Notes:
Sermon 119: Walking by Sight and Walking by Faith
1This sermon may be seen as a conscious blending of the basic themes of ‘The Discoveries of Faith’ (viz., faith as the characteristic of spiritual knowledge) and ‘The Omnipresence of God’ (viz., the constant sense of life in God’s personal presence), together with a connecting comment about the newly fashionable cant-word, ‘dissipation’, which Wesley had chosen to define as a ‘studied inattention to the invisible and eternal world’. By contrast with its predecessors, this essay was written in a time of comparative leisure after the Christmas of 1788; it was finished on the day before the annual London Watch-night service, held regularly on New Year’s Eve. A note in the Journal reports Wesley’s preaching on 2 Cor. 5:7 earlier that month at nearby Chatham; this may have been the occasion that prompted this written version.
2In the Journal for December 15 there is a touch of pathos in Wesley’s ‘reflecting on the gentle steps whereby age steals upon us’. Characteristically, however, he counts his blessings: ‘I am still capable of travelling, and my memory is much the same as ever it was; and so, I think, is my understanding.’ The reader must judge as to what signs of old age, if any, the sermon may reflect. Obviously; however, there is no mistaking the continuity of Wesley’s understanding of the meaning of ‘true religion’, defined here once again as ‘no less than living in eternity, …and hereby walking in the love of God and man—in lowliness, meekness, and resignation’; this is a repetition of one of his earliest ideas. There is even a sparkle of irony in his redefinition of ‘dissipation ’, chiefly in terms of religious insensitivity.
3The essay did not appear in the Arminian Magazine until the January and February issues of 1790, without title but numbered ‘Sermon LV’.
XII.5-9. 63-68.
2 Corinthians 5:7
We walk by faith, not by sight.11. How short is this description of real Christians! And yet how exceeding full! It comprehends, it sums up, the whole experience of those that are truly such, from the time they are born of God till they remove into Abraham’s bosom. For who are the ‘we’ that are here spoken of? All that are true Christian believers. I say ‘Christian’, not ‘Jewish’ believers. All that are not only servants but children of God.
For this now familiar distinction, cf. Nos. 10, ‘The Witness of the Spirit, I’, I.12 and n.; and 106, ‘On Faith, Heb. 11:6’, I.10 and n.
Cf. Rom. 8:15-16.
22. All these, and these alone, can say, ‘We walk by faith, and not by sight.’
Cf. 2 Cor. 5:7.
John 14:19.
Cf. Ps. 84:12 (BCP).
John 4:32.
Cf. Eph. 2:1.
1 Cor. 15:22.
Heb. 5:14.
33. In order throughly to understand this important truth it may be proper to consider the whole matter. All the children of men that are not born of God ‘walk by sight’, having no higher principle. By sight, that is, by sense; a part being put for the whole, the sight for all the senses; the rather because it is more noble and more extensive than any or all the rest. There are but few objects which we can discern by the three inferior senses of taste, smell, and feeling: and none of these can take any cognizance of its object unless it be brought into a direct contact with it. Hearing, it 04:050is true, has a larger sphere of action, and gives us some knowledge of things that are distant. But how small is that distance, suppose it were fifty or a hundred miles, compared to that between the earth and the sun? And what is even this in comparison of the distance of the sun and moon and the fixed stars? Yet the sight continually takes knowledge of objects even at this amazing distance!
44. By sight we take knowledge of the visible world, from the surface of the earth to the region of the fixed stars. But what is the world visible to us but ‘a speck of creation’,
Young, The Last Day, II.221 (cf. Wesley, A Collection of Moral and Sacred Poems [1744], II.80); see also No. 54, ‘On Eternity’, §18, where Wesley uses this phrase without quotation marks.
55. But beside these innumerable objects which we cannot see by reason of their distance, have we not sufficient ground to believe that there are innumerable others of too delicate a nature to be discerned by any of our senses? Do not all men of unprejudiced reason allow (the small number of materialists, or atheists—the same thing—I cannot term ‘men of reason’) that there is an invisible world, naturally such, as well as a visible one? But which of our senses is fine enough to take the least knowledge of this? We can no more perceive any part of this by our sight than by our feeling. Should we allow with the ancient poet that,
Cf. Milton, Paradise Lost, iv.677-78; ‘the ancient poet’ here is Hesiod. See No. 70, ‘The Case of Reason Impartially Considered’, II.1 and n.
should we allow that the great Spirit, the Father of all, filleth both heaven and earth; yet is the finest of our senses utterly incapable of perceiving either him or them.
Cf. John Norris’s reference in his Theory and Regulation of Love (1688), p. 29, to ‘that celebrated notion of the Platonists, that as the soul is the image of God, so the body is the image of the soul, and that this visible and material world is but the shadow, or (as Plotinus will have it), the echo of the invisible and immaterial world.’
66. All our external senses are evidently adapted to this external, visible world. They are designed to serve us only while we sojourn here, while we dwell in these houses of clay.
Job 4:19; cf. No. 28, ‘Sermon on the Mount, VIII’, §21 and n.
The basis for Wesley’s radical distinction between empirical and intuitive knowledge; see No. 10, ‘The Witness of the Spirit, I’, I.12 and n.
John Hughes, The Siege of Damascus, III.i.211; see No. 54, ‘On Eternity’, §17 and n.
Joseph Addison; see No. 117, ‘On the Discoveries of Faith’, §8 and n.
77. The most excellent of our senses, it is undeniably plain, can give us no assistance herein. And what can our boasted reason do? It is now universally allowed, Nihil est in intellectu quod non fuit prius in sensu—nothing is in the understanding which was not first perceived by some of the senses.
A scholastic motto; see No. 117, ‘On the Discoveries of Faith’, §1 and n.
88. But is there no help? Must they remain in total darkness concerning the invisible and the eternal world? We cannot affirm this: even the heathens did not all remain in total darkness concerning them. Some few rays of light have in all ages and nations gleamed through the shade. Some light they derived from various fountains, touching the invisible world. ‘The heavens declared the glory of God,’ though not to their outward sight; ‘the firmament showed’
Cf. Ps. 19:1.
For more on Wesley’s doctrine of universal prevenience based on the principles of universal revelation, cf. No. 10, ‘The Witness of the Spirit, I’, I.12 and n.
99. We may likewise reasonably suppose that some traces of knowledge, both with regard to the invisible and the eternal world, were delivered down from Noah and his children both to their immediate and remote descendants. And however these were obscured or disguised by the addition of numberless fables, yet something of truth was still mingled with them, and these streaks of light prevented utter darkness. Add to this that God never in any age or nation ‘left himself’ quite ‘without a witness’ in the hearts of men; but while he ‘gave them rain and fruitful seasons’
Cf. Acts 14:17.
Cf. John 1:9.
1010. But all these lights put together availed no farther than to produce a faint twilight. It gave them, even the most enlightened of them, no ἔλεγχος,
See Notes on Heb. 11:1, where Wesley defines ἔλεγχος as ‘the divine, supernatural “evidence” exhibited to, the “conviction” hereby produced in, a believer of “things not seen”—whether past, future, or spiritual; particularly of God and the things of God.’ See No. 3, ‘Awake, Thou That Steepest’, I.11 and n.
The wisest of all mortal men— Cf. Milton, Paradise Regained,
iv.274-76: Of Socrates—see there his tenement— Whom, well inspired, the oracle pronounced Wisest of men.
that is, of all that were not favoured with divine revelation. Yet what evidence had he of another world, when he addressed those that had condemned him to death: ‘And now, O ye judges, ye are going to live, and I am going to die. Which of these is best, God 04:053knows; but, I suppose, no man does.’
Cf. Plato, Apology, 42. For other references to Socrates, see No. 70, ‘The Case of Reason Impartially Considered’, II.6 and n.
In No. 70, ‘The Case of Reason Impartially Considered’, II.7, Wesley had ‘given them’ this passage (from Aelius Spartianus, De Vita Hadriani, §xxv) in its original Latin. Here he resorts to Prior’s quite loose translation in ‘The Dying Adrian’s Lament’; see also A Farther Appeal, Pt. II, III.19 (11:267 in this edn.).
1111. ‘Thou know’st not what!’ True, there was no knowledge of what was to be hoped or feared after death till ‘the Sun of righteousness’
Mal. 4:2.
2 Tim. 1:10.
Cf. Gal. 1:16.
Cf. Matt. 11:27.
Cf. 2 Cor. 4:6 (Notes); see also No. 10, ‘The Witness of the Spirit, I’, I.12 and n.
1212. It is where sense can be of no farther use that faith comes into our help. It is the grand desideratum:
I.e., the prime requisite; cf. OED for evidence that this Latinism had long since been anglicized, as also in Wesley’s comments on electricity entitled, The Desideratum; Or, Electricity Made Plain and Useful (1760; Bibliog, No. 239).
1313. How different is the case, how vast the pre-eminence of them that ‘walk by faith’! God, having ‘opened the eyes of their understanding’,
Cf. Eph. 1:18.
Cf. Heb. 11:27.
Cf. 1 Cor. 2:9 (Isa. 64:4).
Cf. 1 John 2:20, 27.
Heb. 10:19-20.
Heb. 12:23-24.
Cf. Gal. 2:20.
Cf. Col. 3:3-4.
1414. They that live by faith, ‘walk by faith’. But what is implied in this? They regulate all their judgments concerning good and evil, not with reference to visible and temporal things, but to things invisible and eternal. They think visible things to be of small value, because they pass away like a dream; but on the contrary they account invisible things to be of high value, because they will never pass away. Whatever is invisible is eternal: the things that are not seen do not perish. So the Apostle, ‘The things that are seen are temporal; but the things that are not seen are eternal.’
2 Cor. 4:18 (Notes).
Cf. Col. 3:2.
Cf. Col. 3:1.
Cf. 2 Cor. 4:18.
This metaphor of human life as a pilgrimage, a favourite with the English nominalists and Puritans (epitomized in Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress), appears repeatedly in the Old Testament; it occurs only twice in the New Testament (Acts 7:6 and Heb. 11:9). For medieval notions of homo viator, cf. Oberman, The Harvest of Medieval Theology, pp. 57-67.
Cf. Watts, ‘Come Ye that love the Lord’, Hymn 30, in Hymns and Spiritual Songs, II (Works, IV.209-10); Wesley had adapted it for his Collection of Psalms and Hymns (1737), and again for his 1780 Collection of Hymns for the Use of the People called Methodists, No. 12 (7:94 in this edn.). Both versions read ‘marching through Immanuel’s ground’ instead of ‘travelling’.
1515. Brethren, are you of this number, who are now here before God? Do you see him that is invisible? Have you faith? Living faith? The faith of a child? Can you say, ‘The life that I now live, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me’?
Cf. Gal. 2:20.
Another echo of the General Rules; see No. 22, ‘Sermon on the Mount, II’, II.4 and n.
1616. See then, my dear brethren, that from this time at least ye choose the better part.
Cf. the story of Mary and Martha in Luke 10:38-42; in the Notes Wesley translates τὴν άγαθὴν μερίδα more literally as ‘the good part’.
See 1 Pet. 1:4.
Cf. Nahum 3:17.
Cf. Matt. 6:22.
Heb. 11:27.
Cf. 1 Pet. 5:1.
Cf. Matt. 6:22.
2 Cor. 4:6.
1717. See in particular that all your ‘desire’ be unto him, ‘and unto the remembrance of his name’.
Cf. Isa. 26.8.
1 Tim. 6:9 (Notes).
1 John 2:15.
1 John 2:16; cf. No. 7, ‘The Way to the Kingdom’, II.2 and n.
1 John 2:16.
Cf. 1 Cor. 7:31; cf. 1 John 2:17.
1 John 2:17.
1818. Observe well. This is religion, and this alone; this alone is true Christian religion. Not this or that opinion, or system of opinions, be they ever so true, ever so scriptural. It is true this is commonly called ‘faith’. But those who suppose it to be religion are given up to a strong delusion, to believe a lie;
See 2 Thess. 2:11.
Something like this is in Peter Bulkeley, The Gospel-Covenant (1651), p. 382: ‘Justness in dealing without holiness is but heathenish harmlessness.’ A more direct source for Wesley’s quotation, if exact, is still unlocated. See also No. 32, ‘Sermon on the Mount, XII’, II.2 and n.
Rev. 9:11; 20:1; see No. 32, ‘Sermon on the Mount, XII’, I.7 and n.
Cf. Isa. 66:3.
Col. 3:3.
Cf. 1 John 4:16.
Cf. Matt. 6:10.
1919. It will easily be observed that this is the very thing that men of the world call ‘enthusiasm’
Cf. No. 37, ‘The Nature of Enthusiasm’.
Cf. Acts 26:24, where it is ‘learning’, not ‘religion’, that is blamed for Paul’s ‘raving’.
2020. From all that has been said it may be seen with the utmost clearness what is the nature of that fashionable thing called ‘dissipation’.
Wesley is here giving a current cliche a special meaning; cf. OED (5). See §21 below; see also Nos. 79, ‘On Dissipation’, §1 and n.; and 23, ‘Sermon on the Mount, III’, I.11 and n.
Matt. 11:15, etc.
Eph. 2:12.
2121. This is the real nature of ‘dissipation’. And is it so harmless a thing as it is usually thought? It is one of the choicest instruments of destroying immortal spirits that was ever forged in the magazines of hell. It has been the means of plunging myriads of souls, that might have enjoyed the glory of God, into the 04:059everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels.
Matt. 25:41.
Ps. 49:12, 20.
Col. 3:1.
Cf. 2 Pet. 1:11.
London, Dec. 30, 1788
How to Cite This Entry
Bibliography:
, “.” In , edited by . , 2024. Entry published February 25, 2024. https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon119.About this Entry
Entry Title: Sermon 119: Walking by Sight and Walking by Faith