Sermon
# found: 0
Toggle:
Show Page #s Notes (4)

Notes:

Sermon 132: On Faith

   https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon132

04:187 An Introductory Comment

1At the time of Wesley’s death, his sermon, ‘On the Wedding Garment’ was already being printed for inclusion in the March and April issues of the Arminian Magazine, 1791. Moreover, as we have already seen, James Creighton had decided that for the May and June issues he would publish ‘Human Life a Dream’, on the supposition that it would be Wesley’s last published writing. Presently, however, yet another sermon manuscript turned up, and was promptly printed in the July and August issues of 1791, with the following postscript:

“N.B. This is the last sermon which Mr. Wesley wrote. It is very remarkable that the preceding sermon inserted in our Magazine for May and June had been about fifteen months [cf. Creighton’s ‘eighteen’, above] in the hand of the Corrector of the Press, who had laid it by without any design, except that it was not dated, as all the rest were, and inserted several others, though later written. Then he inserted it, the first part of which was printed before Mr. Wesley’s last illness, and the latter part was printing on the very day when his remains lay in the Chapel, previous to its interment. Whoever looks back to that part of it inserted in the Magazine for June, will be struck when he considers the above circumstances, and sees how it is connected with the sermon now inserted; and all this without any design, either of the writer or any other person.
1

AM, XIV.406.

After this, as noted above, four more sermons were discovered in Bristol, written during the previous spring, summer, and early fall, and these were then published, belatedly, in the Magazine in 1792.

2This last-written sermon is dated, ‘London, January 17, 1791’. There is no Journal entry for its day (or period); Wesley’s diary records his reading of a sermon during these days but not his writing of one. The probability is that on the 17th he had closed out yet another written meditation ‘on faith’. He had, of course, already published one sermon on Heb. 11:1 (see No. 117, ‘On the Discoveries of Faith’). Here, however, his focus is more restricted and specific. At the outset, he defines ‘faith’ in an explicitly mystical sense. Whereas Matthew Henry had taken πίστις in this context to mean ‘the firm assent of the soul to the divine revelation and every part of it’, Wesley understands it as ‘a divine conviction of the invisible and eternal world’(§I). This allows him then 04:188to speak of that world in both eschatological and ethical terms. He pays his critical respects to Archibald Campbell and to others who seem to him to presume beyond the truth vouchsafed to us in Scripture; he dwells on some interesting speculative notions of his own. His conclusion is fittingly serene.

3As usual, the sermon had no title when it appeared in the Arminian Magazine;

2

XIV.344-49, 400-406.

its heading there reads ‘Sermon LXIV. On Hebrews xi.1’. George Story, realizing that he had two sermons on the same biblical text on his hands, included this one in SOSO, IX, as: ‘No. 13. Second Sermon on Hebrews xi.1’. Joseph Benson gave it the title, ‘On Faith’ for his edition (1812) and was dutifully followed by Thomas Jackson.

On Faith

Hebrews 11:1

Now faith is the evidence of things not seen.

11. Many times have I thought, many times have I spoke, many times have I wrote upon these words;

3

E.g., see Nos. 117, ‘On the Discoveries of Faith’ on Heb. 11:1; 43, The Scripture Way of Salvation, II.1; and the ‘Extract from a Letter to Mr. Law’, Jan. 6, 1756 (Telford, III.359); see also No. 3, ‘Awake, Thou That Steepest’, I.11 and n.

and yet there appears to be a depth in them which I am in no wise able to fathom. Faith is, in one sense of the word, a divine conviction of God and of the things of God; in another (nearly related to, yet not altogether the same) it is a divine conviction of the invisible and eternal world. In this sense I would now consider—

22. I am now an immortal spirit, strangely connected with a little portion of earth; but this is only for a while. In a short time I am to quit this tenement of clay, and to remove into another state,

which the living know not,
And the dead cannot, or they may not tell!
4

Cf. John Hughes, The Siege of Damascus, III.i.203-4; see also No. 54, ‘On Eternity’, §17, and n. 55.

04:189What kind of existence shall I then enter upon? When my spirit has launched out of the body, how shall I feel myself? Perceive my own being? How shall I discern the things that are round about me, either material or spiritual objects? When my eyes no longer transmit the rays of light, how will the naked spirit

5

See No. 124, ‘Human Life a Dream’, §9 and n.

see? When the organs of hearing are mouldered into dust, in what manner shall I hear? When the brain is of no farther use, what means of thinking shall I have? When my whole body is resolved into senseless earth, what means shall I have of gaining knowledge?

33. How strange, how incomprehensible, are the means whereby I shall then take knowledge even of the material world! Will things appear then as they do now? Of the same size, shape, and colour? Or will they be altered in any or all these respects? How will the sun, moon, and stars appear? The sublunary heavens? The planetary heavens? The region of the fixed stars? How the fields of ether,

6

Cf. Sir Richard Blackmore, ‘Creation; A Philosophical Poem’, in Chalmers, British Poets, X.380; the phrase occurs also in Dryden, Somerville, and James Thomson. Such terms as ‘sublunary’, ‘planetary’, ‘fixed stars’, ‘fields of ether’ were part and parcel of eighteenth-century popular science. See Nos. 55, On the Trinity, §7 and n.; and 56, ‘God’s Approbation of His Works’, I.5 and n.

which we may conceive to be millions of miles beyond them? Of all this we know nothing yet—and indeed we need to know nothing.

44. What then can we know of those innumerable objects which properly belong to the invisible world? Which mortal eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither hath it entered into our heart to conceive?

7

See 1 Cor. 2:9.

What a scene will then be opened, when the regions of Hades are displayed without a covering! Our English translators seem to have been much at a loss for a word to render this. Indeed two hundred years ago
8

All the English versions in Wesley’s time had rendered ᾅδης as ‘hell’, with the exception of Wycliffe and Douai which have ‘torments’ for Luke 16:23, and Geneva which has ‘grave’ for Acts 2:27, 31. Wesley, however, translates it as ‘hell’ in Matt. 11:23 and Luke 16:23; whereas in Acts 1:18 and Rev. 1:18; 6:8; 20:13, he resorts to a transliteration, ‘Hades’.

it was tolerably expressed by the word ‘hell’, which then signified much the same with the word ‘Hades’, namely, the invisible world. Accordingly by Christ descending into hell they meant his body remained in the grave, his soul remained in Hades, which is the receptacle of separate spirits, from death to the resurrection. Here we cannot doubt but the spirits of the righteous are inexpressibly happy. They are, as St. 04:190Paul expresses it, ‘with the Lord’, favoured with so intimate a communion with him as ‘is far better’
9

Cf. Phil. 1:23.

than whatever the chief of the apostles experienced while in this world. On the other hand, we learn from our Lord’s own account of Dives and Lazarus that the rich man, from the moment he left the world, entered into a state of torment.
10

Cf. No. 115, ‘Dives and Lazarus’.

And ‘there is a great gulf fixed’
11

Luke 16:26.

in Hades between the place of the holy and that of unholy spirits, which it is impossible for either the one or the other to pass over. Indeed a gentleman of great learning, the honourable Mr. Campbell,
12

Archibald Campbell, a Scottish Nonjuror, briefly Bishop of Aberdeen (1721-24) and active in the unsuccessful negotiations between the Nonjurors and the Eastern Orthodox. He is best known for The Doctrines of a Middle State Between Death and the Resurrection (1721). This reflects the eschatological views of Eastern Orthodoxy and differs explicitly from Roman Catholic teachings on purgatory.

in his account of the middle state published not many years ago, seems to suppose that wicked souls may amend in Hades, and then remove to a happier mansion. He has great hopes that ‘the rich man’ mentioned by our Lord, in particular, might be purified by that penal fire, till, in process of time, he might be qualified for a better abode. But who can reconcile this with Abraham’s assertion that none can pass over the ‘great gulf?
13

The issue here was whether Dives had died totally unrepentant and therefore in mortal sin (Wesley’s view) or with some glimmer of presumptive repentance and faith. Cf. Campbell’s argument (pp. 12-14) that ‘the great gulf fixed’ is between those who go into Hades without repentance and amendment of life at all and those who, though ‘wicked’ (like Dives), have nonetheless a modicum of distinterested love for others which Campbell claims is a form of true repentance. He is as clear as Wesley that purgatory has no escape hatches for the finally unrepentant. There is a gulf which separates between the ‘Right-’ and the ‘Left-hand sides of Hades, which makes it impracticable for any soul that is on the one side to go into the other. This secures the righteous, who are on the right, from falling…and effectually hinders the wicked, who are on the left, from entering into the lot of the righteous’ (p. 57). This is re-emphasized on pp. 135, 137-78, a catena of twenty-nine advocates of what Campbell claims are similar doctrines of ‘a Middle State’, from Calvin to someone cited as ‘Dr. J. E. Grate’ (i.e., his own contemporary, Dr. John Ernest Grave, a learned patrologist).

55. I cannot therefore but think that all those who are with the rich man in the unhappy division of Hades will remain there, howling and blaspheming, cursing God and looking upwards, till they are cast into ‘the everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels’.

14

Matt. 25:41.

And on the other hand, can we reasonably doubt but that those who are now in paradise, in Abraham’s bosom,
15

Luke 16:22.

all 04:191those holy souls who have been discharged from the body from the beginning of the world unto this day, will be continually ripening for heaven,
16

John Flavell, Husbandry Spiritualized, in Works (1740), II.272 (‘ripening apace for heaven’). See also Wesley’s extract in the Christian Lib., XXVII.229; and No. 114, On the Death of John Fletcher, III.12 (‘ripening for glory’).

will be perpetually holier and happier, till they are received into ‘the kingdom prepared for them from the foundation of the world’?
17

Matt. 25:34.

66. But who can inform us in what part of the universe Hades is situated? This abode of both happy and unhappy spirits till they are reunited to their bodies? It has not pleased God to reveal anything concerning it in the Holy Scripture; and consequently it is not possible for us to form any judgment or even conjecture about it. Neither are we informed how either one or the other are employed during the time of their abode there. Yet may we not improbably suppose that the Governor of the world may sometimes permit wicked souls

To do his gloomy errands in the deep?
18

Cf. Milton, Paradise Lost, i.152.

Or perhaps, in conjunction with evil angels, to inflict vengeance on wicked men. Or will many of them be shut up in the chains of darkness unto the great judgment of the great day? In the meantime, may we not probably suppose that the spirits of the just, though generally lodged in paradise, yet may sometimes, in conjunction with the holy angels, minister to the heirs of salvation?

19

See Heb. 1:14.

May they not

Sometimes on errands of love,
Revisit their brethren below?
20

Almost certainly an attempted recollection of a stanza from his brother’s Hymns for…Redemption (1747), Hymn XXII, st. 2 (Poet. Wks., IV.240). But cf. No. 115, ‘Dives and Lazarus’, I.3 and n., where John’s views of ‘the peaceable dead’ in Paradise differ sharply from Charles’s other lines in this stanza: ‘Their souls are impassive above, / And nothing of mortals they know.’

It is a pleasing thought that some of these human spirits attending us with, or in the room of, angels, are of the number of those that were dear to us while they were in the body. So that there is no absurdity in the question:

04:192Have ye your own flesh forgot,
By a common ransom bought?
Can death’s interposing tide,
Spirits one in Christ divide?
21

John and Charles Wesley, Hymns and Sacred Poems (1740), p. 199 (Poet. Wks., I.365).

But be this as it may, it is certain human spirits swiftly increase in knowledge, in holiness, and in happiness, conversing with all the wise and holy souls that lived in all ages and nations from the beginning of the world; with angels and archangels, to whom the children of men are no more than infants; and above all with the eternal Son of God, in whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.

22

Col. 2:3.

And let it be especially considered, whatever they learn they will retain for ever. For they forget nothing. To forget is only incident to spirits that are clothed with flesh and blood.

77. But how will this material universe appear to a disembodied spirit? Who can tell whether any of these objects that surround us will appear the same as they do now? And if we know so little of these, what can we now know concerning objects of a quite different nature? Concerning the spiritual world? It seems it will not be possible for us to discern them at all till we are furnished with senses of a different nature, which are not yet opened in our souls. These may enable us both to penetrate the inmost substance of things, whereof we now discern only the surface, and to discern innumerable things of the very existence whereof we have not now the least perception. What astonishing scenes will then discover themselves to our newly opening senses! Probably fields of ether, not only tenfold, but ten thousandfold ‘the length of this terrene’.

23

Milton, Paradise Lost, vi.78; see also No. 54, ‘On Eternity’, §17 and n.

And with what variety of furniture, animate and inanimate! How many orders of beings, not discovered by organs of flesh and blood. Perhaps

Thrones, dominions, princedoms, virtues, powers?
24

Cf. Milton, Paradise Lost, v. 772, 840; x.460.

whether of those that retain their first habitations and primeval strength, or of those that, rebelling against their Creator, have been cast out of heaven? And shall we not then, as far as angel’s 04:193ken,

25

Ibid., i.59.

survey the bounds of creation, and see every place where the Almighty

Stopped his rapid wheels, and said,
This be thy just circumference, O world.
26

Cf. ibid., vii.224, 230-31:

Then stayed the fervid wheels, …
And said, ‘Thus far extend, thus far thy bounds;
This be thy just circumference, O world!

See also No. 69, ‘The Imperfection of Human Knowledge’, I.5 and n.

Yea, shall we not be able to move, quick as thought, through the wide realms of uncreated night?

27

See Milton, Paradise Lost, ii. 150; and No. 26, ‘Sermon on the Mount, VI’, III.6 and n.

Above all, the moment we step into eternity, shall we not feel ourselves swallowed up of him who is in this and every place, who filleth heaven and earth?
28

See Jer. 23:24.

It is only the veil of flesh and blood which now hinders us from perceiving that the great Creator cannot but fill the whole immensity of space. He is every moment above us, beneath us, and on every side. Indeed in this dark abode, this land of shadows, this region of sin and death, the thick cloud which is interposed between conceals him from our sight. But the veil will disappear, and he will appear in unclouded majesty, God over all, blessed for ever!
29

See Rom. 9:5.

88. How variously are the children of men employed in this world! In treading o’er

The paths they trod six thousand years before?
30

Cf. Young, The Last Day, I.78 (‘The paths they trod five thousand years before’); included in Wesley’s Collection of Moral and Sacred Poems (1744), II.73.

But who knows how we shall be employed after we enter that invisible world? A little of it we may conceive, and that without any doubt, provided we keep to what God himself has revealed in his Word, and what he works in the hearts of his children. Let us consider, first, what may be the employment of unholy spirits from death to the resurrection. We cannot doubt but the moment they leave the body they find themselves surrounded by spirits of their own kind, probably human as well as diabolical. What power God may permit these to exercise over them we do not distinctly know. But it is not improbable he may suffer Satan to employ 04:194them, as he does his own angels, in inflicting death or evils of various kinds on the men that know not God. For this end they may raise storms by sea or by land, they may shoot meteors through the air. They may occasion earthquakes, and in numberless ways afflict those whom they are not suffered to destroy. Where they are not permitted to take away life, they may inflict various diseases—and many of these which we judge to be natural are undoubtedly diabolical. I believe this is frequently the case with lunatics. It is observable that many of those mentioned in Scripture who are called lunatics by one of the evangelists are termed demoniacs by another. One of the most eminent physicians I ever knew, particularly in cases of insanity, the late Dr. Deacon,

31

Thomas Deacon (1697-1753), physician and nonjuring bishop, whose Compleat Collection of Devotions (1734) Wesley had carried with him to Georgia. Deacon was a pupil and friend of the celebrated Dr. Richard Mead (1673-1754) and shared his views concerning demoniacal possession; cf. Mead’s Medica Sacra; a Commentary on the Diseases Mentioned in Scripture (1755). None of Deacon’s published writings deal with medical questions. See No. 72, ‘Of Evil Angels’, II.13.

was clearly of opinion that this was the case with many, if not most lunatics. And it is no valid objection to this that these diseases are so often cured by natural means. For a wound inflicted by an evil spirit might be cured as any other; unless that spirit was permitted to repeat the blow.

99. May not some of these evil spirits be likewise employed in conjunction with evil angels in tempting wicked men to sin, and in procuring occasion for them? Yea, and in tempting good men to sin, even after they had escaped the corruption that is in the world? Herein doubtless they put forth all their strength, and greatly glory if they conquer. A passage in an ancient author

32

Orig., ‘anthem’; corrected to ‘author’ in the 1800 edn.

may greatly illustrate this (although I apprehend he did not intend, though, we should take it literally): ‘Satan summoned his powers, and examined what mischief each of them had done. One said, “I have set a house on fire, and destroyed all its inhabitants.” Another said, “I have raised a storm at sea, and sunk a ship, and all on board perished in the waters.” Satan answered, “Perhaps those that were burnt or drowned were saved.” A third said, “I have been forty years tempting a holy man to commit adultery. And I have left him asleep in his sin.” Hearing this, Satan rose to do him honour, and all hell resounded with his praise.’
33

Professor Patrick Henry, III, has located the locus classicus of this story in the Apophthegmata Patrum in Heribert Rosweyd’s 1615 edn., De Vita et Verbis Seniorum, V.v.39 (580); it was reprinted in Migne, PL, LXXIII.855-56, and appears in an English translation by Owen Chadwick in Western Asceticism, LCC, 12:73-74 (Philadelphia, The Westminster Press, 1958). But notice that Chadwick translates et vix nocte iste prevalui ut facerem eum fornicari as ‘at last in the night I prevailed to make him lust’ instead of the literal meaning, ‘to make him fornicate’. It seems unlikely that Wesley would have known Rosweyd’s text, or even that in J. B. Cotelerius, Apophthegmata Patrum (1677). Wesley’s story is clearly the same in its main point but, as one can see in Chadwick, it has been abridged here in transmission.

Hear this, all ye that imagine you cannot fall from grace!

1004:19510. Ought not we then to be perpetually on our guard against those subtle enemies? Though we see them not,

A constant watch they keep:
They eye us night and day;
And never slumber, never sleep,
Lest they should lose their prey.
34

Cf. Charles Wesley, Hymns and Sacred Poems (1749), II.119 (Poet. Wks., V.261); see No. 72, ‘Of Evil Angels’, II.10 and n.

Herein they join with ‘the rulers of the darkness’ (the intellectual darkness) ‘of this world’;

35

Eph. 6:12.

the ignorance, wickedness, and misery diffused through it to hinder all good, and promote all evil! To this end they are continually ‘working’, with energy, ‘in the children of disobedience’.
36

Cf. Eph. 2:2.

Yea, sometimes they work by them those ‘lying wonders’
37

2 Thess. 2:9.

that might almost deceive even the children of God.

1111. But meantime, how may we conceive the inhabitants of the other part of Hades, the souls of the righteous, to be employed? It has been positively affirmed by some philosophical men that spirits have no place! But they do not observe that if it were so they must be omnipresent—an attribute which cannot be allowed to any but the Almighty Spirit. The abode of these blessed spirits the ancient Jews were used to term ‘paradise’—the same name which our Lord gave it, telling the penitent thief, ‘This day shalt thou be with me in paradise.’

38

Luke 23:43; for other comments on ‘paradise’, see Nos. 73, ‘Of Hell’, I.4 and n.; and espec. 115, ‘Dives and Lazarus’, I.3 and n.

Yet in what part of the universe this is situated who can tell, or even conjecture, since it has not pleased God to reveal anything concerning it? But we have no reason to think they are confined to this place; or, indeed, to any other. May we not rather say that, ‘servants of his’, as well as the holy angels, they ‘do his pleasure’,
39

Ps. 103:21 (BCP).

whether among the inhabitants of earth or in any other part of his dominions? And as 04:196we easily believe that they are swifter than the light, even as swift as thought, they are well able to traverse the whole universe in the twinkling of an eye,
40

1 Cor. 15:52.

either to execute the divine commands or to contemplate the works of God. What a field is here opened before them! And how immensely may they increase in knowledge, while they survey his works of creation or providence, or his manifold wisdom in the church! What depth of wisdom, of power, and of goodness do they discover in his methods of bringing many sons to glory!
41

Heb. 2:10.

Especially while they conversed on any of these subjects with the illustrious dead of ancient days! With Adam, first of men, with Noah, who saw both the primeval and the ruined world. With Abraham, the friend of God, with Moses, who was favoured to speak with God, as it were, ‘face to face’;
42

Exod. 33:11.

with Job, perfected by sufferings, with Samuel, David, Solomon, Isaiah, Daniel, and all the prophets. With the apostles, the noble army of martyrs,
43

BCP, Morning Prayer, Te Deum.

and all the saints who have lived and died to the present day; with our elder brethren the holy angels, cherubim, seraphim, and all the companies of heaven! Above all [with the Lord of creation himself,] with Jesus, the Mediator of the new covenant.
44

A conjectural reconstruction of what may have been an undecipherable passage. Both the 1791 and 1800 edns. read, ‘Above all the name of creature owns, with Jesus, the Mediator of the New Covenant’, which scarcely makes sense. Wesley clearly intended a climax here; cf. BCP, Morning Prayer, Te Deum; see also No. 117, ‘On the Discoveries of Faith’, §8.

Meantime how will they advance in holiness, in the whole image of God wherein they were created! In the love of God and man, gratitude to their Creator, and benevolence to all their fellow-creatures. Yet it does not follow (what some earnestly maintain) that this general benevolence will at all interfere with that peculiar affection which God himself implants for our relations, friends, and benefactors. O no! Had you stood by his bedside when that dying saint was crying out, ‘I have a father and a mother gone to heaven’ (to paradise, the receptacle of happy spirits); ‘I have ten brothers and sisters gone to heaven; and now I am going to them, that am the eleventh! Blessed be God that I was born!’
45

The deathbed scene of Thomas Halyburton; see No. 120, ‘The Unity of the Divine Being’, §18 and n.; the quotation here is from Wesley, An Extract of the Life and Death of Mr. Thomas Haliburton (1741), pp. 86-87.

would you have replied: ‘What if you are going to them? They will be no more to you than any other persons; for you will not know them.’ Not know them! Nay, does not all that is in you 04:197recoil at that thought? Indeed sceptics may ask, ‘How do disembodied spirits know each other?’ I answer plainly, I cannot tell. But I am certain that they do. This is as plainly proved from one passage of Scripture as it could be from a thousand. Did not Abraham and Lazarus know each other in Hades, even afar off? Even though they were fixed on different sides of the ‘great gulf’?
46

Luke 16:26. Is this a mistake for what should read ‘Abraham and Dives’? Cf. ver. 23, where ‘the rich man’ sees ‘Abraham afar off and Lazarus in his bosom’. This would seem to exclude the notion that Abraham and Lazarus were ‘afar off’ on ‘different sides of “the great gulf”’.

Can we doubt then whether the souls that are together in paradise shall know one another? The Scripture therefore clearly decides this question. And so does the very reason of the thing. For we know every holy temper which we carry with us into paradise will remain in us for ever. But such is gratitude to our benefactors. This therefore will remain for ever. And this implies that the knowledge of our benefactors will remain, without which it cannot exist.

1212. And how much will that add to the happiness of those spirits which are already discharged from the body, that they are permitted to minister to those whom they have left behind! An indisputable proof of this we have in the twenty-second chapter of the Revelation. When the Apostle fell down to worship the glorious spirit which he seems to have mistaken for Christ, he told him plainly, ‘I am of thy fellow-servants, the prophets’;

47

Cf. Rev. 22:9.

not God, not an angel, not a human spirit. And in how many ways may they minister to the heirs of salvation!
48

See Heb. 1:14.

Sometimes by counteracting wicked spirits whom we cannot resist because we cannot see them; sometimes by preventing our being hurt by men, or beasts, or inanimate creatures. How often may it please God to answer the prayer of good Bishop Ken:

O may thine angels while I sleep
Around my bed their vigils keep!
Their love angelical instil,
Stop all the consequence of ill:
May they celestial joys rehearse,
And thought to thought with me converse;
Or in my stead the whole night long
Sing to my God a grateful song.
49

Thomas Ken, ‘An Evening Hymn’, sts. 10-11, adapted; cf. Wesley, A Collection of Psalms and Hymns (1738), pp. 58-59; see also No. 71, ‘Of Good Angels’, II.2 and n.

04:198And may not the Father of spirits allot this office jointly to angels and human spirits waiting to be made perfect?

1313. It may indeed be objected that God has no need of any subordinate agents, of either angelical or human spirits, to guard his children in their waking or sleeping hours; seeing he that keepeth Israel doth neither slumber nor sleep.

50

See Ps. 121:4.

And certainly he is able to preserve them by his own immediate power, yea, and he is able by his own immediate power, without any instruments at all, to supply the wants of all his creatures, both in heaven and earth. But it is and ever was his pleasure not to work by his own immediate power only, but chiefly by subordinate means, from the beginning of the world. And how wonderfully is his wisdom displayed in adjusting all these to each other! So that we may well cry out: ‘O Lord, how manifold are thy works! In wisdom hast thou made them all!’
51

Ps. 104:24.

1414. This we know concerning the whole frame and arrangement of the visible world. But how exceeding little do we now know concerning the invisible? And we should have known still less of it had it not pleased the Author of both worlds to give us more than natural light, to give us ‘his word to be a lantern to our feet, and a light in all our paths’.

52

Cf. Ps. 119:105 (BCP).

And holy men of old, being assisted by his Spirit, have discovered many particulars of which otherwise we should have had no conception.

1515. And without revelation how little certainty of invisible things did the wisest of men obtain! The small glimmerings of light which they had were merely conjectural. At best they were only a faint, dim twilight, delivered from uncertain tradition; and so obscured by heathen fables that it was but one degree better than utter darkness.

1616. How uncertain the best of these conjectures was may easily be gathered from their own accounts. The most finished of all these accounts is that of the great Roman poet. Where observe how warily he begins, with that apologetic preface:

Sit mihi fas audita loqui?
53

Virgil, Aeneid, vi.266; the original is not a question but a plea, ‘Allow me to tell what I have heard’ (Loeb, 63:525).

May I be allowed to tell what I have heard?

04:199And in the conclusion, lest anyone should imagine he believed any of these accounts, he sends the relator of them out of Hades by the ‘ivory gate’, through which he had just informed us that only dreams and shadows pass!

54

Ibid., vi.893-96; see No. 73, ‘Of Hell’, §3 and n.

A very plain intimation that all which has gone before is to be looked upon as a dream!

1717. How little regard they had for all these conjectures with regard to the invisible world clearly appears from the words of his brother poet, who affirms without any scruple:

Esse aliquos manes et subterranea regna
Nec pueri credunt
55

AM and Benson have Nec fieri credunt—which makes no sense. Wesley may have written viri, as one may see from his translation, ‘not even a man of them now believes.’ But his source was Juvenal, Satires, ii.149, 152, which reads, Nec pueri credunt (‘these things not even boys believe’); Jackson may have known this, for his text also reads pueri.

‘That there are ghosts or realms below, not even a man of them now believes.’

So little could even the most improved reason discover concerning the invisible and eternal world. The greater cause have we to praise the Father of lights, who hath opened the eyes of our understanding

56

See Eph. 1:18.

to discern those things which could not be seen by eyes of flesh and blood; that he who of old time shined out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, and enlightened us with the light of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ,
57

See 2 Cor. 4:6.

the author and finisher of our faith,
58

Heb. 12:2.

by whom he made the worlds;
59

Heb. 1:2.

by whom he now sustains whatever he hath made; for

Till nature shall her Judge survey,
The King Messiah reigns.
60

Samuel Wesley, Jun., ‘An Hymn to God the Son’, Poems (1736), p. 4, published by John Wesley in A Collection of Psalms and Hymns (1737), p. 12; and A Collection of Moral and Sacred Poems (1744), III.181.

These things we have believed upon the testimony of God, the Creator of all things visible and invisible.

61

BCP, Communion, Nicene Creed.

By this testimony we already know the things that now exist, though not yet seen, as well as those that will exist in their season, until this visible world will pass away and the Son of man shall come in his glory.

1804:20018. Upon the whole, what thanks ought we to render to God, who has vouchsafed this ‘evidence of things unseen’ to the poor inhabitants of earth, who otherwise must have remained in utter darkness concerning them! How invaluable a gift is even this imperfect light to the benighted sons of men! What a relief is it to the defects of our senses, and consequently of our understanding, which can give us no information of anything but what is first presented by the senses.

62

See No. 117, ‘On the Discoveries of Faith’, §1 and n.

But hereby a new set of senses (so to speak) is opened in our souls, and by this means,

The things unknown to feeble sense,
Unseen by reason’s glimmering ray,
With strong, commanding evidence
Their heav’nly origin display.
Faith lends its realizing light:
The clouds disperse, the shadows fly;
Th’ Invisible appears in sight,
And God is seen by mortal eye!
63

Charles Wesley, ‘The Life of Faith’, sts. 5-6, in Hymns and Sacred Poems (1740), p. 7 (Poet. Wks., I.210). See No. 54, ‘On Eternity’, §17 and n.

London, Jan. 17, 1791


How to Cite This Entry

, “” in , last modified February 25, 2024, https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon132.

Bibliography:

, “.” In , edited by . , 2024. Entry published February 25, 2024. https://wesleyworks.ecdsdev.org/sermons/Sermon132.

About this Entry

Entry Title: Sermon 132: On Faith

Copyright and License for Reuse

Except otherwise noted, this page is © 2024.
Show full citation information...