Notes:
Sermon 68: The Wisdom of God’s Counsels
The Journal for April 1784 recounts Wesley’s journeyings from London to Scotland by way of Chester, Liverpool, Manchester, Stockport, Carlisle. He was in Edinburgh on the 25th. The report also manages to reflect Wesley’s mixed feelings about the uneven progress of the Revival, his alarm over various signs of weakened discipline within the Methodist ranks; cf. JWJ, April 5: ‘We are labouring to secure the [Methodist] preaching-houses to the next generation! In the name of God, let us, if possible, secure the present generation from drawing back to perdition’ (one of his favourite clichés in such warnings). There is no record in Journal or the diary of his writing a sermon during this period but, according to his entry in the Arminian Magazine for August 1784 (VII.410), he finished one on Rom. 9:33 in Glasgow on April 28. It was a text from which he had not preached before, as far as our records go.
As already in ‘The Mystery of Iniquity’ (see No. 61), he is here concerned with the vagaries of revivals as instruments of God’s providence; this may account for this sermon’s place in Wesley’s revised order of SOSO, VI—after ‘On Divine Providence’. There is an asymmetry in its rhetorical form; its proem (§§1-7) takes a very broad view of God’s wisdom at work in creation and history. Thereafter, the sermon descends quickly into a series of comments on the uneven course of church history in general, ‘the deceitfulness of riches’ (especially in the case of the Methodists), and the waning of their religious zeal. It was first published without a title in the Arminian Magazine for July and August (VII.346-52, 402-10); its present title was added in the collection of 1788 (VI.29-52). It was not published again in Wesley’s lifetime, although he does mention preaching from Rom. 9:33 again on January 11, 1789.
02:552 The Wisdom of God’s CounselsRomans 11:33
O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God.
11. Some apprehend the ‘wisdom’ and the ‘knowledge’ of God to mean one and the same thing. Others believe that the wisdom of God more directly refers to his appointing the ends of all things, and his knowledge to the means which he hath prepared and made conducive to those ends. The former seems to be the most natural explication; as the wisdom of God in its most extensive meaning must include the one as well as the other, the means as well as the ends.
22. Now the wisdom, as well as the power of God, is abundantly manifested in his creation, in the formation and arrangement of all his works, in heaven above and in the earth beneath; and in adapting them all to the several ends for which they were designed; insomuch that each of them apart from the rest is good, but all together are very good;
Gen. 1:31.
Cf. No. 56, ‘God’s Approbation of His Works’, I.14 and n.
33. As this wisdom appears even to short-sighted men (and much more to spirits of a higher order) in the creation and disposition of the whole universe, and every part of it, so it equally appears in their preservation, in his ‘upholding all things by the word of his power’.
Heb. 1:3.
Cf. No. 56, ‘God’s Approbation of His Works’, I.10 and n.
Young, The Last Day, ii.221.
Cf. Eccles. 3:11.
Cf. Ps. 148:8 (BCP).
Cf. Ps. 8:1, 9 (BCP).
44. Equally conspicuous is the wisdom of God in the government of nations, of states and kingdoms; yea, rather more conspicuous—if infinite can be allowed to admit of any degrees. For the whole inanimate creation, being totally passive and inert,
Cf. No. 15, The Great Assize, III.3 and n.
See above, No. 63, ‘The General Spread of the Gospel’, §12 and n.
55. But the riches both of the wisdom and the knowledge of God
See Rom. 11:33.
See Matt. 13:31-32.
Eph. 3:10. Cf. below, §24.
1 Pet. 1:12.
Rom. 11:33.
Ibid.
Cf. Ps. 77:19.
66. But a little of this he has been pleased to reveal unto us. And by keeping close to what he has revealed, meantime comparing the word and the work of God together, we may understand a part of his ways. We may in some measure trace this manifold wisdom from the beginning of the world: from Adam to Noah, from Noah to Moses, and from Moses to Christ. But I would now consider it (after just touching on the history of the church in past ages) only with regard to what he has wrought in the present age, during the last half century; yea, and in this little corner of the world, the British islands only.
Note how this swift passage from a universal perspective to a quite personal focus is paralleled in No. 107, ‘On God’s Vineyard’, proem; and No. 63, ‘The General Spread of the Gospel’.
77. In the fullness of time, just when it seemed best to his infinite wisdom, God brought his first-begotten into the world. He then laid the foundation of his church, though it hardly appeared till the day of Pentecost. And it was then a glorious church; all the members thereof being ‘filled with the Holy Ghost’,
Acts 2:4, etc.
Cf. Acts 4:32.
Cf. Acts 2:42.
Cf. Acts 2:44; 4:32.
Charles Wesley, ‘Primitive Christianity’, Hymns and Sacred Poems (1749), II.333 (Poet. Wks., V.480); John has conflated the opening couplet of st. 2 and the closing couplet of st. 6. See No. 63, ‘The General Spread of the Gospel’, §20 and n.
02:5558. But their happy state did not continue long. See Ananias and Sapphira,
Acts 5:1-11.
Cf. 1 Tim. 6:10. See intro., No 50, ‘The Use of Money’. Note espec. that here Wesley is saying that the first fall of the church came before Constantine, but see No. 61, ‘The Mystery of Iniquity’, §27 and n., for Wesley’s more typical view that ‘the fall’ came with Constantine.
Cf. No. 57, ‘On the Fall of Man’, II.3 and n.
Jackson’s 3rd edn., possibly based on Wesley’s annotated Vol. VI of SOSO, since lost, which has ‘those of Smyrna and Philadelphia’.
99. Nevertheless it is certain that the gates of hell did never totally prevail against it.
Cf. Matt. 16:18.
Cf. John 4:24.
See Rom. 14:16.
Traditionalist though he was, Wesley was also critical of traditional condemnations of those he recognized as kindred spirits in one degree or another. Montanus was a Phrygian charismatic of the second century who had professed to be called, under the direct guidance of the Holy Spirit, to restore the church to its primitive spirituality—thus, the prototype of many later enthusiasts. Cf. No. 61, ‘The Mystery of Iniquity’, §24 and n.
I.e., Pelagius (c. 355-420), a fellow Briton who may or may not have been a ‘Pelagian’ in the sense in which he was so fiercely condemned by Augustine, Pope Zosimus, et al.; cf. Evans, Pelagius. Wesley’s plaudits here overlook the crucial distinction that, for Pelagius, prevenience is not emphasized, whereas for Wesley the Spirit’s initiative is the dynamic essence of all grace. Cf. his letter to John Fletcher, Aug. 18, 1775, as well as an earlier letter to Alexander Coates, July 7, 1761.
Cf. Fox’s broadsheet of 1660(?), For Your Whoredoms in the City of London is the Hand of the Lord Stretched Forth Against Thee…: ‘Whores and Whoremongers, …you stink before the Lord…the noisome smell of your flesh stinks…’. See also, Fox’s The Great Mystery of the Great Whore Unfolded and Antichrist’s Kingdom Revealed Unto Destruction (1659). Cf. No. 48, ‘Self-denial’, I.1. For another reference to Fox, cf. No. 61, ‘The Mystery of Iniquity’, §30.
Heb. 6:1.
Gal. 6:2.
‘But St. Augustine says’—When St. Augustine’s passions were heated his word is not worth a rush. And here is the secret. St. Augustine was angry at Pelagius. Hence he slandered and abused him (as his manner was) without either fear or shame. And St. Augustine was then in the Christian world what Aristotle was afterwards. There needed no other proof of any assertion than ipse dixit—‘St. Augustine said it.’
1010. But to return. When iniquity had overspread the church as a flood, the Spirit of the Lord lifted up a standard against it. He raised up a poor monk, without wealth, without power, and at that time without friends, to declare war, as it were, against all the world; against the Bishop of Rome and all his adherents. But this little stone, being chosen of God, soon grew into a great mountain; and increased more and more till it had covered a considerable part of Europe. Yet even before Luther was called home the love of many was waxed cold.
See Matt. 24:12.
1 Tim. 1:19.
Luther suffered from ‘the stone’ (i.e., renal calculus); cf. Table Talk, Nos. 3522, 3733, 5047, etc., but he died of a heart attack, as Samuel Clarke had already reported in his Marrow of Ecclesiastical Historie (1650), p. 93. Cf. J. G. Walch, Dr. Martin Luthers Sämtliche Schriften (1740), XXI.277 ff.; and E. G. Schwiebert, Luther and His Times (St. Louis, Concordia Publishing House, 1950), pp. 747-50. Wesley had found the story of Luther’s dying lament in J. D. Herrnschmid, Life of Martin Luther (1742), X.10, extracts of which had been published in AM (1778, see espec. I.272). For Herrnschmid’s quotation (uncited), see An Earnest Exhortation… (1522) [Weimar edn, 8:685]; this had no relation to Luther’s dying words. See also No. 102, ‘Of Former Times’, §14; and for Wesley’s other references to Luther, see No. 14, The Repentance of Believers, I.9 and n.
1111. About the same time it pleased God to visit Great Britain. A few in the reign of King Henry VIII, and many more in the three following reigns, were real witnesses of true scriptural Christianity. The number of these exceedingly increased in the beginning of the following century. And in the year 1627 there was a wonderful pouring out of the Spirit in several parts of England, as well as in Scotland and the north of Ireland.
Cf. Gillies, Historical Collections. It is interesting that this outpouring is not mentioned in the standard church historical surveys (e.g., Mosheim, Gee and Hardy, Williston Walker, etc.). But it must have been what Wesley regarded as the flowering of the Puritan movement and the forerunner of the charismatic renewals later seen amongst the Quakers and other ‘spirituals’.
Cf. The Works of John Owen (1842), VI, ‘Of Temptation’, p. 112: ‘We [Puritans] have by Providence shifted places with the men of the world, we have by sin shifted spirits with them also…we are cast into the mould of them that went before us…’.
1202:55812. What little religion was left in the land received another deadly wound at the Restoration, by one of the worst princes that ever sat on the English throne,
I.e., Charles II (1660-85). Gilbert Burnet, History of His Own Times (1724), I.611, says, ‘And finding it not easy to reward [his friends] as they deserved, he forgot them all alike…. This was an equal return…. He never troubled his thoughts with the sense of any of the services that had been done him.’ Richard Steele, writing in The Spectator, No. 462 (1712), has a kinder assessment: ‘He pursued pleasure more than ambition, but was a good king, loved by his subjects.’ Cf. Sir George Clark, The Later Stuarts, 1660-1714, Vol. 10, in Oxford History of England (1955), especially the French Ambassador, Pomponne’s, comment on ‘this perpetually agitated state of England’, p. 109. See also No. 79, ‘On Dissipation’, §1.
Such as her fund for the poorer clergy (‘Queen Anne’s Bounty’, 1704, et seq.) and her attempts to counter the Whig and Latitudinarian monopolies in the episcopacy.
Cf. Wesley’s references to 1725 as the year of his first conversion, as in his recollection in A Plain Account of Christian Perfection (1766): ‘In the year 1725 [in reading ‘several parts of’ Jeremy Taylor’s Holy Living and Holy Dying]…I was exceedingly affected—that part in particular which relates to purity of intention. Instantly I resolved to dedicate all my life to God, all my thoughts, and words, and actions: being throughly convinced, there was no medium; but that every part of my life (not some only) must either be a sacrifice to God or to myself, that is, in effect, to the devil.’
The 1st edn. of Christian Perfection bears the date 1726; Serious Call is dated 1729. See Wesley’s remembrance of his experience of these in JWJ, May 24, 1738, §5: ‘The light flowed in so mightily upon my soul that everything appeared in a new view…. I was persuaded that I should be accepted of him and that I was even then [1729?] in a state of salvation.’
Cf. Gillies, Historical Collections, and Joseph Milner, History of the Church of Christ…. Cf. also John Walsh, ‘Methodism at the End of the Eighteenth Century’, in A History of the Methodist Church in Great Britain, I.275-315.
1313. But what means did the wisdom of God make use of in effecting this great work? He thrust out such labourers into his harvest as the wisdom of man would never have thought on. He chose the weak things to confound the strong, and the foolish things to confound the wise.
See 1 Cor. 1:17.
See Acts 20:24. Cf. No. 66, ‘The Signs of the Times’, II.10 and n.
1 Pet. 2:9.
Titus 2:14.
1414. But as these young preachers grew in years they did not all grow in grace. Several of them indeed increased in other knowledge; but not proportionally in the knowledge of God. They grew less simple, less alive to God, and less devoted to him. They were less zealous for God, and consequently less active, less diligent in his service. Some of them began to desire the praise of men and not the praise of God only;
See John 12:43.
Cf. 2 Tim. 2:3.
See 1 Cor. 2:4.
2 Tim. 4:2.
Cf. Col. 1:28.
Cf. 1 Cor. 9:22.
1515. And as some preachers ‘declined from their first love’,
Cf. Rev. 2:4.
Cf. Rom. 8:37.
Cf. Mark 14:38.
1 Tim. 1:19.
Cf. Mark 4:19.
16 16. But of all temptations none so struck at the whole work of God as ‘the deceitfulness of riches’
Matt. 13:22; Mark 4:19.
An increasingly insistent theme of Wesley’s last two decades; for this consistent definition of riches, see No. 30, ‘Sermon on the Mount, X’, §26 and n. Cf. also intro. to No. 50, ‘The Use of Money’.
Cf. 1 Tim. 6:9.
Gal. 5:16; 1 John 2:16. Cf. No. 7, ‘The Way to the Kingdom’, II.2 and n.
Law, Christian Perfection (Works, III.38); cf. No. 50, ‘The Use of Money’, II.2 and n.
Phil. 3:19.
1 John 2:16; cf. n. 64 above.
Cf. Addison, who wrote at least nine essays for The Spectator on ‘The Pleasures of the Imagination’; cf. No. 44, Original Sin, II.10 and n.
1 John 2:16.
Cf. Matt. 6:19, 20. Cf. intro. to No. 28, ‘Sermon on the Mount, VIII’.
A reprise of Wesley’s three ‘rules’ for ‘the use of money’; see No. 50, ‘The Use of Money’, I.1 and n.
See Ps. 119:25.
John 12:43.
1 John 2:15.
1702:56217. And perhaps there is something more than all this contained in those words, ‘Love not the world, neither the things of the world.’
Ibid.
Cf. Jas. 4:4.
Cf. Ps. 109:18 (AV); cf. ver. 17 (BCP).
1818. But all rich men are under a continual temptation to acquaintance and conversation with worldly men. They are likewise under a continual temptation to pride, to think more highly of themselves than they ought to think.
See Rom. 12:3.
1 Thess. 5:15.
See Matt. 16:24, etc.
Once more therefore I say, having gained and saved all you can, give all you can; else your money will eat your flesh as fire, and will sink you to the nethermost hell!
O beware of ‘laying up treasures upon earth’! Is it not treasuring up wrath against the day of wrath?
Lord! I have warned them; but if they will not be warned, what can I do more? I can only ‘give them up unto their own heart’s lusts, and let them follow their own imaginations’!
Cf. Ps. 81:13 (BCP); note this rare instance of the directly personal appeal of Wesley’s oral preaching carried over into his written style.
1919. By not taking this warning it is certain many of the Methodists are already fallen. Many are falling at this very time. And there is great reason to apprehend that many more will fall, most of whom will rise no more!
But what method may it be hoped the all-wise God will take to repair the decay of his work? If he does not remove the candlestick
See Rev. 2:5.
Cf. Rev. 2:4.
A young preacher who had been in the thick of the Cornish anti-Methodist persecutions in 1744; in 1745 he was named as one of the ‘Assistants’ or supervising preachers, but died from smallpox not long afterwards (JWJ, Sept. 16, 1744; AM [1778], I.230-31; MS Minutes, 1745).
Edward Dunstone (or Dunstan) died Jan. 6, 1748/9, and Charles Wesley read an edifying account of his death to the London societies. In a letter to his betrothed that month he speaks of Dunstone as ‘the extraordinary youth you heard of (Charles Wesley, MS letter to Sally Gwynne [Jan. 23, 1749], MA).
John Manners (1731-63), converted 1755, served as an itinerant preacher both in Ireland and the north of England; he died in York (Charles Atmore, The Methodist Memorial; being an Impartial Sketch of the Lives and Characters of the Preachers [Bristol, Edwards, 1801], pp. 247-50; Thomas Jackson, Lives of Early Methodist Preachers, II.112, IV.24, 26, 76; C. H. Crookshank, History of Methodism in Ireland, I.152; MS Minutes, 1758).
Thomas Walsh (c. 1730-59), a converted Irish Roman Catholic who became a saintly preacher and a fine Hebrew scholar. In a letter to Dean William Digby, written in the early 1780s, Wesley would say of him that he was ‘the best Hebraean I ever knew’. Wesley wrote a foreword for James Morgan’s biography of Walsh, 1762, and included an abridgement of it in his own Works (1772), XI.129-36, XII. 3-26 (see Bibliog, No. 252).
See 2 Cor. 12:15.
2020. Hear ye this, all ye preachers who have not the same life, the same communion with God, the same zeal for his cause, the same burning love to souls, that you had once! ‘Take heed unto yourselves, that ye lose not the things ye have wrought, but that ye receive a full reward.’
Cf. 2 John 8.
Acts 14:3; 20:32.
Cf. Matt. 3:9.
Cf. Rev. 2:5.
2121. Would it not provoke the Lord of the harvest to lay you altogether aside if you despised the labourers he had raised up, merely because of their youth? This was commonly done to us when we were first sent out between forty and fifty years ago. Old, wise men asked, ‘What will these young heads do?’ So the then 02:565Bishop of London in particular.
Edmund Gibson, Observations…; see No. 66, ‘The Signs of the Times’, II.10 and n.
Cf. Job 12:2.
See Ps. 50:22 (BCP).
2222. Let us next consider, What method has the wisdom of God taken for these five and forty years, when thousands of the people that once ran well, one after another ‘drew back to perdition’?
Cf. Heb. 10:39.
1 Tim. 6:9.
See Rom. 6:11.
2323. And, blessed be God, we see he is now doing the same thing in various parts of the kingdom. In the room of those that have fallen from their steadfastness, or are falling at this day, he is continually raising up out of the stones other children to Abraham. This he does at one or another place according to his own will; pouring out his quickening Spirit on this or another people just as it pleaseth him. He is raising up those of every age and degree—young men and maidens, old men and children
See Ps. 148:12.
Cf. 1 Pet. 2:9.
Cf. Isa. 11:9; Hab. 2:14.
Cf. Rom. 11:26, 25.
2402:56624. But have all those that have sunk under manifold temptations
See 1 Pet. 1:6; and No. 47, ‘Heaviness through Manifold Temptations’; on this text.
Cf. Ps. 77:7-8 (AV and BCP conflated).
See Jer. 3:22.
Hos. 11:9.
Cf. Lam. 3:22.
Cf. Isa. 55:7.
Meantime, thus saith the Lord to you that now supply their place, ‘Be not high-minded, but fear!’ If the ‘Lord spared not’ thy elder brethren, ‘take heed lest he spare not thee!’
Cf. Rom. 11:20-21.
See Mark 4:19.
Cf. Mark 14:38.
See 2 Cor. 12:9.
2525. You see here, brethren, a short and general sketch of the manner wherein God works upon earth in repairing his work
Orig., AM and SOSO, ‘this work’, corrected by Wesley in his errata and MS annotations in AM.
Cf. Rom. 11:33.
Glasgow, April 28, 1784
Place and date of writing are omitted from the collected Sermons.
How to Cite This Entry
Bibliography:
, “.” In , edited by . , 2024. Entry published February 29, 2024. https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon068.About this Entry
Entry Title: Sermon 68: The Wisdom of God’s Counsels