
Cf. Matt. 5:14.
Cf. Matt. 5:14-15.
See Rom. 12:12.
St. Helier, Isle of Jersey, Aug. 27, 1787
The place and date appear only in AM (1788), XI.178, with the spelling, ‘St. Helliers’.
How to Cite This Entry
Bibliography:
, “.” In , edited by . , 2024. Entry published February 29, 2024. https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon066.About this Entry
Entry Title: Sermon 66: The Signs of the Times